Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. in June 2020

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. was on the 6,897th place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 112,114th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect." is the 12,958th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
6,897th place
185,846
-28,315
AR-score:
12,958th place
8,946
+47
F-score:
112,114th place
7
0

Italian Wikipedia

PR-score:
106th place
91,325
-10,250
AR-score:
990th place
2,375
0
F-score:
22,759th place
1
0

English Wikipedia

PR-score:
16,640th place
83,089
-14,647
AR-score:
14,290th place
5,991
+17
F-score:
93,032nd place
4
0

Czech Wikipedia

PR-score:
1,206th place
5,940
-3,270
AR-score:
1,404th place
500
+30
F-score:
6,820th place
1
0

Russian Wikipedia

PR-score:
13,170th place
5,492
-148
AR-score:
37,714th place
80
0
F-score:
51,815th place
1
0

Popularity and reliability assessment of sources in references of Wikipedia in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps in July 2020. More details in the research "Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia". Values for PR-score and AR-score were additinaly increased 100 times (to distinguish smaller values in the ranking).

Useful links: