Best sources in Tibetan Wikipedia PR-model

AR-model | F-model | PR-model
#WebsiteScore in June 20201m changes
1kartverket.no11,500+7,000
2ssb.no11,500+7,000
3who.int6,490-11,250
4archive.org4,270-1,650
5architectsjournal.co.uk4,050-7,950
6bbc.com2,440-3,300
7ourworldindata.org2,440-3,300
8sciencemag.org2,400+500
9dawashonu.blogspot.com2,300-2,500
10berzinarchives.com2,200+400
11fifa.com1,950+1,276
12kanzhongguo.com1,800+1,300
13liveside.net1,633+1,433
14wpcentral.com1,633+1,433
15zdnet.com1,633+1,433
16khoryug.org1,600+1,400
17yongzin.com1,500+600
18nobelprize.org1,475-394
19wikipedia.org1,400+1,100
20fonts.com1,300+1,200
21arcgis.com1,220-1,650
22worldometers.info1,220-1,650
23nationalgeographic.com700-700
24journal-laterrasse.fr400+350
25youfr.com400+350
26bloody-disgusting.com350+250
27darkhorizons.com350+250
28newscientist.com350-350
29cnn.com350-350
30insight-egypt.com300+267
31mmedia.me300+267
32knopedia.com300+267
33pitzer.edu233-11
34robertgraham.wordpress.com233-11
35stanford.edu233-11
36theanarchistlibrary.org233-11
37mises.org233-11
38umontreal.ca233-11
39r7.com216+141
40terra.com.br216+141
41apdnews.com216+141
42climate-data.org100-100
43fle.fr100+50
44french-paris.com100+50
45thlib.org100-600
46encyclopedia.com75+50
47bbc.co.uk75+50
48google.co.uk75+50
49vice.com500
50wsj.com500
51nytimes.com24-6

Scientific publications with DOI number

#WebsiteScore in June 20201m changes

Popularity and reliability assessment of sources in references of Wikipedia in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps in July 2020. More details in the research "Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia". Values for PR-score and AR-score were additinaly increased 100 times (to distinguish smaller values in the ranking).

Useful links: