Comparison of headspace solid-phase microextraction with conventional extraction for the analysis of the volatile components in Melia azedarach

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work Comparison of headspace solid-phase microextraction with conventional extraction for the analysis of the volatile components in Melia azedarach was on the 766,083rd place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 617,464th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "Comparison of headspace solid-phase microextraction with conventional extraction for the analysis of the volatile components in Melia azedarach" is the 786,776th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
766,083rd place
1,068
-150
AR-score:
786,776th place
181
+13
F-score:
617,464th place
2
0

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
674,699th place
900
-93
AR-score:
693,744th place
156
+13
F-score:
807,710th place
1
0

Spanish Wikipedia (es)

PR-score:
68,627th place
168
-57
AR-score:
69,583rd place
25
0
F-score:
55,106th place
1
0

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...