Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance was on the 804,226th place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 616,428th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance" is the 1,023,813th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
804,226th place
883
-109
AR-score:
1,023,813th place
71
+1
F-score:
616,428th place
2
0

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
696,169th place
783
-36
AR-score:
863,608th place
65
+1
F-score:
797,718th place
1
0

Spanish Wikipedia (es)

PR-score:
74,198th place
100
-73
AR-score:
83,996th place
5
0
F-score:
80,622nd place
1
0

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...