Lung Structure and Ventilation in Theropod Dinosaurs and Early Birds

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work Lung Structure and Ventilation in Theropod Dinosaurs and Early Birds was on the 39,133rd place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 4,810th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "Lung Structure and Ventilation in Theropod Dinosaurs and Early Birds" is the 38,703rd most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
39,133rd place
63,246
-13,305
AR-score:
38,703rd place
4,675
+36
F-score:
4,810th place
53
0

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
45,612th place
43,057
-10,344
AR-score:
59,337th place
2,611
+7
F-score:
13,497th place
13
0

Spanish Wikipedia (es)

PR-score:
7,842nd place
17,400
-2,162
AR-score:
10,515th place
734
+21
F-score:
6,766th place
3
0

Korean Wikipedia (ko)

PR-score:
10,159th place
737
+369
AR-score:
6,260th place
162
0
F-score:
7,081st place
1
0

Croatian Wikipedia (hr)

PR-score:
682nd place
531
-34
AR-score:
551st place
110
+8
F-score:
114th place
6
0

Chinese Wikipedia (zh)

PR-score:
44,686th place
397
-285
AR-score:
14,563rd place
202
0
F-score:
2,087th place
6
0

French Wikipedia (fr)

PR-score:
52,608th place
323
-238
AR-score:
30,390th place
234
0
F-score:
3,633rd place
6
0

Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia (sh)

PR-score:
2,014th place
217
-408
AR-score:
3,834th place
51
0
F-score:
196th place
6
0

Hungarian Wikipedia (hu)

PR-score:
10,437th place
129
-42
AR-score:
3,685th place
160
0
F-score:
287th place
6
0

Polish Wikipedia (pl)

PR-score:
39,781st place
61
-115
AR-score:
15,258th place
223
0
F-score:
30,622nd place
1
0
Show all Wikipedia languages...

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...