اقتصاد لاسلطوي (Arabic Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "اقتصاد لاسلطوي" in Arabic language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Arabic rank
1st place
1st place
9,546th place
low place
3rd place
8th place
6th place
3rd place
321st place
616th place
5th place
4th place
low place
low place
2nd place
5th place
low place
9,272nd place
low place
low place
259th place
735th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,883rd place
low place
low place
low place
14th place
41st place
70th place
26th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,738th place
low place

000webhost.com

  • "el capitalismo es sólo el efecto del gobierno; desaparecido el gobierno, el capitalismo cae de su pedestal vertiginosamente...Lo que llamamos capitalismo no es otra cosa que el producto del Estado, dentro del cual lo único que se cultiva es la ganancia, bien o mal habida. Luchar, pues, contra el capitalismo es tarea inútil, porque sea Capitalismo de Estado o Capitalismo de Empresa, mientras el Gobierno exista, existirá el capital que explota. La lucha, pero de conciencias, es contra el Estado." Anarquismo by Miguel Gimenez Igualada نسخة محفوظة 31 يناير 2017 على موقع واي باك مشين.

archive.org

archive.today

books.google.com

bradspangler.com

c4ss.org

  • Carson, Kevin (19 June 2009). "Socialism: A Perfectly Good Word Rehabilitated". Center for a Stateless Society. "But there has always been a market-oriented strand of libertarian socialism that emphasizes voluntary cooperation between producers. And markets, properly understood, have always been about cooperation. As a commenter at Reason magazine's Hit&Run blog, remarking on Jesse Walker's link to the Kelly article, put it: "every trade is a cooperative act." In fact, it's a fairly common observation among market anarchists that genuinely free markets have the most legitimate claim to the label "socialism." "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-27. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-04-16.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
  • Broze, Derrick (13 September 2016). "Agorism is Not Anarcho-Capitalism". Center for a Stateless Society. Retrieved 15 July 2019. نسخة محفوظة 15 يوليو 2019 على موقع واي باك مشين.

doi.org

fee.org

free.fr

joseph.dejacque.free.fr

independent.org

infoshop.org

lewrockwell.com

liberalis.pl

en.liberalis.pl

libertarian-labyrinth.org

libertarianism.org

libertariannation.org

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

pageabode.com

anarchism.pageabode.com

radgeek.com

sheldonfreeassociation.blogspot.com

slate.com

theamericanconservative.com

theanarchistlibrary.org

  • "The anarchists were unanimous in subjecting authoritarian socialism to a barrage of severe criticism. At the time when they made violent and satirical attacks these were not entirely well founded, for those to whom they were addressed were either primitive or "vulgar" communists, whose thought had not yet been fertilized by Marxist humanism, or else, in the case of Marx and Engels themselves, were not as set on authority and state control as the anarchists made out". Daniel Guerin, Anarchism: From Theory to Practice (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1970). نسخة محفوظة 6 أبريل 2020 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • Déjacque criticized French mutualist anarchist Pierre Joseph Proudhon as far as "the Proudhonist version of Ricardian socialism, centred on the reward of labour power and the problem of exchange value. In his polemic with Proudhon on women's emancipation, Déjacque urged Proudhon to push on 'as far as the abolition of the contract, the abolition not only of the sword and of capital, but of property and authority in all their forms,' and refuted the commercial and wages logic of the demand for a 'fair reward' for 'labour' (labour power). Déjacque asked: 'Am I thus... right to want, as with the system of contracts, to measure out to each – according to their accidental capacity to produce – what they are entitled to?' The answer given by Déjacque to this question is unambiguous: 'it is not the product of his or her labour that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature.' [...] For Déjacque, on the other hand, the communal state of affairs – the phalanstery 'without any hierarchy, without any authority' except that of the 'statistics book' – corresponded to 'natural exchange,' i.e. to the 'unlimited freedom of all production and consumption; the abolition of any sign of agricultural, individual, artistic or scientific property; the destruction of any individual holding of the products of work; the demonarchisation and the demonetarisation of manual and intellectual capital as well as capital in instruments, commerce and buildings."Alain Pengam. "Anarchist-Communism" نسخة محفوظة 1 أبريل 2012 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • "Anarcho-Hucksters: There is Nothing Anarchistic about Capitalism". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-09-15.
  • "Ecology or "Anarcho"-capitalism?". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-08-08.
  • "Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-01-07.
  • Boraas, Ed; Elkin, Gary; McKay, Iain; Neal, Dave (18 June 2009). "Benjamin Tucker: Capitalist or Anarchist?" نسخة محفوظة 13 فبراير 2020 على موقع واي باك مشين"Lysander Spooner: right-"libertarian" or libertarian socialist?"An Anarchist FAQ. Retrieved 2 April 2020. نسخة محفوظة 13 فبراير 2020 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • MacSaorsa, Iain (3 December 2009). "The Ideas of Lysander Spooner — Libertarian or libertarian socialist?" Spunk. Retrieved 2 April 2020. نسخة محفوظة 21 مارس 2019 على موقع واي باك مشين.

thefreemanonline.org

web.archive.org

worldcat.org