الشيطان الأكبر (Arabic Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "الشيطان الأكبر" in Arabic language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Arabic rank
1st place
1st place
264th place
153rd place
3rd place
8th place
1,353rd place
2,075th place
7th place
23rd place
2,980th place
2,404th place
1,116th place
771st place
198th place
308th place
8th place
10th place
833rd place
1,051st place
544th place
397th place

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

  • Staff writer(s) (7 ديسمبر 2009). "How Iran's opposition inverts old slogans". BBC. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2010-01-02. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. One of the big anti-Shah chants ended with the slogan "Death to Shah!"...A main revolutionary cry was: "Estaghlal, Azadi, Jomhuriye Eslami" (Eng: Independence, Freedom, Islamic Republic).

books.google.com

dtic.mil

farsnews.com

foreignpolicy.com

  • Staff writer(s) (c. 1975). "The Battle for Iran (excerpt)". Central Intelligence Agency. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-12-17. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. Complete secrecy about the operation that was known under the cryptonym of TPAJAX has been impossible to enforce...[T]he military coup that overthrew Mosadeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.

gwu.edu

nsarchive.gwu.edu

jpost.com

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

  • Risen، James (16 أبريل 2000). "SECRETS OF HISTORY: The C.I.A. in Iran -- A special report.; How a Plot Convulsed Iran in '53 (and in '79)". The New York Times. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-09-02. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21.

partners.nytimes.com

  • Risen، James (16 أبريل 2000). "Key Events in the 1953 Coup". The New York Times. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-09-06. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. Aug. 16, 1953…The shah flees to Baghdad.

pbs.org

  • Staff writer(s) (2014). "Chronology: U.S.–Iran relations 1906-2002". PBS News\Frontline. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-04-19. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. 1964... Khomeini is exiled to Turkey for his outspoken denunciation of the shah's Status of Forces bill, which grants U.S. military personnel diplomatic immunity for crimes committed on Iranian soil.

state.gov

history.state.gov

  • Acheson، Dean (7 فبراير 1952). "Telegram from The Secretary of State to the Embassy in Iran. (Memo of conversation 1 February 1952 between U.S. Department of State and British representatives regarding the Iranian political situation)". Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-04-12. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. Although Mosadeq [will] not likely turn toward Russia it is highly improbable that he will do anything [to] check communism in Iran since his ideas of polit[ical] tolerance, neutrality, and fear of offending [the] USSR w[ou]ld prevent his taking action vs Tudeh regardless [of the] outcome [of] the oil question and request[s for] US financial assistance.
  • Henderson، Loy (28 يوليو 1952). "The Ambassador in Iran (Henderson) to the Department of State, repeated to London". Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-04-13. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. ...I could not but be discouraged at [the] thought that [a] person [Mosadeq] so lacking in stability and clearly dominated by emotions and prejudices sh[ou]ld represent [the] only bulwark left between Iran and communism... at one point I almost decided to abandon our conv[ersation] when he r[e]p[ea]t[e]d again and again in monotone that 'Iran w[ou]ld never, never want UK and US to have any differences over it. Iran w[ou]ld prefer [to] go Communist than cause any trouble between US and UK.'
  • Henderson، Loy (28 يوليو 1952). "The Ambassador in Iran (Henderson) to the Department of State, repeated to London". Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-04-13. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. At this point Mosadeq began to chant that Iran w[ou]ld prefer to go communist than for US and UN [UK] to have differences of opinion with regard to it. Eventually I was able to tell him that US choice was not merely between US-UK friction and Iran going Communist. I stressed that if serious misunderstandings sh[ou]ld develop in present world situation between US and UK, Iran would go Communist anyway.
  • Staff writer(s) (28 يوليو 1953). "FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1952–1954. IRAN, 1951–1954: VOLUME X No. 339 Editorial Note regarding Department of State Bulletin 10 August 1953, page 178". Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-08-01. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. Secretary Dulles held a press conference on July 28. In response to a reporter's question about the growing strength of the Tudeh Party in Iran, the Secretary replied as follows: 'Recent developments in Iran, especially the growing activity of the illegal Communist party, which appears to be tolerated by the Iranian Government have caused us concern. These developments make it more difficult for the United States to give assistance to Iran so long as its government tolerates this sort of activity.'
  • Gleason، Sarell (17 سبتمبر 1953). "No. 358 Memorandum of Discussion at the 160th Meeting of the National Security Council, Washington, August 27, 1953". Eisenhower Library, Eisenhower papers, Whitman file. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-10-15. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. Secretary [of State John Foster] Dulles commented that while what happened in Iran was spontaneous, he did feel obliged to say that a number of people in Iran had kept their heads and maintained their courage when the situation looked very tough... As a result of what had happened, Secretary Dulles informed the Council, the United States now had a 'second chance' in Iran when all hope of avoiding a Communist Iran appeared to have vanished.
  • Berry، Burton Y. (17 أغسطس 1953). "Telegram No. 343 The Ambassador in Iraq (Berry) to the Department of State". Office of the Historian of the U.S. Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-10-04. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. On the third day Mosadeq by some means had been alerted and had had the time to take successful countermeasures so that when the Colonel arrived at Mosadeq's house he was himself arrested...This morning the Shah left his Caspian Palace in a Beechcraft with a pilot, one Palace official and his Queen and landed in Baghdad at 10:15. He said that he thought that he should not stay here more than a few days, but would then go to Europe and he hoped eventually to America. He added he would be looking for work shortly as he has a large family and very small means outside of Iran. I tried to boost his morale by saying that I hoped that soon he would return to reign over his people for whom he had done so much, but he replied that Mosadeq was absolutely mad and insanely jealous, like a tiger who springs upon any living thing that it sees moving above him. Shah believes Mosadeq thinks he can form a partnership with the [Communist] Tudeh Party and then outwit it, but in so doing Mosadeq will become the Dr. [Edvard] Bene[š] of Iran.
  • Hughes، Thomas L. (28 يناير 1965). "67. Memorandum From the Director of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (Hughes) to Secretary of State Rusk; SUBJECT: The Significance of the Assassination of Prime Minister Hasan Ali Mansur". Johnson Library, National Security File, Robert W. Komer Files, Iran, 1965–March 1966. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-10-04. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. There is considerable discontent in Iran because of continued repression of opposition groups, exile of Ayatollah Khomeini, unpopular measures passed by the government such as the recent Status of Forces Bill, and the increase in the cost of basic fuels.
  • Staff writer(s) (مايو 1972). "Central Intelligence Agency\Directorate of Intelligence\Intelligence Report\Centers of Power in Iran". Source: Central Intelligence Agency, OCI Files, Job 79T00832A, Box 9, 46. Secret; No Foreign Dissem. Prepared in the Office of Current Intelligence and coordinated within CIA. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-03-27. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. [P]laying an essentially negative role at present... are the clergy, whose strength lies in the emotions of the Iranian masses and whose opposition to the Shah's government is nearly total...Detailed information on the clergy is not available. There are perhaps 100,000 clergymen ranging from the mullah, the lowest clerical post, to the mojtahed.

web.archive.org

  • Fars News Agency : بيخود نيست كه به ما شيطان بزرگ مي گويند نسخة محفوظة 24 سبتمبر 2017 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • Risen، James (16 أبريل 2000). "SECRETS OF HISTORY: The C.I.A. in Iran -- A special report.; How a Plot Convulsed Iran in '53 (and in '79)". The New York Times. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-09-02. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21.
  • Staff writer(s) (c. 1975). "The Battle for Iran (excerpt)". Central Intelligence Agency. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-12-17. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. Complete secrecy about the operation that was known under the cryptonym of TPAJAX has been impossible to enforce...[T]he military coup that overthrew Mosadeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.
  • Wilber، Donald (مارس 1954). "CIA Clandestine Service History, "Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran, November 1952-August 1953," March 1954, by Dr. Donald Wilber" (PDF). مؤرشف من الأصل (PDF) في 2017-07-19. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. In early summer of 1953 Carroll was assigned the task of planning military aspects of TPAJAX. Several assumptions first had to be taken into account: A. Operation would be joint operation with SIS.
  • Wilber، Donald (مارس 1954). "CIA Clandestine Service History, 'Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran, November 1952-August 1953,' March 1954, by Dr. Donald Wilber" (PDF). ص. iv. مؤرشف من الأصل (PDF) في 2017-08-07. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. An estimate entitled 'Factors Involved in the Overthrow of Mossadeq' was completed on 16 April 1953... In April it was determined that the CIA should conduct the envisioned operation jointly with the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS). By the end of April, it was decided that CIA and SIS officers would draw up a plan… which would be submitted to CIA and SIS Headquarters, and to the Department of State and the Foreign Office for final approval.
  • David M. Watry (10 ديسمبر 2014). Diplomacy at the Brink: Eisenhower, Churchill, and Eden in the Cold War. LSU Press. ص. 93. ISBN:978-0-8071-5719-0. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-08-24.
  • Acheson، Dean (7 فبراير 1952). "Telegram from The Secretary of State to the Embassy in Iran. (Memo of conversation 1 February 1952 between U.S. Department of State and British representatives regarding the Iranian political situation)". Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-04-12. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. Although Mosadeq [will] not likely turn toward Russia it is highly improbable that he will do anything [to] check communism in Iran since his ideas of polit[ical] tolerance, neutrality, and fear of offending [the] USSR w[ou]ld prevent his taking action vs Tudeh regardless [of the] outcome [of] the oil question and request[s for] US financial assistance.
  • Henderson، Loy (28 يوليو 1952). "The Ambassador in Iran (Henderson) to the Department of State, repeated to London". Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-04-13. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. ...I could not but be discouraged at [the] thought that [a] person [Mosadeq] so lacking in stability and clearly dominated by emotions and prejudices sh[ou]ld represent [the] only bulwark left between Iran and communism... at one point I almost decided to abandon our conv[ersation] when he r[e]p[ea]t[e]d again and again in monotone that 'Iran w[ou]ld never, never want UK and US to have any differences over it. Iran w[ou]ld prefer [to] go Communist than cause any trouble between US and UK.'
  • Henderson، Loy (28 يوليو 1952). "The Ambassador in Iran (Henderson) to the Department of State, repeated to London". Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-04-13. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. At this point Mosadeq began to chant that Iran w[ou]ld prefer to go communist than for US and UN [UK] to have differences of opinion with regard to it. Eventually I was able to tell him that US choice was not merely between US-UK friction and Iran going Communist. I stressed that if serious misunderstandings sh[ou]ld develop in present world situation between US and UK, Iran would go Communist anyway.
  • Staff writer(s) (28 يوليو 1953). "FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1952–1954. IRAN, 1951–1954: VOLUME X No. 339 Editorial Note regarding Department of State Bulletin 10 August 1953, page 178". Office of the Historian of the United States Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-08-01. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. Secretary Dulles held a press conference on July 28. In response to a reporter's question about the growing strength of the Tudeh Party in Iran, the Secretary replied as follows: 'Recent developments in Iran, especially the growing activity of the illegal Communist party, which appears to be tolerated by the Iranian Government have caused us concern. These developments make it more difficult for the United States to give assistance to Iran so long as its government tolerates this sort of activity.'
  • Gleason، Sarell (17 سبتمبر 1953). "No. 358 Memorandum of Discussion at the 160th Meeting of the National Security Council, Washington, August 27, 1953". Eisenhower Library, Eisenhower papers, Whitman file. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-10-15. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-20. Secretary [of State John Foster] Dulles commented that while what happened in Iran was spontaneous, he did feel obliged to say that a number of people in Iran had kept their heads and maintained their courage when the situation looked very tough... As a result of what had happened, Secretary Dulles informed the Council, the United States now had a 'second chance' in Iran when all hope of avoiding a Communist Iran appeared to have vanished.
  • Risen، James (16 أبريل 2000). "Key Events in the 1953 Coup". The New York Times. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-09-06. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. Aug. 16, 1953…The shah flees to Baghdad.
  • Berry، Burton Y. (17 أغسطس 1953). "Telegram No. 343 The Ambassador in Iraq (Berry) to the Department of State". Office of the Historian of the U.S. Department of State. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-10-04. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. On the third day Mosadeq by some means had been alerted and had had the time to take successful countermeasures so that when the Colonel arrived at Mosadeq's house he was himself arrested...This morning the Shah left his Caspian Palace in a Beechcraft with a pilot, one Palace official and his Queen and landed in Baghdad at 10:15. He said that he thought that he should not stay here more than a few days, but would then go to Europe and he hoped eventually to America. He added he would be looking for work shortly as he has a large family and very small means outside of Iran. I tried to boost his morale by saying that I hoped that soon he would return to reign over his people for whom he had done so much, but he replied that Mosadeq was absolutely mad and insanely jealous, like a tiger who springs upon any living thing that it sees moving above him. Shah believes Mosadeq thinks he can form a partnership with the [Communist] Tudeh Party and then outwit it, but in so doing Mosadeq will become the Dr. [Edvard] Bene[š] of Iran.
  • Carsten Stahn؛ Jennifer S. Easterday؛ Jens Iverson (13 فبراير 2014). Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. OUP Oxford. ص. 468. ISBN:978-0-19-150938-4. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-08-02. It is not uncommon for status questions to act as a lightning rod for…grievances of the local population…A vivid example is offered by Ayatollah Khomeini's speech of 26 October 1964 (Speech 16) denouncing the extension of diplomatic immunities to American military personnel in Iran.
  • Hughes، Thomas L. (28 يناير 1965). "67. Memorandum From the Director of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (Hughes) to Secretary of State Rusk; SUBJECT: The Significance of the Assassination of Prime Minister Hasan Ali Mansur". Johnson Library, National Security File, Robert W. Komer Files, Iran, 1965–March 1966. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-10-04. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. There is considerable discontent in Iran because of continued repression of opposition groups, exile of Ayatollah Khomeini, unpopular measures passed by the government such as the recent Status of Forces Bill, and the increase in the cost of basic fuels.
  • Staff writer(s) (2014). "Chronology: U.S.–Iran relations 1906-2002". PBS News\Frontline. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-04-19. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. 1964... Khomeini is exiled to Turkey for his outspoken denunciation of the shah's Status of Forces bill, which grants U.S. military personnel diplomatic immunity for crimes committed on Iranian soil.
  • Staff writer(s) (مايو 1972). "Central Intelligence Agency\Directorate of Intelligence\Intelligence Report\Centers of Power in Iran". Source: Central Intelligence Agency, OCI Files, Job 79T00832A, Box 9, 46. Secret; No Foreign Dissem. Prepared in the Office of Current Intelligence and coordinated within CIA. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-03-27. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. [P]laying an essentially negative role at present... are the clergy, whose strength lies in the emotions of the Iranian masses and whose opposition to the Shah's government is nearly total...Detailed information on the clergy is not available. There are perhaps 100,000 clergymen ranging from the mullah, the lowest clerical post, to the mojtahed.
  • Staff writer(s) (7 ديسمبر 2009). "How Iran's opposition inverts old slogans". BBC. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2010-01-02. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-05-21. One of the big anti-Shah chants ended with the slogan "Death to Shah!"...A main revolutionary cry was: "Estaghlal, Azadi, Jomhuriye Eslami" (Eng: Independence, Freedom, Islamic Republic).
  • Iran & the Great Satan نسخة محفوظة 2012-06-28 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • "This Week in History: Ayatollah Khomeini returns to Iran - Features". The Jerusalem Post. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-02-11.