Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Kontroverse um die globale Erwärmung (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Kontroverse um die globale Erwärmung" in German language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank German rank
60doi.org
2nd place
3rd place
52web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
16theguardian.com
12th place
25th place
13redirecter.toolforge.org
33rd place
2nd place
12IABotmemento.invalid
low place
low place
5washingtonpost.com
34th place
113th place
5sueddeutsche.de
226th place
12th place
5spiegel.de
66th place
4th place
4nytimes.com
7th place
19th place
3zeit.de
267th place
15th place
2nationalacademies.org
7,189th place
low place
2nature.com
234th place
203rd place
2welt.de
201st place
11th place
2youtube.com
9th place
9th place
2mdpi.com
2,912th place
1,242nd place
2pik-potsdam.de
low place
4,438th place
2scilogs.de
low place
low place
2bbc.co.uk
8th place
37th place
2mpg.de
1,624th place
377th place
1climatechange2013.org
low place
low place
1ipcc.ch
1,778th place
1,959th place
1yale.edu
565th place
897th place
1royalsociety.org
2,415th place
2,273rd place
1esf.org
low place
low place
1rmets.org
low place
low place
1amos.org.au
low place
low place
1cmos.ca
low place
low place
1aps.org
1,503rd place
1,243rd place
1wiley.com
222nd place
272nd place
1uwec.edu
low place
low place
1bundestag.de
1,137th place
74th place
1wissenslogs.de
low place
low place
1handelsblatt.com
1,065th place
65th place
1ucsusa.org
low place
low place
1grist.org
low place
low place
1newsweek.com
269th place
601st place
1nzz.ch
687th place
41st place
1margaretthatcher.org
low place
low place
1wetter.de
low place
low place
1pewresearch.org
1,418th place
2,535th place
1people-press.org
low place
low place
1epo.de
low place
low place
1uni-marburg.de
7,035th place
896th place
1europa.eu
68th place
29th place
1nasa.gov
75th place
133rd place
1pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com
low place
low place
1realclimate.org
low place
low place
1ornl.gov
5,534th place
8,060th place
1focus.de
460th place
28th place
1akadem.ru
low place
low place
1wesleyan.edu
7,995th place
9,671st place
1ucar.edu
7,843rd place
low place
1klimafakten.de
low place
low place
1aip.org
2,204th place
4,230th place
1findarticles.com
424th place
1,695th place
1tmgnow.com
low place
low place
1royalsocietypublishing.org
1,993rd place
973rd place
1stanford.edu
179th place
460th place
1arxiv.org
69th place
189th place
1idw-online.de
5,704th place
362nd place
1wissenschaft-online.de
low place
2,288th place
1iop.org
1,725th place
1,346th place
1timesonline.co.uk
241st place
759th place
1cce-review.org
low place
low place
1senate.gov
758th place
1,627th place
1dradio.de
4,066th place
262nd place
1aaup.org
low place
low place
1aaas.org
9,065th place
3,577th place
1cultura21.de
low place
low place
1sciencemag.org
857th place
511th place
1huffingtonpost.com
109th place
291st place
1scientificamerican.com
896th place
1,716th place
1thinkprogress.org
6,968th place
low place
1climatesciencewatch.org
low place
low place
1derstandard.at
743rd place
45th place
1livescience.com
1,190th place
2,175th place
1forbes.com
54th place
107th place
1foxnews.com
152nd place
430th place
1harvard.edu
18th place
181st place
1tagesanzeiger.ch
2,194th place
170th place
1reuters.com
49th place
151st place
1agenda21-treffpunkt.de
low place
low place
1faz.net
240th place
13th place
1manager-magazin.de
2,692nd place
192nd place
1lse.ac.uk
2,117th place
3,181st place
1economist.com
254th place
419th place
1nationalarchives.gov.uk
744th place
1,384th place
1theatlantic.com
228th place
655th place
1sense.nl
low place
low place
1taz.de
753rd place
43rd place
1telegraph.co.uk
30th place
92nd place
1gov.bc.ca
2,476th place
3,565th place
1fr.de
1,508th place
89th place
1pbl.nl
low place
low place
1interacademycouncil.net
low place
low place
1apa.org
1,220th place
2,215th place
1tagesspiegel.de
458th place
30th place

IABotmemento.invalid

aaas.org

aaup.org

agenda21-treffpunkt.de

aip.org

akadem.ru

forest.akadem.ru

  • Mukhtar Naurzbaev, Malcolm K. Hughes, Eugene A. Vaganov: Tree-ring Growth Curves as Sources of Climatic Information. In: Quaternary Research, 62, 2004, S. 126–133 (PDF; 324 kB).

amos.org.au

apa.org

aps.org

arxiv.org

bbc.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

  • Später, im Jahr 2003, äußerte sie Furcht, dass internationale Klimwaschutzbemühungen eine wunderbare Ausrede für einen weltweiten, übernationalen Sozialismus böten; siehe Roger Harrabin: Margaret Thatcher: How PM legitimised green concerns. BBC, 8. April 2013, abgerufen am 10. Juli 2015.

news.bbc.co.uk

bundestag.de

dipbt.bundestag.de

cce-review.org

climatechange2013.org

climatesciencewatch.org

cmos.ca

cultura21.de

magazin.cultura21.de

derstandard.at

doi.org

  • Naomi Oreskes: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. In: Science. Band 306, Nr. 5702, 2004, S. 1686, doi:10.1126/science.1103618.
  • Anderegg et al.: Expert credibility in climate change. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Band 107, Nr. 27, 2010, S. 12107–12109, doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107.
  • Cook et al.: Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. In: Environmental Research Letters. Band 8, 2013, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
  • Sven Ove Hansson: Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Band 63, 2017, S. 39–47, hier: S. 41 f., doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002.
  • Justin Farrell et al.: Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation. In: Nature Climate Change. Band 9, 2019, S. 191–195, doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6.
  • Editorial: Fake news threatens a climate literate world. In: Nature Communications. Band 8, 2017, S. 15460, doi:10.1038/ncomms15460.
  • Constantine Boussalis, Travis G. Coan: Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt. In: Global Environmental Change. Band 36, 2016, S. 89–100, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.001.
  • Jordi Xifra: Climate Change Deniers and Advocacy: A Situational Theory of Publics Approach. In: American Behavioral Scientist. Band 60, Nr. 3, 2016, S. 276–287, hier S. 284, doi:10.1177/0002764215613403.
  • Riley E. Dunlap, Peter J. Jacques: Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection. In: American Behavioral Scientist. Band 57, Nr. 6, 2013, S. 699–731, doi:10.1177/0002764213477096.
  • John Cook u. a.: Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. In: Environmental Research Letters. 2016, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
  • Peter T. Doran, Maggie Kendall Zimmermann: Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. In: Eos. 90. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, Januar 2009, S. 22–23, doi:10.1029/2009EO030002 (wiley.com [PDF]).
  • Stephen Farnsworth, S. Robert Lichter: The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change. In: Int. Journal of Public Opinion Research. 24. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, Oktober 2011, doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr033 (uwec.edu [PDF]).
  • Hans von Storch, Dennis G. Bray: Models, manifestation and attribution of climate change. In: Meteorology Hydrologie and Water Management. Januar 2017, doi:10.26491/mhwm/67388.
  • Rasmus E. Benestad: Learning from mistakes in climate research. In: Theoretical and Applied Climatology. Band 126, 2016, S. 699–703, doi:10.1007/s00704-015-1597-5.
  • Wouter Poortinga et al.: Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. In: Global Environmental Change 21, (2011), S. 1015–1024, hier S. 1016, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001.
  • Karin Edvardsson Björnberg u. a.: Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. Band 167, 2017, S. 229–241, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.066.
  • Sven Ove Hansson: Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Band 63, 2017, S. 39–47, doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002.
  • Justin Farrell: Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, Nr. 1, 2015, S. 92–97, doi:10.1073/pnas.1509433112.
  • Nick Watts et al.: Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health. In: The Lancet. Band 386, 2015, S. 1861–1914, S. 1901, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60854-6.
  • Robert J. Brulle: Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. In: Climatic Change. 2013, doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7.
  • Geoffrey Supran und Naomi Oreskes: Assessing ExxonMobil's climate change communications (1977–2014). In: Environmental Research Letters. Band 8, Nr. 12, 23. August 2017, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f.
  • Nature editorial, 12. Juli 2001, in: Nature, Vol. 412, Nr. 6843, S. 103, doi:10.1038/35084333. Frei übersetzt:

    „[…] Wissenschaft kann nur durch ihre starke Tradition der Debatte und Meinungsverschiedenheit fortschreiten. Aber diese spezielle Debatte diskreditiert den Begriff der wissenschaftlichen Meinungsverschiedenheit. Einige der Klimaskeptiker rufen Erinnerungen an die AIDS-Dissidenten hervor, die in den 1990er Jahren mit Hilfe von Begriffen behaupteten, dass HIV nicht AIDS verursachen würde und dass es keine AIDS-Pandemie in Afrika gäbe. Andere ähneln den Tabakindustrie-Dissidenten, die der Regulierung dieser Industrie bis zum Letzten widerstanden – auf der Grundlage dessen, was später als die falsche Darstellung der von den Zigarettenherstellern geförderten Wissenschaft entlarvt wurde.“

  • Neil Carter: Greening the mainstream: party politics and the environment. In: Environmental Politics. Band 22, Nr. 1, 2013, doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755391.
  • Aaron M. McCright, Riley E. Dunlap: Anti-reflexivity. The American Conservative Movement’s Success in Undermining Climate Science and Policy. In: Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2–3), 2010, S. 100–133, doi:10.1177/0263276409356001.
  • Matthew Lockwood: Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. In: Environmental Politics. April 2018, doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411.
  • Sondre Båtstrand: More than Markets: A Comparative Study of Nine Conservative Parties on Climate Change. In: Politics & Policy. Band 43, Nr. 4, 2015, S. 555–556, doi:10.1111/polp.12122.
  • Maxwell T. Boykoff, Jules M. Boykoff: Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. In: Global Environmental Change 14, 2004, 125–136, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001. In ihrer Studie über die Berichterstattung über den Klimawandel in der US-Qualitätspresse schreiben die Autoren, dass knapp 6 % der untersuchten Zeitungsartikel von klimatologischen, wissenschaftlichen Argumenten dominiert waren. Über 35 % boten eine „überwiegende“ Darstellung dieser Argumente, während knapp 53 % eine gemischte und vermeintlich „ausgewogene“ Darstellung wählten. Weitere 6 % verwendeten ausschließlich die Argumentation der Skeptiker.
  • Maxwell T. Boykoff: Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995–2004. In: Climatic Change, Vol. 86, Nr. 1–2, Januar 2008, doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9299-3.
  • Shaun W. Elsasser, Riley E. Dunlap: Leading Voices in the Denier Choir: Conservative Columnists’ Dismissal of Global Warming and Denigration of Climate Science. In: American Behavioral Scientist. Band 57, Nr. 6, 2013, doi:10.1177/000276421246980.
  • Beate M. W. Ratter, Katharina H. I. Philipp, Hans von Storch: Between hype and decline: recent trends in public perception of climate change. In: Environmental Science & Policy 18, April 2012, S. 3–8, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.12.007.
  • Aaron M. McCright, Riley E. Dunlap: Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. In: Global Environmental Change. Band 21, Nr. 4, Oktober 2011, S. 1163–1172, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003.
  • David E. Parker: Climate: Large-scale warming is not urban. In: Nature, Vol. 432, S. 290, 18. November 2004, doi:10.1038/432290a.
  • David E. Parker: A Demonstration That Large-Scale Warming Is Not Urban. In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 16, 2006, S. 2882–2895, doi:10.1175/JCLI3730.1.
  • C. A. Maers, F. J. Wentz: The Effect of Diurnal Correction on Satellite-Derived Lower Tropospheric Temperature. In: Science, 11. August 2005, doi:10.1126/science.1114772.
  • Steven Sherwood, John Lanzante, Cathryn Meyer: Radiosonde Daytime Biases and Late-20th Century Warming. In: Science, 11. August 2005, doi:10.1126/science.1115640.
  • Vgl. Spektrum der Wissenschaft 08/09, S. 16 f.; Hönisch et al.: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration Across the Mid-Pleistocene Transition, in: Science, Vol. 324., Nr. 5934, 19. Juni 2009, S. 1551–1554, doi:10.1126/science.1171477
  • F. Kaspar, N. Kühl, U. Cubasch, T. Litt: A model-data comparison of European temperatures in the Eemian interglacial. In: Geophysical Research Letters, 32, 2005, L11703, doi:10.1029/2005GL022456.
  • Dana L. Royer, Robert A. Berner, Jeffrey Park: Climate sensitivity constrained by CO2 concentrations over the past 420 million years. In: Nature, Vol. 446, 29. März 2007, doi:10.1038/nature05699 (PDF; 252 kB (Memento des Originals vom 25. Juni 2007 im Internet Archive)  Info: Der Archivlink wurde automatisch eingesetzt und noch nicht geprüft. Bitte prüfe Original- und Archivlink gemäß Anleitung und entferne dann diesen Hinweis.@1@2Vorlage:Webachiv/IABot/droyer.web.wesleyan.edu).
  • IPCC [T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, P.M. Midgley (eds.)]: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom / New York, NY, USA 2013, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324 (1535 S.).
  • P. Foukal, C. Fröhlich, H. Spruit, T. M. L. Wigley: Variations in solar luminosity and their effect on the Earth’s climate. In: Nature, 443, S. 161–166, 14. September 2006, doi:10.1038/nature05072.
  • Henrik Svensmark: Influence of Cosmic Rays on Earth’s Climate. In: Physical Review Letters, Bd. 81, 1998, S. 5027–5030, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5027 (html).
  • J. Shaviv: On climate response to changes in the cosmic ray flux and radiative budget. In: Journal of Geophysical Research, Bd. 110, No. A8, 2005, S. A08105.1 – A08105.15, doi:10.1029/2004JA010866.
  • Gordon et al.: Causes and importance of new particle formation in the present-day and preindustrial atmospheres. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. Band 122, Nr. 16, 2017, S. 8739–8760, doi:10.1002/2017JD026844.
  • J.R. Pierce: Cosmic rays, aerosols, clouds, and climate: Recent findings from the CLOUD experiment. In: Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres. Band 122, Nr. 16, 2017, S. 8051–8055, doi:10.1002/2017JD027475.
  • I. G. Richardson, E. W. Cliver, H. V. Cane: Long-term trends in interplanetary magnetic field strength and solar wind structure during the twentieth century. J. Geophys. Res., 107(A10), 2002, S. 1304, doi:10.1029/2001JA000507.
  • Peter Laut: Solar activity and terrestrial climate: an analysis of some purported correlations. In: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Bd. 65, 2003, S. 801–812, doi:10.1016/S1364-6826(03)00041-5 (PDF; 263 kB).
  • Amato T. Evan, Andrew K. Heidinger, Daniel J. Vimont: Arguments against a physical long-term trend in global ISCCP cloud amounts. In: Geophysical Research Letters, Bd. 34, 2007, L04701, doi:10.1029/2006GL028083.
  • T. Sloan, A.W. Wolfendale: Testing the proposed causal link between cosmic rays and cloud cover. In: Environ. Res. Lett., Bd. 3, 2008, 024001, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/024001 (PDF, preprint; 600 kB).
  • J. Calogovic, C. Albert, F. Arnold, J. Beer, L. Desorgher, E. O. Flueckiger: Sudden cosmic ray decreases: No change of global cloud cover. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, 2010, L03802, doi:10.1029/2009GL041327. Siehe auch: Wolkenbedeckung unbeeinflusst von kosmischer Strahlung, Informationsdienst Wissenschaft, 9. März 2010 und Kosmische Strahlung macht keine Wolken, Spektrumdirekt, 10. März 2010.
  • A.D. Erlykin, T. Sloan, A.W. Wolfendale: Solar activity and the mean global temperature. In: Environmental Research Letters, Bd. 4, 2009, 014006, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014006 (PDF)
  • Jeffrey D. Sachs (2004): Seeking a global solution, in: Nature, Vol. 430, S. 725–726, doi:10.1038/430725a.
  • Ackerman et al. (2009): Did the Stern Review underestimate U.S. and global climate damages? In: Energy Policy 37: 2717–2721; doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.011.
  • Maxwell T. Boykoff, Jules M. Boykoff: Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. In: Global Environmental Change. Band 14, 2004, S. 125–136, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001.
  • Janet K. Swim et al.: Psychology’s Contributions to Understanding and Addressing Global Climate Change. In: American Psychologist. 66 (4), 2011, S. 241–250, doi:10.1037/a0023220.
  • Matthew Vess, Jamie Arndt: The nature of death and the death of nature: The impact of mortality salience on environmental concern. In: Journal of Research in Personality. 42 (5), 2008, S. 1376–1380, doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.007.
  • David V. Budescu, Stephen Broomell, Han-Hui Por: Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Psychological Science. 20 (3), 2009, S. 299–308, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02284.x.
  • Ye Li, Eric J. Johnson, Lisa Zaval: Local Warming: Daily Temperature Change Influences Belief in Global Warming. In: Psychological Science. 22 (4), S. 454–459, doi:10.1177/0956797611400913.
  • Patrick J. Egan, Megan Mullin: Turning Personal Experience into Political Attitudes: The Effect of Local Weather on Americans’ Perceptions about Global Warming. In: The Journal of Politics. 73 (3), 2012, S. 796–809, doi:10.1017/S0022381612000448.
  • Nicolas Guéguen: Dead indoor plants strengthen belief in global warming. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology. 32 (2), 2012, S. 173–177, doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.002.
  • Paul G. Bain, Matthew J. Hornsey, Renata Bongiorno, Carla Jeffries: Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. In: Nature Climate Change. 2, Juni 2012, S. 600–603, doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1532.

dradio.de

economist.com

epo.de

esf.org

europa.eu

europarl.europa.eu

  • Europäisches Parlament, Europäische Kommission (Hrsg.): Spezial Eurobarometer 313. Die Einstellung der Europäer gegenüber dem Klimawandel. Juli 2009 (europa.eu [PDF]).

faz.net

findarticles.com

  • “Models and empirical observations are both indispensable tools of science, yet when discrepancies arise, observations should carry greater weight than theory.” (In: J. Veizer: Celestial climate driver: a perspective from four billion years of the carbon cycle. In: Geoscience Canada, März 2005 ([1])).

focus.de

forbes.com

foxnews.com

fr.de

gov.bc.ca

courts.gov.bc.ca

grist.org

  • Ross Gelbspan (2004): Boiling Point. How Politicians, Big Oil and Coal, Journalists, and Activists Have Fueled the Climate Crisis – and What We Can Do to Avert Disaster. ISBN 0-465-02762-8 (Exzerpt (englisch)).

handelsblatt.com

harvard.edu

news.harvard.edu

huffingtonpost.com

idw-online.de

interacademycouncil.net

reviewipcc.interacademycouncil.net

iop.org

iopscience.iop.org

  • A.D. Erlykin, T. Sloan, A.W. Wolfendale: Solar activity and the mean global temperature. In: Environmental Research Letters, Bd. 4, 2009, 014006, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014006 (PDF)

ipcc.ch

  • Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Archiviert vom Original am 4. August 2018; abgerufen am 5. Februar 2021.  Info: Der Archivlink wurde automatisch eingesetzt und noch nicht geprüft. Bitte prüfe Original- und Archivlink gemäß Anleitung und entferne dann diesen Hinweis.@1@2Vorlage:Webachiv/IABot/www.ipcc.ch oder IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Summary for Policymakers. (PDF; 3,9 MB) auf ipcc.ch (englisch)

klimafakten.de

livescience.com

lse.ac.uk

manager-magazin.de

margaretthatcher.org

mdpi.com

  • Roy W. Spencer und William D. Braswell (2011): On the Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedbacks from Variations in Earth’s Radiant Energy Balance, in: Remote Sensing, Vol. 3, No. 8, S. 1603–1613 online
  • Wolfgang Wagner (2011): Taking Responsibility on Publishing the Controversial Paper “On the Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedbacks from Variations in Earth’s Radiant Energy Balance” by Spencer and Braswell, Remote Sens. 2011, 3(8), 1603–1613, in: Remote Sensing, Vol. 3, No. 9, S. 2002–2004, online

mpg.de

mpg.de

mps.mpg.de

nasa.gov

giss.nasa.gov

nationalacademies.org

nationalarchives.gov.uk

webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk

nature.com

newsweek.com

nytimes.com

nzz.ch

ornl.gov

cdiac.esd.ornl.gov

pbl.nl

people-press.org

pewresearch.org

pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com

  • R. A. Pielke Sr. et al.: Documentation of uncertainties and biases associated with surface temperature measurement sites for climate change assessment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 88:6, 2007, S. 913–928 (PDF; 2,7 MB).

pik-potsdam.de

realclimate.org

redirecter.toolforge.org

reuters.com

rmets.org

royalsociety.org

  • The Royal Society (Hrsg.) (2005): Joint science academies’ statement: Global response to climate change, Ref 08/05 (PDF; 406 kB)

royalsocietypublishing.org

rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org

  • M. Lockwood, C. Fröhlich: Recent oppositely directed trends in solar climate forcings and the global mean surface air temperature. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2007, S. 1382 (PDF; 604 kB).

sciencemag.org

news.sciencemag.org

scientificamerican.com

blogs.scientificamerican.com

scilogs.de

senate.gov

epw.senate.gov

sense.nl

spiegel.de

stanford.edu

stephenschneider.stanford.edu

  • Peter Laut: Solar activity and terrestrial climate: an analysis of some purported correlations. In: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Bd. 65, 2003, S. 801–812, doi:10.1016/S1364-6826(03)00041-5 (PDF; 263 kB).

sueddeutsche.de

tagesanzeiger.ch

tagesspiegel.de

taz.de

telegraph.co.uk

theatlantic.com

theguardian.com

thinkprogress.org

timesonline.co.uk

tmgnow.com

ucar.edu

cgd.ucar.edu

  • Gerald A. Meehl, Warren M. Washington, Caspar M Ammann, Julie M. Arblaster, T. M. L. Wigleiy, Claudia Tebaldi: Combinations of Natural and Anthropogenic Forcings in Twentieth-Century Climate. In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 17, No. 19, 1. Oktober 2004, S. 3721–3727 (PDF; 368 kB (Memento des Originals vom 17. Dezember 2008 im Internet Archive)  Info: Der Archivlink wurde automatisch eingesetzt und noch nicht geprüft. Bitte prüfe Original- und Archivlink gemäß Anleitung und entferne dann diesen Hinweis.@1@2Vorlage:Webachiv/IABot/www.cgd.ucar.edu).

ucsusa.org

uni-marburg.de

  • On the relevance of ideological identification and environmental values for beliefs and attitudes toward climate change: An empirical cross country analysis. In: Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics. 2015 (uni-marburg.de [PDF]).

uwec.edu

people.uwec.edu

  • Stephen Farnsworth, S. Robert Lichter: The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change. In: Int. Journal of Public Opinion Research. 24. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, Oktober 2011, doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr033 (uwec.edu [PDF]).

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

welt.de

wesleyan.edu

droyer.web.wesleyan.edu

wetter.de

wiley.com

agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

  • Peter T. Doran, Maggie Kendall Zimmermann: Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. In: Eos. 90. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, Januar 2009, S. 22–23, doi:10.1029/2009EO030002 (wiley.com [PDF]).

wissenschaft-online.de

wissenslogs.de

yale.edu

climatecommunication.yale.edu

youtube.com

zeit.de