Jutta von Campenhausen: Wissenschaft vermitteln: Eine Anleitung für Wissenschaftler. 2014, Kap. 3: Sei nicht so ein Wissenschaftler!, doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19361-8_3, 3.1 Wie man Menschen erreicht, S. 29 (books.google.com).
doi.org
Anna Durnová: Der ‚March for Science‘ als Schauplatz der gesellschaftspolitischen Polarisierung zwischen Elite und Volk: ein interpretativer Beitrag zur Analyse von Postfaktizität. In: Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. Band29, Nr.2, 2019, S.345–360, doi:10.1007/s41358-019-00186-3.
Michael A. Peters, Tina Besley: Education and the New Dark Ages? Conspiracy, social media and science denial. In: Access: Contemporary Issues in Education. Band40, Nr.1, 2020, S.5–14, doi:10.46786/ac20.3082.
Stephan Lewandowsky u. a.: NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science. In: Psychological Science. Band24, Nr.5, 2013, S.622–633, doi:10.1177/0956797612457686.
Matthew H. Slater et al.: Denialism as Applied Skepticism: Philosophical and Empirical Considerations. In: Erkenntnis. Band85, 2020, S.871–890, doi:10.1007/s10670-018-0054-0.
Henning Hopf et al.: Fake science and the knowledge crisis: ignorance can be fatal. In: Royal Society Open Science. Band6, Nr.5, 2019, doi:10.1098/rsos.190161.
James C. Russell, Tim M. Blackburn: The Rise of Invasive Species Denialism. In: Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Band32, Nr.1, 2017, S.3–6, doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.012.
Karin Edvardsson Björnberg et al.: Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. Band167, 2017, S.229–241, hier: S. 235, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.066.
Riley E. Dunlap, Peter J. Jacques: Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection. In: American Behavioral Scientist. Band57, Nr.6, 2013, S.699–731, hier: S. 699, doi:10.1177/0002764213477096.
Stephan Lewandowsky u. a.: NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science. In: Psychological Science. Band24, Nr.5, 2013, S.622–633, hier: S. 623, doi:10.1177/0956797612457686.
Philipp Schmid, Cornelia Betsch: Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. In: Nature Human Behavior. Band3, 2019, S.931–939, doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4.
Jeremy Kemp et al.: Sceptics and deniers of climate change not to be confused. In: Nature. Nr.464, 2010, S.673, doi:10.1038/464673a.
Stephan Lewandowsky, Klaus Oberauer: Motivated Rejection of Science. In: Current Directions in Psychological Science. Band25, Nr.4, 2016, S.217–222, doi:10.1177/0963721416654436.
Martin McKee et al.: Are Populist Leaders Creating the Conditions for the Spread of COVID-19? In: International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2020, doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.124.
Francisco Ortega, Michael Orsini: Governing COVID-19 without government in Brazil: Ignorance, neoliberal authoritarianism, and the collapse of public health leadership. In: Global Public Health. Band15, Nr.9, 2020, S.1257–1277, doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1795223.
Karin Edvardsson Björnberg et al.: Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. Band167, 2017, S.229–241, hier: S. 236, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.066.
Bruce W. Jentleson: Global Governance, the United Nations, and the Challenge of Trumping Trump. In: Global Governance. Band23, 2017, S.143–149, doi:10.1163/19426720-02302001.
Lindsey Dillon et al.: The Environmental Protection Agency in the Early Trump Administration: Prelude to Regulatory Capture. In: American Journal of Public Health. Band108, S2, 2018, S.S89–S94, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304360.
David Michaels: Manufactured Uncertainty. Protecting Public Health in the Age of Contested Science and Product Defense. In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Band1076, 2006, S.149–162, doi:10.1196/annals.1371.058.; Vgl. auch Robert Brulle: Denialism: organized opposition to climate change action in the United States. In: David Konisky (Hrsg.): Handbook of Enviromental Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton MA 2020, S. 328–341, hier: S. 333.
Jennifer S. Mindell et al.: All in this together: the corporate capture of public health. In: BMJ. Band345, 2012, doi:10.1136/bmj.e8082.
William C. Tucker: Deceitful Tongues: Is Climate Change Denial A Crime? In: Ecology Law Quarterly. Band39, 2012, S.831–892, hier: S. 891, doi:10.15779/Z38V55M.
Peter J. Jacques et al.: The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. In: Environmental Politics. Band17, Nr.3, 2008, S.349–385, doi:10.1080/09644010802055576.
Seth Heald: Climate Silence, Moral Disengagement, and Self-Efficacy: How Albert Bandura’s Theories Inform Our Climate-Change Predicament. In: Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. Band59, Nr.6, 2017, S.4–15, doi:10.1080/00139157.2017.1374792.
John Cook et al.: Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. In: PLOS ONE. Band12, Nr.5, 2017, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799.
Gordon Pennycook, Bence Bago, Jonathon McPhetres: Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 4. August 2022, ISSN1939-2222, doi:10.1037/xge0001267.
Jutta von Campenhausen: Wissenschaft vermitteln: Eine Anleitung für Wissenschaftler. 2014, Kap. 3: Sei nicht so ein Wissenschaftler!, doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19361-8_3, 3.1 Wie man Menschen erreicht, S. 29 (books.google.com).
Edmund Husserl: Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. In: Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Phänomenologische Forschung. Band 10. Max Niemeyer, Halle an der Saale 1929, urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-opus-60050, S. 1f.
nzma.org.nz
Alan McLintic: The motivations behind science denial. In: The New Zealand Medical Journal. Band132, Nr.1504, 2019, S.88–94, hier: S. 88 (org.nz).
Gordon Pennycook, Bence Bago, Jonathon McPhetres: Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 4. August 2022, ISSN1939-2222, doi:10.1037/xge0001267.