Atheism (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Atheism" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
2nd place
2nd place
325th place
255th place
6th place
6th place
179th place
183rd place
11th place
8th place
4th place
4th place
27th place
51st place
low place
low place
26th place
20th place
926th place
945th place
1,379th place
1,175th place
40th place
58th place
70th place
63rd place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
68th place
117th place
low place
7,508th place
209th place
191st place
8th place
10th place
61st place
54th place
3,884th place
2,182nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,418th place
966th place
102nd place
76th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
489th place
377th place
305th place
264th place
109th place
87th place
614th place
572nd place
6,465th place
4,591st place
1,865th place
1,260th place
low place
low place
222nd place
297th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
34th place
27th place
12th place
11th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,384th place
low place
low place
1,110th place
695th place
230th place
214th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
105th place
79th place
287th place
321st place
3,103rd place
2,242nd place
1,879th place
5,012th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7th place
7th place
28th place
26th place
1,108th place
661st place
2,526th place
1,796th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,146th place
683rd place
92nd place
72nd place
low place
low place
653rd place
498th place
1,961st place
1,303rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,599th place
3,485th place
1,107th place
652nd place
low place
8,340th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,190th place
959th place
1,544th place
1,128th place
3,337th place
3,444th place
18th place
17th place
low place
low place

abs.gov.au

amazon.com

  • Stein, Rebecca L.; Stein, Phillip L. (2007). The Anthropology of Religion, Witchcraft, and Magic (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon. p. 219. ASIN B004VX3Z6S.

archive.org

atheistalliance.org

atheistzone.com

bbc.co.uk

books.google.com

britannica.com

buddhistinformation.com

  • V.A. Gunasekara, "The Buddhist Attitude to God". Archived from the original on January 2, 2008. In the Bhuridatta Jataka, "The Buddha argues that the three most commonly given attributes of God, viz. omnipotence, omniscience and benevolence towards humanity cannot all be mutually compatible with the existential fact of dukkha."

cambridge.org

  • Oppy 2018, p. 4: Agnostics are distinguished from innocents, who also neither believe that there are gods nor believe that there are no gods, by the fact that they have given consideration to the question of whether there are gods. Innocents are those who have never considered the question of whether there are gods. Typically, innocents have never considered the question of whether there are gods because they are not able to consider that question. How could that be? Well, in order to consider the question of whether there are gods, one must understand what it would mean for something to be a god. That is, one needs to have the concept of a god. Those who lack the concept of a god are not able to entertain the thought that there are gods. Consider, for example, one-month-old babies. It is very plausible that one-month-old babies lack the concept of a god. So it is very plausible that one-month-old babies are innocents. Other plausible cases of innocents include chimpanzees, human beings who have suffered severe traumatic brain injuries, and human beings with advanced dementia Oppy, Graham (2018). Atheism and Agnosticism. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108555340. ISBN 978-1-108-55534-0. Archived from the original on February 27, 2021. Retrieved June 9, 2018.

catholiceducation.org

christiantoday.com

cnn.com

colorado.edu

deseretnews.com

doi.org

edge.org

etymonline.com

europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

exchristian.net

articles.exchristian.net

fulltextarchive.com

gazeta.pl

wiadomosci.gazeta.pl

gos_in_the_Neoogle.com

gutenberg.org

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

hdiplo.org

huffingtonpost.co.uk

huffingtonpost.com

iheu.org

infidels.org

jstor.org

livescience.com

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

madison.com

host.madison.com

merriam-webster.com

  • "Atheism". Encyclopædia Britannica Concise. Merriam Webster. Archived from the original on January 21, 2012. Retrieved December 15, 2011. Critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or divine beings. Unlike agnosticism, which leaves open the question of whether there is a God, atheism is a positive denial. It is rooted in an array of philosophical systems.
  • Merriam-Webster Online:Atheism, archived from the original on November 21, 2013, retrieved November 21, 2013, First Known Use: 1546

newhumanist.org.uk

newstatesman.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

norc.org

npr.org

nytimes.com

openlibrary.org

oxfordbibliographies.com

pdcnet.org

pewforum.org

pewresearch.org

philosophynow.org

  • Michael Anthony. "Where's The Evidence". Philosophy Now. Archived from the original on September 26, 2019. Retrieved October 24, 2021. While the word 'atheism' has been used in something like this sense (see for example Antony Flew's article 'The Presumption of Atheism'), it is a highly non-standard use.
  • Michael Anthony. "Where's The Evidence". Philosophy Now. Archived from the original on September 26, 2019. Retrieved October 24, 2021. While the word 'atheism' has been used in something like this sense (see for example Antony Flew's article 'The Presumption of Atheism'), it is a highly non-standard use.

philpapers.org

  • Bourget, David; Chalmers, David. "The PhilPapers Surveys". PhilPapers. The PhilPapers Foundation. Archived from the original on July 23, 2019. Retrieved April 13, 2021.

pitzer.edu

dwardmac.pitzer.edu

pitweb.pitzer.edu

positiveatheism.org

pragmatism.org

shook.pragmatism.org

prri.org

psyarxiv.com

psychologytoday.com

ptta.pl

qz.com

redcresearch.ie

religion-online.org

samharris.org

sdsmt.edu

sdsu.edu

reason.sdsu.edu

  • Winfried Schröder, in: Matthias Knutzen: Schriften und Materialien (2010), p. 8. See also Rececca Moore, The Heritage of Western Humanism, Scepticism and Freethought (2011), calling Knutzen "the first open advocate of a modern atheist perspective" online here Archived March 30, 2012, at the Wayback Machine

secularhumanism.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

sjdm.org

journal.sjdm.org

sneps.net

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Paul Draper. "Atheism and Agnosticism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on October 25, 2021. Retrieved October 24, 2021. Departing even more radically from the norm in philosophy, a few philosophers and quite a few non-philosophers claim that "atheism" shouldn't be defined as a proposition at all, even if theism is a proposition. Instead, "atheism" should be defined as a psychological state: the state of not believing in the existence of God
  • Paul Draper. "Atheism and Agnosticism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on October 25, 2021. Retrieved October 24, 2021. Departing even more radically from the norm in philosophy, a few philosophers and quite a few non-philosophers claim that "atheism" shouldn't be defined as a proposition at all, even if theism is a proposition. Instead, "atheism" should be defined as a psychological state: the state of not believing in the existence of God
  • Smart, J.C.C. (March 9, 2004). "Atheism and Agnosticism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on February 5, 2012. Retrieved April 9, 2011.
  • Stoljar, Daniel. "Physicalism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Archived from the original on November 3, 2019. Retrieved April 14, 2021.
  • Stubenberg, Stubenberg. "Neutral Monism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Archived from the original on December 11, 2017. Retrieved April 14, 2021.
  • Papineau, David. "Naturalism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Archived from the original on April 26, 2018. Retrieved April 14, 2021.
  • "Epicurus (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)". Plato.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on June 3, 2012. Retrieved November 10, 2013.
  • While strongly critical of revealed religion, Abu Bakr al-Razi did accept the existence of God, who was one of his five 'eternal principles' (next to soul, matter, time, and place); see Adamson 2021. Whether Muhammad al Warraq and Ibn al-Rawandi were merely skeptical freethinkers or full-blown atheists is not clear; see Stroumsa 1999. Adamson, Peter (2021). "Abu Bakr al-Razi". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stroumsa, Sarah (1999). Freethinkers of Medieval Islam: Ibn al-Rāwandī, Abū Bakr al-Rāzī, and Their Impact on Islamic Thought. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-11374-9.

stats.govt.nz

tabahfoundation.org

mmgsurvey.tabahfoundation.org

thefreedictionary.com

  • "atheist". American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. 2009. Archived from the original on November 27, 2013. Retrieved November 21, 2013.

theguardian.com

time.com

content.time.com

truthdig.com

  • Harris, Sam (2005). "An Atheist Manifesto". Truthdig. Archived from the original on May 16, 2011. Retrieved April 9, 2011. In a world riven by ignorance, only the atheist refuses to deny the obvious: Religious faith promotes human violence to an astonishing degree.

uchicago.edu

penelope.uchicago.edu

uni-muenchen.de

mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

vermontlaw.edu

lawreview.vermontlaw.edu

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

  • Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Atheism" . Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. The term as generally used, however, is highly ambiguous. Its meaning varies (a) according to the various definitions of deity, and especially (b) according as it is (i.) deliberately adopted by a thinker as a description of his own theological standpoint, or (ii.) applied by one set of thinkers to their opponents. As to (a), it is obvious that atheism from the standpoint of the Christian is a very different conception as compared with atheism as understood by a Deist, a Positivist, a follower of Euhemerus or Herbert Spencer, or a Buddhist.
  • Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Atheism" . Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. But dogmatic atheism is rare compared with the sceptical type, which is identical with agnosticism in so far as it denies the capacity of the mind of man to form any conception of God, but is different from it in so far as the agnostic merely holds his judgment in suspense, though, in practice, agnosticism is apt to result in an attitude towards religion which is hardly distinguishable from a passive and unaggressive atheism.
  • Hume 1748, Part III: "If we take in our hand any volume; of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion." Hume, David (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding . London.
  • Hume 1779. Hume, David (1779). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion . London. OL 7145748M.
  • Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Atheism" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

wingia.com

worldcat.org

worldvaluessurvey.org

  • "WVS Database". World Values Survey. Institute for Comparative Survey Research. March 2015. Archived from the original on January 5, 2016. Retrieved January 7, 2016.

wpunj.edu

nova.wpunj.edu