Compact theory (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Compact theory" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
27th place
51st place
476th place
282nd place
low place
low place
312th place
197th place
3,618th place
1,954th place
634th place
432nd place
330th place
222nd place
1st place
1st place
28th place
26th place

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; English: 26th place)

edition.cnn.com

freedomformula.us (Global: low place; English: low place)

politico.com (Global: 312th place; English: 197th place)

texastribune.org (Global: 3,618th place; English: 1,954th place)

thedailybeast.com (Global: 330th place; English: 222nd place)

thehill.com (Global: 476th place; English: 282nd place)

usnews.com (Global: 634th place; English: 432nd place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

wikisource.org (Global: 27th place; English: 51st place)

en.wikisource.org

  • Kentucky Resolutions of 1798; see also "Reclaiming the American Revolution," Wm. J. Watkins, Jr.,Palgrave MacMillan, 2008, p.165.
  • Webster's Second Reply to Hayne, January 26, 1830
  • "[T]he sovereign powers delegated are divided between the General and State Governments, and that the latter bold their portion by the same tenure as the former, it would seem impossible to deny to the States the right of deciding on the infractions of their powers, and the proper remedy to be applied for their correction. The right of judging, in such cases, is an essential attribute of sovereignty, of which the States cannot be divested without losing their sovereignty itself, and being reduced to a subordinate corporate condition. In fact, to divide power, and to give to one of the parties the exclusive right of judging of the portion allotted to each, is, in reality, not to divide it at all; and to reserve such exclusive right to the General Government (it matters not by what department to be exercised), is to convert it, in fact, into a great consolidated government, with unlimited powers, and to divest the States, in reality, of all their rights.... But the existence of the right of judging of their powers, so clearly established from the sovereignty of States, as clearly implies a veto or control, within its limits, on the action of the General Government, on contested points of authority.... May the General Government... encroach on the rights reserved to the States respectively? To the States respectively each in its sovereign capacity is reserved the power, by its veto, or right of interposition, to arrest the encroachment." South Carolina Exposition and Protest, 1828
  • For example, South Carolina's statement of secession stated: "Thus was established, by compact between the States, a Government with definite objects and powers, limited to the express words of the grant.... [T]he constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.... Those States have assumed the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection." Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union, 1860