Giles Rich (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Giles Rich" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2,852nd place
1,508th place
70th place
63rd place
529th place
314th place
34th place
27th place
7th place
7th place
441st place
311th place
22nd place
19th place
7,096th place
4,044th place
low place
low place
702nd place
520th place
332nd place
246th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
4,134th place
2,609th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,459th place
991st place
580th place
462nd place
2nd place
2nd place

americanbar.org

berkeley.edu

scholarship.law.berkeley.edu

bna.com

ipcenter.bna.com

  • See, for example, R. Hulse, Patentability of Computer Software After State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.: Evisceration of the Subject Matter Requirement, 33 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 491 (2000); Pamela Samuelson, A Manifesto Concerning the Legal Protection of Computer Programs, 94 Colum. L. Rev. 2308 (1994); Rafael X. Zahralddin, The Effect of Broad Patent Scope on the Competitiveness of United States Industry, 17 DEL. J. CORP. L. 949 (1992); Pamela Samuelson, Benson Revisited: The Case Against Patent Protection for Algorithms and Other Computer Program-Related Inventions, 39 EMORY L.J. 1025 (1990). See also Law School Symposium[permanent dead link],("[Professor] Sarnoff denounced as 'judicial activism' the Chakrabarty court's expansion of statutory language.”).

case.edu

law.case.edu

  • See Giles S. Rich, Congressional Intent – Or, Who Wrote the Patent Act of 1952?, in Patent Procurement and Exploitation (BNA 1963). The answer was "we did," meaning the drafting committee of patent lawyers urging passage of a revised patent act. In that article and a paper entitled The Vague Concept of Invention as Replaced by Section 103 of the 1952 Patent Act[permanent dead link], Judge Rich argued: “The intent with respect to the Patent Act of 1952 was the intent of a subcommittee to pass a bill prepared by patent lawyers as agreed to by a codification council, committee council and member of the subcommittee after the countless discussions and hearings.”

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

doi.org

federalcircuithistoricalsociety.org

fjc.gov

hathitrust.org

babel.hathitrust.org

house.gov

library.clerk.house.gov

uscode.house.gov

innsofcourt.org

inns.innsofcourt.org

iphalloffame.com

ipmall.info

jmls.edu

repository.jmls.edu

latimes.com

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

  • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: A History: 1990–2002. Compiled by members of the Advisory Council to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in celebration of the court's twentieth anniversary. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. 2004. LCCN 2004050209.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)

hdl.loc.gov

  • Biographical Note (November 2014). Giles S. Rich Papers. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress. pp. 3–4. Retrieved 6 August 2016.

nytimes.com

upenn.edu

scholarship.law.upenn.edu

uspto.gov

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org