Killian documents controversy (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Killian documents controversy" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

28cbsnews.com

108^th place

80^th place

22web.archive.org

1^st place

14washingtonpost.com

34^th place

27^th place

10usatoday.com

41^st place

34^th place

6nytimes.com

7^th place

5weeklystandard.com

5,987^th place

3,757^th place

4go.com

48^th place

39^th place

4boston.com

310^th place

208^th place

3archive.today

14^th place

3foxnews.com

152^nd place

120^th place

2nbcnews.com

137^th place

101^st place

2onlinejournal.com

low place

2time.com

61^st place

54^th place

2latimes.com

22^nd place

19^th place

2aim.org

low place

2dallasnews.com

757^th place

455^th place

2observer.com

760^th place

494^th place

2cnn.com

28^th place

26^th place

1harvard.edu

18^th place

17^th place

1pbs.org

198^th place

154^th place

1creativepro.com

low place

1freerepublic.com

low place

1hollywoodreporter.com

15^th place

16^th place

1baltimoresun.com

453^rd place

267^th place

1ajc.com

685^th place

404^th place

1nwsource.com

907^th place

580^th place

1salon.com

456^th place

300^th place

1nationalreview.com

1,698^th place

987^th place

1seattletimes.com

519^th place

316^th place

1sfgate.com

166^th place

121^st place

1ibm.com

1,131^st place

850^th place

1washingtonmonthly.com

6,093^rd place

3,721^st place

1chron.com

599^th place

369^th place

1opinionjournal.com

low place

8,848^th place

1archives.gov

446^th place

308^th place

1huffingtonpost.com

109^th place

87^th place

1wistv.com

low place

9,543^rd place

1newsobserver.com

2,370^th place

1,294^th place

1aolcdn.com

low place

1yahoo.com

38^th place

40^th place

1washingtontimes.com

1,029^th place

657^th place

1recordonline.com

6,105^th place

3,394^th place

1washtimes.com

low place

1newyorker.com

146^th place

110^th place

aim.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Roger Aronoff (November 4, 2005), AIM to Honor People in Pajamas, retrieved February 14, 2017
"Annual Reed Irvine Awards". Accuracy in Media. Retrieved February 10, 2017. Jim Hoft, Proprietor of Gateway Pundit

ajc.com (Global: 685^th place; English: 404^th place)

Baxter, Tom (September 19, 2004). "Atlantan challenged CBS documents first". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on September 3, 2005.

aolcdn.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

A PDF copy of the suit can be found on at [2].

archive.today (Global: 14^th place; English: 14^th place)

See Ripley, Amanda (September 13, 2004). "The X Files Of Lt. Bush: A flurry of contested memos and memories sheds more heat than light on his record". Time Magazine. Archived from the original on January 4, 2013. Retrieved March 25, 2008. and Dobbs, Michael (September 12, 2004). "Gaps in Service Continue to Dog Bush". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
Slover, Pete (September 11, 2004). "Authenticity of memo to 'sugar coat' Bush record is further questioned". Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on September 12, 2005. Retrieved March 24, 2008. The Seattle Times also published this story as "More challenges about whether Bush documents are authentic". The archived DallasNews.com article requires JavaScript to be disabled to work; a permalinked version of the link with all scripts disabled is here.
Slover, Pete. "Ex-aide disavows Bush Guard memos". Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on September 18, 2004. The archived link works only with JavaScript disabled in the browser; a version with all scripts disabled is here.

archives.gov (Global: 446^th place; English: 308^th place)

georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov

"Scott McClellan briefing, September 15, 2004, at". Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov. September 15, 2004. Retrieved May 24, 2010.

baltimoresun.com (Global: 453^rd place; English: 267^th place)

David Folkenflik (September 13, 2004). "Rather's doubters unmoved". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved March 17, 2008.

boston.com (Global: 310^th place; English: 208^th place)

Michael Rezendes (February 13, 2004). "Doubts raised on Bush accuser". Boston Globe online. Retrieved December 20, 2005.
Robinson, Walter V. (December 11, 2005). "Truth and Duty: a distorted lens". The Boston Globe. Retrieved March 13, 2008.
Latour, Francie; Rezendes, Michael (September 11, 2004). "Authenticity backed on Bush documents". The Boston Globe. Retrieved March 25, 2007.
"For the Record". The Boston Globe, September 15, 2004. September 15, 2004. Archived from the original on June 19, 2006. Retrieved March 25, 2007.

cbsnews.com (Global: 108^th place; English: 80^th place)

cbsnews.com

Also, Bill Flynn, "one of country's top authorities on document authentication.""Officer's Widow Questions Bush Guard Memos". ABC News. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 18, 2008. and document expert Sandra Ramsey Lines: "'I'm virtually certain these were computer generated,'" "Bush Guard Memos Questioned". CBS News. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 12, 2008. CBS News, September 10, 2004.
"New Questions On Bush Guard Duty". CBS News. September 8, 2004. Retrieved October 3, 2007.
"Dan Rather Statement On Memos". CBS News. September 20, 2005. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
"CBS Names Memo Probe Panel". CBS News. September 22, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"New Questions on Bush Guard Duty". CBS News. September 8, 2004. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
"Memorandum, May 4, 1972" (PDF). CBS News. Retrieved March 17, 2006.
"Memorandum for Record, August 1, 1972" (PDF). CBS News. Retrieved March 17, 2006.
"Memo to File, May 19, 1972" (PDF). CBS News. Retrieved March 17, 2006.
"Memo to File, August 18, 1973" (PDF). CBS News. Retrieved March 17, 2006.
"Bush Guard Memos Questioned". CBS News, Associated Press. September 10, 2004. Retrieved December 20, 2005.
CBS/AP (September 15, 2004). "GOP Slams CBS on Bush Memos". CBS News. Retrieved March 17, 2008.
"New Scrutiny Of Bush's Service". CBS News. September 9, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"CBS Stands By Bush-Guard Memos". CBS News. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
"Bush Guard Memos Questioned". CBS News. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 12, 2008.
"A Look Back At The Controversy". CBS News. January 11, 2005. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"CBS News affirms its intention to continue to report all aspects of the story" (PDF). CBS News. September 15, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"CBS Defends Bush Memos". CBS News. September 15, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"For The Record: Bush Documents". www.cbsnews.com. September 15, 2004. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
Jarrett Murphy (February 11, 2009). "CBS Statement On Bush Memos". CBS News. Retrieved July 27, 2011.
"CBS Statement On Bush Memos". CBS News. September 20, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"CBS News Statement On Panel". CBS News. September 22, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.

wwwimage.cbsnews.com

"Thornburgh-Boccardi report" (PDF). CBS News. Retrieved December 21, 2005.
"Transcript of CBS segment" (PDF). CBS News. Retrieved May 24, 2010.
"CBS Evening News Transcript" (PDF). CBS News. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"CBS Evening News Transcript" (PDF). CBS News. September 11, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"CBS Evening News Transcript" (PDF). CBS News. September 13, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"Thornburg-Boccardi Report, Appendix 4" (PDF). CBS News. Retrieved December 21, 2005.

image.cbsnews.com

Dick Thornburgh and Louis D. Boccardi, Report of the Independent Review Panel. CBS News: January 5, 2005.

chron.com (Global: 599^th place; English: 369^th place)

Crowe, Robert; Mason, Julie (September 15, 2004), "Ex-staffer: Bush records are fake; Secretary to military officer says she never typed the memos", Houston Chronicle, p. A7, archived from the original on September 15, 2004

cnn.com (Global: 28^th place; English: 26^th place)

edition.cnn.com

"CBS' experts say they didn't authenticate Bush memos". CNN. September 15, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2006.

cnn.com

"CNN Sept 21, 2004". CNN.

creativepro.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Including Peter Tytell, Thomas Phinney, and Joseph Newcomer, a man with 35 years of computer font technology experience. See: Last, Jonathan. "It's Worse Than You Thought". Archived from the original on January 12, 2005. Retrieved March 10, 2008. The Weekly Standard, January 11, 2005, and Cohen, Sandee. Making Headlines, Not Setting Them Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine, creativepro.com, September 23, 2004.

dallasnews.com (Global: 757^th place; English: 455^th place)

Slover, Pete (September 11, 2004). "Authenticity of memo to 'sugar coat' Bush record is further questioned". Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on September 12, 2005. Retrieved March 24, 2008. The Seattle Times also published this story as "More challenges about whether Bush documents are authentic". The archived DallasNews.com article requires JavaScript to be disabled to work; a permalinked version of the link with all scripts disabled is here.
Slover, Pete. "Ex-aide disavows Bush Guard memos". Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on September 18, 2004. The archived link works only with JavaScript disabled in the browser; a version with all scripts disabled is here.

foxnews.com (Global: 152^nd place; English: 120^th place)

Carl Cameron; et al. (September 22, 2004). "Kerry Aide Talked to Bush Guard Docs Figure". FoxNews.com. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
Rosen, James (September 10, 2004). "FOX Interviews Commander's Son". Fox News. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
"Final Figure in '60 Minutes' Scandal Resigns". Fox News. Associated Press. March 25, 2005. Retrieved March 20, 2006.

freerepublic.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

"Live Thread: Ben Barnes and CBS Attempt Another Bush Smear (60 Minutes)".

go.com (Global: 48^th place; English: 39^th place)

abcnews.go.com

Ross, Brian; Howard Rosenberg (September 14, 2004). "Document Analysts: CBS News Ignored Doubts". ABC News. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
Also, Bill Flynn, "one of country's top authorities on document authentication.""Officer's Widow Questions Bush Guard Memos". ABC News. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 18, 2008. and document expert Sandra Ramsey Lines: "'I'm virtually certain these were computer generated,'" "Bush Guard Memos Questioned". CBS News. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 12, 2008. CBS News, September 10, 2004.
"Officer's Widow Questions Bush Guard Documents". ABC News. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 19, 2008.
"The Note". ABC News. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2007.

harvard.edu (Global: 18^th place; English: 17^th place)

news.harvard.edu

Jenny Attiyeh (February 3, 2005). "Who's got the power?". The Harvard Gazette. Retrieved April 16, 2021. Assaulted by a string of disasters – with "Rathergate" as the most recent example – the conventional press is on the defensive

hollywoodreporter.com (Global: 15^th place; English: 16^th place)

"CBS Bans Ads for Dan Rather Movie 'Truth'". The Hollywood Reporter. October 16, 2015. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

huffingtonpost.com (Global: 109^th place; English: 87^th place)

Mapes, Mary (September 20, 2007). "Courage for Dan Rather". The Huffington Post. Retrieved January 22, 2008.

ibm.com (Global: 1,131^st place; English: 850^th place)

"IBM Archives: IBM Office Products Division highlights - page 2". www.ibm.com. January 23, 2003. Retrieved January 5, 2023.

latimes.com (Global: 22^nd place; English: 19^th place)

Wallsten, Peter (September 18, 2004). "GOP Activist Made Allegations on CBS Memos". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 11, 2015.
Wallsten, Peter (September 12, 2004). "No Disputing It: Blogs Are Major Players". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved January 5, 2023.

nationalreview.com (Global: 1,698^th place; English: 987^th place)

tks.nationalreview.com

Jim Geraghty (September 10, 2004). "About that Bush document". National Review Online. Retrieved March 18, 2008.

nbcnews.com (Global: 137^th place; English: 101^st place)

"CBS ousts 4 over Bush Guard story". Associated Press. January 10, 2005. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
"Rather files $70 million lawsuit against CBS Newsman alleges network made him 'scapegoat' for discredited story". Associated Press. September 20, 2007. Retrieved March 24, 2008.

newsobserver.com (Global: 2,370^th place; English: 1,294^th place)

"Transcript of WPTF interview with Dan Rather". The News & Observer. Retrieved November 9, 2006.

newyorker.com (Global: 146^th place; English: 110^th place)

Toobin, Jeffrey (June 2, 2008). "The Dirty Trickster". The New Yorker. Retrieved June 14, 2008.

nwsource.com (Global: 907^th place; English: 580^th place)

seattletimes.nwsource.com

Wallsten, Peter (September 18, 2004). "Buckhead, who said CBS memos were forged, is a GOP-linked attorney". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on August 9, 2007. Retrieved March 17, 2008.

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; English: 7^th place)

Ralph Blumenthal; Jim Rutenberg (September 12, 2004). "An Ex-Officer Now Believes Guard Memo Isn't Genuine". New York Times. Retrieved December 20, 2005. Registration required.
Seelye, Katharine Q.; Rutenberg, Jim (September 10, 2004). "Commander's Son Questions Memos on Bush's Service". The New York Times. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
Balleza, Maureen; Zernike, Kate (September 15, 2004). "Memos on Bush Are Fake but Accurate, Typist Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 5, 2015. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
Rutenberg, Jim; Prendergast, Mark J. (September 20, 2004). "CBS Asserts It Was Misled by Ex-Officer on Bush Documents". The New York Times. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
Carter, Bill (January 11, 2005). "Analysis: Post-Mortem of CBS's Flawed Broadcast". The New York Times. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
Zernike, Kate (September 25, 2004). "'60 Minutes' Delays Report Questioning Reasons for Iraq War". The New York Times. Retrieved September 20, 2007.

observer.com (Global: 760^th place; English: 494^th place)

Hagen, Joe (March 13, 2005). "Dan Rather's Long Goodbye: Who Done It?". The New York Observer. Archived from the original on October 29, 2007. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
Gilette, Felix (January 23, 2008). "CBS Agrees to Hand Over 'Rigler Report' to Rather's Legal Team". The New York Observer. Archived from the original on January 28, 2008. Retrieved March 24, 2008.

onlinejournal.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Burkett, Bill. "What do you say?". Archived from the original on June 9, 2008. Retrieved May 11, 2012. archived copy from archive.org of story originally from onlinejournal.com, March 19, 2003.
Bill Burkett (March 19, 2003). "What do you say?". Online Journal. Archived from the original on February 10, 2006. Retrieved March 20, 2006.

opinionjournal.com (Global: low place; English: 8,848^th place)

Taranto, James (September 15, 2004). "All the News that's Fake but Accurate". The Wall Street Journal Online. Retrieved March 15, 2008.

pbs.org (Global: 198^th place; English: 154^th place)

"Rathergate". Frontline (American TV program). Public Broadcasting Service. 2007. Retrieved April 16, 2021. Of course your most famous bump-up in recognition came during the 2004 election. Can you just lay out the story for us? [...] I called that post "The 61st Minute,"

recordonline.com (Global: 6,105^th place; English: 3,394^th place)

archive.recordonline.com

Brooks, Paul (February 22, 2005). "Hinchey sees hand of Rove". Times Herald-Record.

salon.com (Global: 456^th place; English: 300^th place)

dir.salon.com

Boehlert, Eric (September 10, 2004). "Swift Boat flacks attack CBS". Salon.com. Retrieved March 18, 2008.

seattletimes.com (Global: 519^th place; English: 316^th place)

Slover, Pete (September 11, 2004). "Authenticity of memo to 'sugar coat' Bush record is further questioned". Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on September 12, 2005. Retrieved March 24, 2008. The Seattle Times also published this story as "More challenges about whether Bush documents are authentic". The archived DallasNews.com article requires JavaScript to be disabled to work; a permalinked version of the link with all scripts disabled is here.

sfgate.com (Global: 166^th place; English: 121^st place)

Latour, Francie; Rezendes, Michael (September 11, 2004). "Further scrutiny lessens doubts on Bush memos / Some skeptics now say IBM typewriter could have been used". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved March 20, 2006.

time.com (Global: 61^st place; English: 54^th place)

See Ripley, Amanda (September 13, 2004). "The X Files Of Lt. Bush: A flurry of contested memos and memories sheds more heat than light on his record". Time Magazine. Archived from the original on January 4, 2013. Retrieved March 25, 2008. and Dobbs, Michael (September 12, 2004). "Gaps in Service Continue to Dog Bush". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
Grossman, Lev (December 19, 2004). "Blogs have their day". Time Magazine. Archived from the original on January 4, 2007. Retrieved March 18, 2008.

usatoday.com (Global: 41^st place; English: 34^th place)

Dave Moniz; Kevin Johnson; Jim Drinkard (September 21, 2004). "CBS backs off Guard story". USA Today. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
Memmot, Mark (September 21, 2004). "Scoops and skepticism: How the story unfolded". USA Today. Retrieved March 21, 2008.
Moniz, Dave; Drinkard, Jim; Kevin Johnson (September 21, 2004). "Texan has made allegations for years". USA Today. Retrieved March 13, 2008.
Johnson, Kevin; Moniz, Dave; Jim Drinkard (September 20, 2004). "CBS arranged for meeting with Lockhart". USA Today. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
Dave Moniz; Kevin Johnson; Jim Drinkard (September 21, 2004). "CBS backs off Guard story". USA Today. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
Moniz, Dave; Drinkard, Jim (September 9, 2004). "Guard commander's memos criticize Bush". USA Today. Retrieved March 17, 2008.
"Bush documents obtained by USA TODAY" (PDF). USA Today. Retrieved March 17, 2006.
Dave Moniz; Kevin Johnson; Jim Drinkard (September 21, 2004). "CBS backs off Guard story". USA TODAY. Retrieved December 20, 2005.
"Authenticity of new Bush military papers questioned". USA Today. Associated Press. September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 19, 2008.
Kasindorf, Martin; Benedetto, Richard (September 21, 2004). "Parties lob accusations over suspect papers". USA Today. Retrieved December 21, 2005.

washingtonmonthly.com (Global: 6,093^rd place; English: 3,721^st place)

Kevin Drum (September 10, 2004). "Killian Memo Update". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on March 15, 2006. Retrieved January 17, 2017.

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34^th place; English: 27^th place)

Two entitled "Memo to File," one "Memorandum," and one "Memorandum for Record," see here [1] for PDF versions at the Washington Post website.
Dobbs, Michael; Howard Kurtz (September 14, 2004). "Expert Cited by CBS Says He Didn't Authenticate Papers". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
See Ripley, Amanda (September 13, 2004). "The X Files Of Lt. Bush: A flurry of contested memos and memories sheds more heat than light on his record". Time Magazine. Archived from the original on January 4, 2013. Retrieved March 25, 2008. and Dobbs, Michael (September 12, 2004). "Gaps in Service Continue to Dog Bush". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
Michael Dobbs; Mike Allen (September 9, 2004). "Some Question Authenticity of Papers on Bush". Washington Post. Retrieved December 20, 2004.
Howard Kurtz; Michael Dobbs; James V. Grimaldi (September 19, 2004). "In Rush to Air, CBS Quashed Memo Worries". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 17, 2008.
Howard Kurtz (September 20, 2004). "After Blogs Got Hits, CBS Got a Black Eye". Washington Post.
Michael Dobbs; Mike Allen (September 10, 2004). "Some Question Authenticity of Papers on Bush". The Washington Post. p. A01. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
Kurtz, Howard (September 11, 2004). "Rather Defends CBS Over Memos on Bush". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
Kurtz, Howard (September 16, 2004). "Rather Concedes Papers Are Suspect; CBS Anchor Urges Media to Focus On Bush Service". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
Dobbs, Michael (September 15, 2004). "CBS Guard Documents Traced to Tex. Kinko's". The Washington Post. p. A06. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
"The Whacking of CBS (washingtonpost.com)". www.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
Mapes, Mary (November 11, 2005). ""Final Days at "60 Minutes"". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
"Document Experts Say CBS Ignored Memo 'Red Flags' (washingtonpost.com)". www.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
"Critics Question No-Bias Finding By CBS Panel (washingtonpost.com)". www.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved January 5, 2023.

washingtontimes.com (Global: 1,029^th place; English: 657^th place)

Stephen Dinan; Bill Sammon (September 22, 2004). "Kerry camp rejects CBS link". The Washington Times. p. A01. Retrieved March 20, 2006.

washtimes.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

"Rove rejects charges he was CBS source". The Washington Times. September 22, 2004. Retrieved December 21, 2005.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

Dobbs, Michael; Howard Kurtz (September 14, 2004). "Expert Cited by CBS Says He Didn't Authenticate Papers". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
Including Peter Tytell, Thomas Phinney, and Joseph Newcomer, a man with 35 years of computer font technology experience. See: Last, Jonathan. "It's Worse Than You Thought". Archived from the original on January 12, 2005. Retrieved March 10, 2008. The Weekly Standard, January 11, 2005, and Cohen, Sandee. Making Headlines, Not Setting Them Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine, creativepro.com, September 23, 2004.
Burkett, Bill. "What do you say?". Archived from the original on June 9, 2008. Retrieved May 11, 2012. archived copy from archive.org of story originally from onlinejournal.com, March 19, 2003.
Bill Burkett (March 19, 2003). "What do you say?". Online Journal. Archived from the original on February 10, 2006. Retrieved March 20, 2006.
Baxter, Tom (September 19, 2004). "Atlantan challenged CBS documents first". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on September 3, 2005.
Wallsten, Peter (September 18, 2004). "Buckhead, who said CBS memos were forged, is a GOP-linked attorney". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on August 9, 2007. Retrieved March 17, 2008.
Grossman, Lev (December 19, 2004). "Blogs have their day". Time Magazine. Archived from the original on January 4, 2007. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
Hayes, Stephen F. (September 9, 2004). "Is it a hoax?". The Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
Slover, Pete (September 11, 2004). "Authenticity of memo to 'sugar coat' Bush record is further questioned". Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on September 12, 2005. Retrieved March 24, 2008. The Seattle Times also published this story as "More challenges about whether Bush documents are authentic". The archived DallasNews.com article requires JavaScript to be disabled to work; a permalinked version of the link with all scripts disabled is here.
Last, Jonathan (September 27, 2004). "What Blogs Have Wrought". The Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on September 23, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2008.
"Your WordPress! Site hosted with CloudAccess.net – Just another WordPress site". Archived from the original on May 21, 2021. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
"For the Record". The Boston Globe, September 15, 2004. September 15, 2004. Archived from the original on June 19, 2006. Retrieved March 25, 2007.
Kevin Drum (September 10, 2004). "Killian Memo Update". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on March 15, 2006. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
Emery, Noemie (September 21, 2004). "Dear Mr. Rather". The Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on September 23, 2004. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
Crowe, Robert; Mason, Julie (September 15, 2004), "Ex-staffer: Bush records are fake; Secretary to military officer says she never typed the memos", Houston Chronicle, p. A7, archived from the original on September 15, 2004
Balleza, Maureen; Zernike, Kate (September 15, 2004). "Memos on Bush Are Fake but Accurate, Typist Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 5, 2015. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
Slover, Pete. "Ex-aide disavows Bush Guard memos". Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on September 18, 2004. The archived link works only with JavaScript disabled in the browser; a version with all scripts disabled is here.
"The fake but accurate media". The Weekly Standard. September 27, 2004. Archived from the original on September 22, 2004. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
Jonathan V. Last, "Whitewash", The Weekly Standard, January 10, 2005.
Hagen, Joe (March 13, 2005). "Dan Rather's Long Goodbye: Who Done It?". The New York Observer. Archived from the original on October 29, 2007. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
Gilette, Felix (January 23, 2008). "CBS Agrees to Hand Over 'Rigler Report' to Rather's Legal Team". The New York Observer. Archived from the original on January 28, 2008. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
"Appeals court dismisses Dan Rather's suit vs. CBS". Archived from the original on October 2, 2009.

weeklystandard.com (Global: 5,987^th place; English: 3,757^th place)

Including Peter Tytell, Thomas Phinney, and Joseph Newcomer, a man with 35 years of computer font technology experience. See: Last, Jonathan. "It's Worse Than You Thought". Archived from the original on January 12, 2005. Retrieved March 10, 2008. The Weekly Standard, January 11, 2005, and Cohen, Sandee. Making Headlines, Not Setting Them Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine, creativepro.com, September 23, 2004.
Hayes, Stephen F. (September 9, 2004). "Is it a hoax?". The Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on September 10, 2004. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
Last, Jonathan (September 27, 2004). "What Blogs Have Wrought". The Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on September 23, 2004. Retrieved March 20, 2008.
Emery, Noemie (September 21, 2004). "Dear Mr. Rather". The Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on September 23, 2004. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
"The fake but accurate media". The Weekly Standard. September 27, 2004. Archived from the original on September 22, 2004. Retrieved March 24, 2008.

wistv.com (Global: low place; English: 9,543^rd place)

Baker, Mike (November 7, 2006). "Rather defends discredited 60 Minutes segment in radio interview". Associated Press. Retrieved November 10, 2006.

yahoo.com (Global: 38^th place; English: 40^th place)

news.yahoo.com

"Appeals court dismisses Dan Rather's suit vs. CBS". Archived from the original on October 2, 2009.

Killian documents controversy (English Wikipedia)

aim.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

ajc.com (Global: 685th place; English: 404th place)

aolcdn.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

archive.today (Global: 14th place; English: 14th place)

archives.gov (Global: 446th place; English: 308th place)

georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov

baltimoresun.com (Global: 453rd place; English: 267th place)

boston.com (Global: 310th place; English: 208th place)

cbsnews.com (Global: 108th place; English: 80th place)

cbsnews.com

wwwimage.cbsnews.com

image.cbsnews.com

chron.com (Global: 599th place; English: 369th place)

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; English: 26th place)

edition.cnn.com

cnn.com

creativepro.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

dallasnews.com (Global: 757th place; English: 455th place)

foxnews.com (Global: 152nd place; English: 120th place)

freerepublic.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

go.com (Global: 48th place; English: 39th place)

abcnews.go.com

harvard.edu (Global: 18th place; English: 17th place)

news.harvard.edu

hollywoodreporter.com (Global: 15th place; English: 16th place)

huffingtonpost.com (Global: 109th place; English: 87th place)

ibm.com (Global: 1,131st place; English: 850th place)

latimes.com (Global: 22nd place; English: 19th place)

nationalreview.com (Global: 1,698th place; English: 987th place)

tks.nationalreview.com

nbcnews.com (Global: 137th place; English: 101st place)

newsobserver.com (Global: 2,370th place; English: 1,294th place)

newyorker.com (Global: 146th place; English: 110th place)

nwsource.com (Global: 907th place; English: 580th place)

seattletimes.nwsource.com

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

observer.com (Global: 760th place; English: 494th place)

onlinejournal.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

opinionjournal.com (Global: low place; English: 8,848th place)

pbs.org (Global: 198th place; English: 154th place)

recordonline.com (Global: 6,105th place; English: 3,394th place)

archive.recordonline.com

salon.com (Global: 456th place; English: 300th place)

dir.salon.com

seattletimes.com (Global: 519th place; English: 316th place)

sfgate.com (Global: 166th place; English: 121st place)

time.com (Global: 61st place; English: 54th place)

usatoday.com (Global: 41st place; English: 34th place)

washingtonmonthly.com (Global: 6,093rd place; English: 3,721st place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34th place; English: 27th place)

washingtontimes.com (Global: 1,029th place; English: 657th place)

washtimes.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

weeklystandard.com (Global: 5,987th place; English: 3,757th place)

wistv.com (Global: low place; English: 9,543rd place)

yahoo.com (Global: 38th place; English: 40th place)

news.yahoo.com

ajc.com (Global: 685^th place; English: 404^th place)

archive.today (Global: 14^th place; English: 14^th place)

archives.gov (Global: 446^th place; English: 308^th place)

baltimoresun.com (Global: 453^rd place; English: 267^th place)

boston.com (Global: 310^th place; English: 208^th place)

cbsnews.com (Global: 108^th place; English: 80^th place)

chron.com (Global: 599^th place; English: 369^th place)

cnn.com (Global: 28^th place; English: 26^th place)

dallasnews.com (Global: 757^th place; English: 455^th place)

foxnews.com (Global: 152^nd place; English: 120^th place)

go.com (Global: 48^th place; English: 39^th place)

harvard.edu (Global: 18^th place; English: 17^th place)

hollywoodreporter.com (Global: 15^th place; English: 16^th place)

huffingtonpost.com (Global: 109^th place; English: 87^th place)

ibm.com (Global: 1,131^st place; English: 850^th place)

latimes.com (Global: 22^nd place; English: 19^th place)

nationalreview.com (Global: 1,698^th place; English: 987^th place)

nbcnews.com (Global: 137^th place; English: 101^st place)

newsobserver.com (Global: 2,370^th place; English: 1,294^th place)

newyorker.com (Global: 146^th place; English: 110^th place)

nwsource.com (Global: 907^th place; English: 580^th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; English: 7^th place)

observer.com (Global: 760^th place; English: 494^th place)

opinionjournal.com (Global: low place; English: 8,848^th place)

pbs.org (Global: 198^th place; English: 154^th place)

recordonline.com (Global: 6,105^th place; English: 3,394^th place)

salon.com (Global: 456^th place; English: 300^th place)

seattletimes.com (Global: 519^th place; English: 316^th place)

sfgate.com (Global: 166^th place; English: 121^st place)

time.com (Global: 61^st place; English: 54^th place)

usatoday.com (Global: 41^st place; English: 34^th place)

washingtonmonthly.com (Global: 6,093^rd place; English: 3,721^st place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34^th place; English: 27^th place)

washingtontimes.com (Global: 1,029^th place; English: 657^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

weeklystandard.com (Global: 5,987^th place; English: 3,757^th place)

wistv.com (Global: low place; English: 9,543^rd place)

yahoo.com (Global: 38^th place; English: 40^th place)