New trial (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "New trial" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

696^th place

428^th place

332^nd place

246^th place

8,028^th place

4,755^th place

2^nd place

2^nd place

26^th place

20^th place

1semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

2,540^th place

1,620^th place

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

"Retrial". Wex. Cornell Law School. Retrieved 16 October 2021.

doi.org

Findlater, Janet E. (1980). "Retrial After a Hung Jury: The Double Jeopardy Problem". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 129 (3): 701–737. doi:10.2307/3311743. JSTOR 3311743. S2CID 154125185.

jstor.org

Findlater, Janet E. (1980). "Retrial After a Hung Jury: The Double Jeopardy Problem". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 129 (3): 701–737. doi:10.2307/3311743. JSTOR 3311743. S2CID 154125185.

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121 (1959).
Heath v. Alabama, 474 U.S. 82 (1985).

justice.gc.ca

laws-lois.justice.gc.ca

Criminal Code (Canada), (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), s. 686(4).

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Findlater, Janet E. (1980). "Retrial After a Hung Jury: The Double Jeopardy Problem". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 129 (3): 701–737. doi:10.2307/3311743. JSTOR 3311743. S2CID 154125185.

wayne.edu

digitalcommons.wayne.edu

Findlater, Janet E. (1980). "Retrial After a Hung Jury: The Double Jeopardy Problem". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 129 (3): 701–737. doi:10.2307/3311743. JSTOR 3311743. S2CID 154125185.