Separation of powers (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Separation of powers" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

9worldcat.org

5^th place

8doi.org

2^nd place

4books.google.com

3^rd place

4cambridge.org

305^th place

264^th place

3jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

3uchicago.edu

230^th place

214^th place

2bc.edu

4,784^th place

3,078^th place

2ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

2yale.edu

565^th place

460^th place

1wikisource.org

27^th place

51^st place

1rschindler.com

low place

1mlloyd.org

low place

1upenn.edu

702^nd place

520^th place

1hcourt.gov.au

low place

bc.edu

bclawreview.bc.edu

Waldron 2013, pp. 457–458. Waldron, Jeremy (28 March 2013). "Separation of Powers in Thought and Practice?". Boston College Law Review. 54 (2): 433–468.
Waldron 2013, pp. 459–460. Waldron, Jeremy (28 March 2013). "Separation of Powers in Thought and Practice?". Boston College Law Review. 54 (2): 433–468.

books.google.com

Tuckness, Alex (2002). "Institutional Roles, Legislative View". Locke and the Legislative Point of View: Toleration, Contested Principles, and the Law. Princeton University Press. p. 133. ISBN 0691095043.
Locke, John (1824). Two Treatises of Government. C. and J. Rivington. p. 215.
Kant, Immanuel (1971). "Perpetual Peace". In Reiss, Hans (ed.). Political Writings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 112–13. ISBN 9781107268364.
Wood, Gordon S. (2018). "Comment". In Scalia, Antonin (ed.). A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 49–64. doi:10.2307/j.ctvbj7jxv.6. Retrieved 12 December 2020.

cambridge.org

Möllers 2019, p. 239: "The modern theory of separated powers [...] addresses the necessary or possible relations between [institutional] actors and their normative ‘functions’. Legislation, execution of laws and adjudication are ‘functions’ that the states or other public authorities fulfil and that are carried out by respective ‘branches’. In this context, the notion of ‘function’ refers to different types of legally relevant actions." Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.
On this distinction, see Möllers 2019, p. 231. Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.
Möllers 2019, p. 234. Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.
Möllers 2019, p. 240. Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.

doi.org

Vile, Maurice J. C. (April 2008). "The separation of powers". In Greene, Jack P.; Pole, J. R. (eds.). A companion to the American Revolution. Wiley (Blackwell imprint). pp. 686–690. doi:10.1002/9780470756454.ch87. ISBN 978-0-470-75644-7.
Kurland 1986, p. 595. Kurland, Philip B. (December 1986). "The Rise and Fall of the 'Doctrine' of Separation of Powers". Michigan Law Review. 85 (3): 592–613. doi:10.2307/1288758. JSTOR 1288758.
For the case of the United States constitution: Kurland 1986, p. 593 Kurland, Philip B. (December 1986). "The Rise and Fall of the 'Doctrine' of Separation of Powers". Michigan Law Review. 85 (3): 592–613. doi:10.2307/1288758. JSTOR 1288758.
Wood, Gordon S. (2018). "Comment". In Scalia, Antonin (ed.). A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 49–64. doi:10.2307/j.ctvbj7jxv.6. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
Möllers 2019, p. 239: "The modern theory of separated powers [...] addresses the necessary or possible relations between [institutional] actors and their normative ‘functions’. Legislation, execution of laws and adjudication are ‘functions’ that the states or other public authorities fulfil and that are carried out by respective ‘branches’. In this context, the notion of ‘function’ refers to different types of legally relevant actions." Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.
On this distinction, see Möllers 2019, p. 231. Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.
Möllers 2019, p. 234. Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.
Möllers 2019, p. 240. Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.

hcourt.gov.au

The Strengths of the Weakest Arm. Australian Bar Association Conference. Florence, Italy. 2 July 2004. Archived from the original on 22 August 2023. Retrieved 22 August 2023.

jstor.org

Kurland 1986, p. 595. Kurland, Philip B. (December 1986). "The Rise and Fall of the 'Doctrine' of Separation of Powers". Michigan Law Review. 85 (3): 592–613. doi:10.2307/1288758. JSTOR 1288758.
For the case of the United States constitution: Kurland 1986, p. 593 Kurland, Philip B. (December 1986). "The Rise and Fall of the 'Doctrine' of Separation of Powers". Michigan Law Review. 85 (3): 592–613. doi:10.2307/1288758. JSTOR 1288758.
Magill 2000, pp. 1170–72. Magill, M. Elizabeth (2000). "The Real Separation in Separation of Powers Law". Virginia Law Review. 86 (6): 1127–1198. JSTOR 1073943. SSRN 224797.

mlloyd.org

Lloyd, Marshall Davies (22 September 1998), Polybius and the Founding Fathers: the separation of powers, retrieved 17 November 2012

rschindler.com

Schindler, Ronald, Montesquieu's Political Writings, archived from the original on 12 October 2013, retrieved 19 November 2012

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

Price, Sara (22 February 2011), The Roman Republic in Montesquieu and Rousseau – Abstract, SSRN 1766947
Magill 2000, pp. 1170–72. Magill, M. Elizabeth (2000). "The Real Separation in Separation of Powers Law". Virginia Law Review. 86 (6): 1127–1198. JSTOR 1073943. SSRN 224797.

uchicago.edu

chicagounbound.uchicago.edu

Kurland 1986, p. 595. Kurland, Philip B. (December 1986). "The Rise and Fall of the 'Doctrine' of Separation of Powers". Michigan Law Review. 85 (3): 592–613. doi:10.2307/1288758. JSTOR 1288758.
For the case of the United States constitution: Kurland 1986, p. 593 Kurland, Philip B. (December 1986). "The Rise and Fall of the 'Doctrine' of Separation of Powers". Michigan Law Review. 85 (3): 592–613. doi:10.2307/1288758. JSTOR 1288758.

press-pubs.uchicago.edu

Paine, Thomas (1776). "Republican Government: On the Origin and Design of Government in General, With Concise Remarks on the English Constitution". Common Sense.

upenn.edu

scholarship.law.upenn.edu

Magill 2000, pp. 1170–72. Magill, M. Elizabeth (2000). "The Real Separation in Separation of Powers Law". Virginia Law Review. 86 (6): 1127–1198. JSTOR 1073943. SSRN 224797.

web.archive.org

Schindler, Ronald, Montesquieu's Political Writings, archived from the original on 12 October 2013, retrieved 19 November 2012
The Strengths of the Weakest Arm. Australian Bar Association Conference. Florence, Italy. 2 July 2004. Archived from the original on 22 August 2023. Retrieved 22 August 2023.

wikisource.org

fr.wikisource.org

"Esprit des lois (1777)/L11/C6 - Wikisource". fr.wikisource.org (in French). Retrieved 11 March 2018.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Vile 1967, p. 18. Vile, Maurice J. C. (1967). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. OCLC 390050.
Vile 1967, pp. 2–3. Vile, Maurice J. C. (1967). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. OCLC 390050.
Vile 1967, pp. 33–34. Vile, Maurice J. C. (1967). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. OCLC 390050.
Vile 1967, pp. 120–121. Vile, Maurice J. C. (1967). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. OCLC 390050.
Vile 1967, pp. 71–72. Vile, Maurice J. C. (1967). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. OCLC 390050.
Möllers 2019, p. 239: "The modern theory of separated powers [...] addresses the necessary or possible relations between [institutional] actors and their normative ‘functions’. Legislation, execution of laws and adjudication are ‘functions’ that the states or other public authorities fulfil and that are carried out by respective ‘branches’. In this context, the notion of ‘function’ refers to different types of legally relevant actions." Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.
On this distinction, see Möllers 2019, p. 231. Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.
Möllers 2019, p. 234. Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.
Möllers 2019, p. 240. Möllers, Christoph (September 2019). "Separation of Powers (ch. 9)". In Masterman, Roger; Schütze, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge Companions to Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 230‒257. doi:10.1017/9781316716731. ISBN 978-1-107-16781-0. OCLC 1099539425.

yale.edu

avalon.law.yale.edu

"The Federalist No 48". Avalon Project. Yale University. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
James, Madison. "Federalist No. 51". The Avalon Project. Yale University. Retrieved 24 March 2018.