Statute of limitations (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Statute of limitations" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
low place
5,865th place
421st place
263rd place
332nd place
246th place
5,077th place
low place
918th place
556th place
3,556th place
2,043rd place
730th place
468th place
1,478th place
868th place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
low place
6,663rd place
2,917th place
1,621st place
1,697th place
1,040th place
7,147th place
3,830th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
772nd place
849th place
2,365th place
1,348th place
low place
low place
low place
9,741st place
965th place
579th place
low place
low place
2,540th place
1,620th place
1,028th place
740th place
768th place
482nd place
low place
low place
2,025th place
1,150th place
low place
low place
3,596th place
2,126th place
1,249th place
4,347th place
low place
7,503rd place
5,983rd place
3,696th place
7,172nd place
8,812th place
8,026th place
5,039th place
362nd place
245th place
low place
low place
70th place
63rd place
low place
low place
2nd place
2nd place
2,474th place
1,469th place
649th place
827th place
8,598th place
4,874th place
505th place
410th place
low place
low place
3,322nd place
1,897th place
886th place
517th place
2,302nd place
1,389th place
152nd place
120th place
3,566th place
1,985th place
5,884th place
3,220th place
low place
low place
881st place
611th place
8,528th place
5,942nd place
low place
low place

aph.gov.au

books.google.com

ca.gov

courts.ca.gov

  • "Statute of Limitations". California Court Judicial Branch. Public Access Records. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
  • Special Historic Session. "Opening Remarks:HistoricSpecial section" (PDF). www.courts.ca.gov. Supreme Court Of California. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
  • California Courts, Judicial Council. "Public Access Records". California Courts. Rewriting Amendments. Retrieved 6 June 2014.

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

case.law

cite.case.law

coe.int

venice.coe.int

congress.gov

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

ct.gov

cga.ct.gov

ctpost.com

ctvnews.ca

montreal.ctvnews.ca

dagsavisen.no

diritto-penale.it

doi.org

fas.org

fbi.gov

federalregister.gov

ecfr.federalregister.gov

  • See, e.g., 8 C.F.R. 1003.2 ("(a) General. The Board may at any time reopen or reconsider a case in which it has rendered a decision on its own motion solely in order to correct a ministerial mistake or typographical error in that decision or to reissue the decision to correct a defect in service.... The time and numerical limitations set forth in paragraph (c)(2) of this section shall not apply to a motion to reopen proceedings:...
    (v) For which a three-member panel of the Board agrees that reopening is warranted when the following circumstances are present, provided that a respondent may file only one motion to reopen pursuant to this paragraph (c)(3): (A) A material change in fact or law underlying a removability ground or grounds specified in section 212 or 237 of the Act that occurred after the entry of an administratively final order that vitiates all grounds of removability applicable to the alien; and (B) The movant exercised diligence in pursuing the motion to reopen;
    (vi) Filed based on specific allegations, supported by evidence, that the respondent is a United States citizen or national....") (emphasis added)

fenninsurance.com

findlaw.com

statelaws.findlaw.com

foreignpolicyjournal.com

foxnews.com

gesetze-im-internet.de

gonzagalawreview.org

gov.on.ca

e-laws.gov.on.ca

heinonline.org

justice.gc.ca

laws-lois.justice.gc.ca

justice.gov

  • "650. Length of Limitations Period". www.justice.gov. 19 February 2015. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  • "Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law". U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). 31 May 2021. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials.

latrobe.edu.au

lib.latrobe.edu.au

  • "Parliament of Victoria". Inquiry Into The Handling of Child Abuse by Religious and Other Organizations. Retrieved 9 May 2013.

lawinfo.com

resources.lawinfo.com

legeaz.net

legislation.govt.nz

legislation.vic.gov.au

legislation.wa.gov.au

lequotidien.com

loc.gov

mi.gov

legislature.mi.gov

  • "MCL 600.5839". Michigan Legislature. State of Michigan. Retrieved 4 May 2017.

montrealgazette.com

northwestern.edu

scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu

oregonlive.com

oxfordlawtrove.com

oyez.org

parliament.vic.gov.au

scholar.google.com

scmp.com

scotusblog.com

sdap.org

sdvlaw.com

setkab.go.id

jdih.setkab.go.id

state.fl.us

leg.state.fl.us

theaustralian.com.au

thecanadianencyclopedia.ca

thomsonreuters.com

signon.thomsonreuters.com

up.nic.in

comtax.up.nic.in

uslegal.com

definitions.uslegal.com

utah.gov

le.utah.gov

web.archive.org

westlaw.com

content.next.westlaw.com

wiktionary.org

en.wiktionary.org

  • See, e.g., 8 C.F.R. 1003.2 ("(a) General. The Board may at any time reopen or reconsider a case in which it has rendered a decision on its own motion solely in order to correct a ministerial mistake or typographical error in that decision or to reissue the decision to correct a defect in service.... The time and numerical limitations set forth in paragraph (c)(2) of this section shall not apply to a motion to reopen proceedings:...
    (v) For which a three-member panel of the Board agrees that reopening is warranted when the following circumstances are present, provided that a respondent may file only one motion to reopen pursuant to this paragraph (c)(3): (A) A material change in fact or law underlying a removability ground or grounds specified in section 212 or 237 of the Act that occurred after the entry of an administratively final order that vitiates all grounds of removability applicable to the alien; and (B) The movant exercised diligence in pursuing the motion to reopen;
    (vi) Filed based on specific allegations, supported by evidence, that the respondent is a United States citizen or national....") (emphasis added)