Stephen Toulmin (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Stephen Toulmin" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

5doi.org

2^nd place

4web.archive.org

1^st place

2books.google.com

3^rd place

2semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

2neh.gov

7,544^th place

4,422^nd place

2worldcat.org

5^th place

2nytimes.com

7^th place

1usc.edu

1,077^th place

761^st place

1parlament.gv.at

2,705^th place

4,534^th place

1cn.edu

low place

1philarchive.org

low place

1csicop.org

3,411^th place

2,303^rd place

books.google.com

Loui, Ronald P. (2006). "A Citation-Based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument". In Hitchcock, David; Verheij, Bart (eds.). Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Springer Netherlands. pp. 31–38. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_3. ISBN 978-1-4020-4937-8. Retrieved 25 June 2010. Toulmin's 1958 work is essential in the field of argumentation
Book description of Decision by Debate at Google Books: "The most lasting legacy of the work is its break with formal, deductive logic and its introduction of Stephen Toulmin's model of argument to undergraduate student debaters, which, since then, has become a mainstay of what many have called the Renaissance of argumentation studies. Without the work presented in Decision by Debate, contemporary interdisciplinary views of argumentation that now dominate many disciplines might have never have taken place or at least have been severely delayed."

cn.edu

web.cn.edu

Wheeler, Kip (19 October 2010). "Toulmin Model of Argument" (PDF). cn.edu. Retrieved 12 October 2018.

csicop.org

"The Pantheon of Skeptics". CSI. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 31 January 2017. Retrieved 30 April 2017.

doi.org

Loui, Ronald P. (2006). "A Citation-Based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument". In Hitchcock, David; Verheij, Bart (eds.). Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Springer Netherlands. pp. 31–38. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_3. ISBN 978-1-4020-4937-8. Retrieved 25 June 2010. Toulmin's 1958 work is essential in the field of argumentation
Westfall, Richard. "Review: Toulmin and Human Understanding". The Journal of Modern History. 47 (4): 691–8. doi:10.1086/241374. S2CID 147375119.
Eruduran, Sibel; Aleixandre, Marilar, eds. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Science & Technology Education Library. Vol. 35. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 15–16. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2. ISBN 9781402066696. OCLC 171556540.
Spriggs, John (2012). GSN—The Goal Structuring Notation: A Structured Approach to Presenting Arguments. London; New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2312-5. ISBN 9781447123118. OCLC 792775478.
Reed, Chris; Walton, Douglas N.; Macagno, Fabrizio (March 2007). "Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence". The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22 (1): 87–109. doi:10.1017/S0269888907001051. S2CID 26294789.

neh.gov

Jefferson Lecturers Archived 20 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine at NEH Website (retrieved 22 January 2009).
"The Jefferson Lecture" Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, report on 1997 lecture, at NEH website.

nytimes.com

query.nytimes.com

"California Scholar Wins Government Honor", The New York Times, 12 February 1997.

nytimes.com

Grimes, William (11 December 2009). "Stephen Toulmin, a Philosopher and Educator, Dies at 87". The New York Times.

parlament.gv.at

"Reply to a parliamentary question" (PDF) (in German). p. 1761. Retrieved 24 November 2012.

philarchive.org

Reed, Chris; Walton, Douglas N.; Macagno, Fabrizio (March 2007). "Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence". The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22 (1): 87–109. doi:10.1017/S0269888907001051. S2CID 26294789.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Westfall, Richard. "Review: Toulmin and Human Understanding". The Journal of Modern History. 47 (4): 691–8. doi:10.1086/241374. S2CID 147375119.
Reed, Chris; Walton, Douglas N.; Macagno, Fabrizio (March 2007). "Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence". The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22 (1): 87–109. doi:10.1017/S0269888907001051. S2CID 26294789.

usc.edu

Stephen Toulmin, "A Dissenter's Life" Archived 27 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine (text of Toulmin's Jefferson Lecture) at USC website.

web.archive.org

Jefferson Lecturers Archived 20 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine at NEH Website (retrieved 22 January 2009).
Stephen Toulmin, "A Dissenter's Life" Archived 27 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine (text of Toulmin's Jefferson Lecture) at USC website.
"The Jefferson Lecture" Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, report on 1997 lecture, at NEH website.
"The Pantheon of Skeptics". CSI. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 31 January 2017. Retrieved 30 April 2017.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Eruduran, Sibel; Aleixandre, Marilar, eds. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Science & Technology Education Library. Vol. 35. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 15–16. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2. ISBN 9781402066696. OCLC 171556540.
Spriggs, John (2012). GSN—The Goal Structuring Notation: A Structured Approach to Presenting Arguments. London; New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2312-5. ISBN 9781447123118. OCLC 792775478.