Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1,518th place
1,072nd place
1st place
1st place
8,540th place
6,274th place
5,701st place
4,384th place
4,347th place
3,017th place
3,341st place
2,191st place
207th place
136th place
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
low place
low place

doi.org

groups.google.com

  • A. S. Tanenbaum (January 29, 1992). "LINUX is obsolete". Newsgroupcomp.os.minix. Usenet: 12595@star.cs.vu.nl. Retrieved November 27, 2006.
  • L. Torvalds (January 29, 1992). "Re: LINUX is obsolete". Newsgroupcomp.os.minix. Usenet: 1992Jan29.231426.20469@klaava.Helsinki.FI. Retrieved November 28, 2006.
  • A. S. Tanenbaum (January 30, 1992). "LINUX is obsolete". Newsgroupcomp.os.minix. Usenet: 12615@star.cs.vu.nl. Retrieved January 10, 2006.
  • Kevin Brown (January 31, 1992). "RE: LINUX is obsolete". Newsgroupcomp.os.minix. Usenet: 1992Jan31.074347.1198@menudo.uh.edu. Retrieved April 7, 2007.
  • L. Torvalds (January 30, 1992). "Apologies (was Re: LINUX is obsolete)". Newsgroupcomp.os.minix. Usenet: 1992Jan30.153816.1901@klaava.Helsinki.FI. Retrieved January 10, 2007.
  • Theodore Y. Ts'o (January 31, 1992). "Re: LINUX is obsolete". Newsgroupcomp.os.minix. Usenet: TYTSO.92Jan31164013@SOS.mit.edu. Retrieved May 11, 2007.
  • L. Torvalds (January 29, 1992). "Re: LINUX is obsolete". Newsgroupcomp.os.minix. Usenet: 1992Jan29.231426.20469@klaava.Helsinki.FI. Retrieved May 11, 2006.

oreilly.com

  • DiBona, Chris; Ockman, Sam; Stone, Mark; Behlendorf, Brian; Bradner, Scott; Hamerly, Jim; McKusick, Kirk; O'Reilly, Tim; Paquin, Tom; Perens, Bruce; S. Raymond, Eric; Stallman, Richard; Tiemann, Michael; Torvalds, Linus; Vixie, Paul; Wall, Larry; Young, Bob (January 1999). "The Tanenbaum-Torvalds Debate". Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. O'Reilly Media. ISBN 978-1-56592-582-3. When Linus himself heard that we were including this, he wanted to make sure that the world understood that he holds no animus towards Tanenbaum and in fact would not have sanctioned its inclusion if we had not been able to convince him that it would show the way the world was thinking about OS design at the time.

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

realworldtech.com

sbg.ac.at

cosy.sbg.ac.at

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

slashdot.org

developers.slashdot.org

linux.slashdot.org

umass.edu

lass.cs.umass.edu

vu.nl

cs.vu.nl

web.archive.org