Technological unemployment (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Technological unemployment" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
1st place
1st place
5th place
5th place
7th place
7th place
210th place
157th place
207th place
136th place
613th place
456th place
12th place
11th place
1,634th place
1,093rd place
703rd place
501st place
228th place
158th place
140th place
115th place
1,943rd place
1,253rd place
254th place
236th place
2,969th place
1,994th place
28th place
26th place
121st place
142nd place
102nd place
76th place
6th place
6th place
26th place
20th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
187th place
146th place
456th place
300th place
1,303rd place
808th place
6,781st place
4,660th place
low place
9,414th place
1,601st place
1,117th place
low place
low place
109th place
87th place
4,270th place
2,990th place
4th place
4th place
175th place
137th place
1,115th place
741st place
803rd place
826th place
198th place
154th place
low place
low place
193rd place
152nd place
231st place
332nd place
55th place
36th place
low place
low place
27th place
51st place
70th place
63rd place
476th place
282nd place
low place
low place
3,817th place
2,720th place
low place
low place
79th place
65th place
low place
low place
1,771st place
1,426th place
5,372nd place
3,593rd place
4,514th place
3,901st place
low place
9,033rd place
2,149th place
1,198th place
114th place
90th place
3,286th place
2,369th place
low place
low place
1,962nd place
2,558th place
low place
8,786th place
115th place
82nd place
1,110th place
695th place
220th place
155th place
low place
low place
615th place
407th place
1,060th place
700th place
low place
9,989th place
low place
7,041st place
low place
low place
6,201st place
5,692nd place
low place
low place
120th place
125th place
484th place
323rd place
551st place
406th place
low place
low place
2,435th place
1,699th place
7,951st place
4,722nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,117th place
1,361st place
433rd place
284th place
1,940th place
low place
low place
low place
9th place
13th place
2,839th place
1,792nd place
low place
7,965th place
low place
low place
5,214th place
3,062nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,577th place
2,212th place

PeoplesCapitalism.org

academia.edu

  • In the 1930s, this study was Unemployment and technological change(Report no. G-70, 1940) by Corrington Calhoun Gill of the 'National Research Project on Reemployment Opportunities and Recent changes in Industrial Techniques'. Some earlier Federal reports took a pessimistic view of technological unemployment, e.g. Memorandum on Technological Unemployment (1933) by Ewan Clague Bureau of Labor Statistics. Some authorities – e.g. Udo Sautter in Chpt 5 of Three Cheers for the Unemployed: Government and Unemployment Before the New Deal (Cambridge University Press, 1991) – say that in the early 1930s there was near consensus among US experts that technological unemployment was a major problem. Other's though like Bruce Bartlett in Is Industrial Innovation Destroying Jobs (Cato Journal 1984) argue that most economists remained optimistic even during the 1930s. In the 1960s episode, the major Federal study that bookmarked the end of the period of intense debate was Technology and the American economy (1966) by the 'National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress' established by president Lyndon Johnson in 1964 Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  • Bartlett, Bruce (18 January 2014). "Is industrial innovation destroying jobs?". Cato Journal. Retrieved 14 July 2015.

acting-man.com

afr.com

americanprogress.org

cdn.americanprogress.org

archive.org

aspeninstitute.org

bankofengland.co.uk

bis.org

brookings.edu

businessinsider.com

businesswire.com

cbc.ca

cepr.org

cesj.org

cfeps.org

cnbc.com

cnn.com

money.cnn.com

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

dailykos.com

democracyjournal.org

doi.org

economist.com

eib.org

elibrary.ru

euractiv.com

forrester.com

fortune.com

ft.com

ft.com

video.ft.com

futurism.com

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

hrdive.com

huffingtonpost.com

ilo.org

iza.org

ftp.iza.org

james-albus.org

jetpress.org

jstor.org

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

lrb.co.uk

lse.ac.uk

eprints.lse.ac.uk

managementtoday.co.uk

marginalrevolution.com

marketwatch.com

marshallbrain.com

marxists.org

mckinsey.com

medium.com

mkgandhi.org

  • For a small collection of quotes by Gandhi relating to his view that innovation should be slowed while unemployment exists see The place of machines

nber.org

newspapers.com

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

novaramedia.com

wire.novaramedia.com

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

bits.blogs.nytimes.com

  • Lohr, Steve (6 November 2015). "Automation Will Change Jobs More Than Kill Them". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 November 2015. technology-driven automation will affect most every occupation and can change work, according to new research from McKinsey

oecd-ilibrary.org

opendemocracy.net

ox.ac.uk

oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk

ora.ox.ac.uk

fhi.ox.ac.uk

pbs.org

pcmag.com

pewinternet.org

project-syndicate.org

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

qz.com

repec.org

ideas.repec.org

econpapers.repec.org

researchgate.net

salon.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

taubcenter.org.il

techcrunch.com

technologyreview.com

techtarget.com

searcherp.techtarget.com

tem.fi

theatlantic.com

theguardian.com

thehill.com

thelocal.fr

theverge.com

thezeitgeistmovement.com

ucsb.edu

presidency.ucsb.edu

  • In the 1930s, this study was Unemployment and technological change(Report no. G-70, 1940) by Corrington Calhoun Gill of the 'National Research Project on Reemployment Opportunities and Recent changes in Industrial Techniques'. Some earlier Federal reports took a pessimistic view of technological unemployment, e.g. Memorandum on Technological Unemployment (1933) by Ewan Clague Bureau of Labor Statistics. Some authorities – e.g. Udo Sautter in Chpt 5 of Three Cheers for the Unemployed: Government and Unemployment Before the New Deal (Cambridge University Press, 1991) – say that in the early 1930s there was near consensus among US experts that technological unemployment was a major problem. Other's though like Bruce Bartlett in Is Industrial Innovation Destroying Jobs (Cato Journal 1984) argue that most economists remained optimistic even during the 1930s. In the 1960s episode, the major Federal study that bookmarked the end of the period of intense debate was Technology and the American economy (1966) by the 'National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress' established by president Lyndon Johnson in 1964 Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine

umkc.edu

cas.umkc.edu

utoronto.ca

economics.utoronto.ca

vice.com

vice.com

motherboard.vice.com

vox.com

web.archive.org

weforum.org

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

wired.com

worldbank.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com

online.wsj.com

youtube.com