Viviano, 1999, p. 49. Viviano, Pauline A. (1999). «Source Criticism». En Haynes, Stephen R.; McKenzie, Steven L., eds. To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and Their Application. Westminster John Knox. ISBN978-0-664-25784-2.
Cowley, 2005, p. xxiii. «So far as we learn from these texts Moses might never have existed, there might have been no bondage in Egypt, no exodus, no monarchy, no prophets. There is no mention of other tribes and no claim to any heritage in the land of Judah. Among the numerous names of colonists, Abraham, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Samuel, David, so common in later times, never occur (nor in Nehemiah), nor any other name derived from their past history as recorded in the Pentateuch and early literature. It is almost incredible, but it is true». Cowley, Arthur (2005). Aramaic Papyri of the Fifth Century B.C.. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers. pp. xx-xxiii. ISBN1-59752-3631.
Cowley, 2005, p. xx. «There is no hint of any suspicion that the [Elephantine] temple could be considered heretical, and they would surely not have appealed to the High Priest at Jerusalem if they had felt any doubt about it. On the contrary they give the impression of being proud of having a temple of their own, and as pious devotees of Ya'u [Yahweh] (no other god is mentioned in the petition) seriously distressed at the loss of religious opportunities caused by its destruction». Cowley, Arthur (2005). Aramaic Papyri of the Fifth Century B.C.. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers. pp. xx-xxiii. ISBN1-59752-3631.
Viviano, 1999, p. 41. Viviano, Pauline A. (1999). «Source Criticism». En Haynes, Stephen R.; McKenzie, Steven L., eds. To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and Their Application. Westminster John Knox. ISBN978-0-664-25784-2.
Carr, 2014, pp. 455–456. Carr, David M. (2014). «Changes in Pentateuchal Criticism». En Saeboe, Magne; Ska, Jean Louis; Machinist, Peter, eds. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. III: From Modernism to Post-Modernism. Part II: The Twentieth Century – From Modernism to Post-Modernism. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN978-3-525-54022-0.
Van Seters, 2015, pp. 79–82. «Scholars generally designate these strata as 'deuteronomic' (dt) for the material belonging to the core document of the Josiah reform and 'Deuteronomistic' (dtr) for one or more subsequent strata that belong to later redactions [...]». Van Seters, John (2015). The Pentateuch: A Social-Science Commentary. Bloomsbury T&T Clark. ISBN978-0-567-65880-7.
Van Seters, 1998, pp. 18ff. Van Seters, John (1998). «The Pentateuch». En Steven L. McKenzie; Matt Patrick Graham, eds. The Hebrew Bible Today: An Introduction to Critical Issues. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN9780664256524.
Block, 2005, p. 172. Block, Daniel I. (2005). «Deuteronomy». En Kevin J. Vanhoozer, ed. Dictionary for Theological Interpretation of the Bible. Baker Academic. ISBN9780801026942.
Römer, 2006, p. 9. «Even scholars still holding to this [Documentary] model, such as Horst Seebass, for instance, must concede: ‹Among all source critical-theories about the Pentateuch, J is the most unstable one›». Römer, Thomas Christian (2006). «The Elusive Yahwist: A Short History of Research». En Dozeman, Thomas B.; Schmid, Konrad, eds. A Farewell to the Yahwist?: The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation. ISBN978-1-58983-163-6.
Ruddick, 1990, p. 246. Ruddick, Eddie L. (1990). «Elohist». En Mills, Watson E.; Bullard, Roger Aubrey, eds. Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Press. ISBN978-0-86554-373-7.
Viviano, 1999, p. 38–39. Viviano, Pauline A. (1999). «Source Criticism». En Haynes, Stephen R.; McKenzie, Steven L., eds. To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and Their Application. Westminster John Knox. ISBN978-0-664-25784-2.
Viviano, 1999, p. 38. Viviano, Pauline A. (1999). «Source Criticism». En Haynes, Stephen R.; McKenzie, Steven L., eds. To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and Their Application. Westminster John Knox. ISBN978-0-664-25784-2.
Viviano, 1999, p. 40. Viviano, Pauline A. (1999). «Source Criticism». En Haynes, Stephen R.; McKenzie, Steven L., eds. To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and Their Application. Westminster John Knox. ISBN978-0-664-25784-2.
Viviano, 1999, p. 40–41. Viviano, Pauline A. (1999). «Source Criticism». En Haynes, Stephen R.; McKenzie, Steven L., eds. To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and Their Application. Westminster John Knox. ISBN978-0-664-25784-2.
Viviano, 1999, p. 51. Viviano, Pauline A. (1999). «Source Criticism». En Haynes, Stephen R.; McKenzie, Steven L., eds. To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and Their Application. Westminster John Knox. ISBN978-0-664-25784-2.
Carr, 2014, p. 434. Carr, David M. (2014). «Changes in Pentateuchal Criticism». En Saeboe, Magne; Ska, Jean Louis; Machinist, Peter, eds. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. III: From Modernism to Post-Modernism. Part II: The Twentieth Century – From Modernism to Post-Modernism. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN978-3-525-54022-0.
Carr, 2014, p. 436. Carr, David M. (2014). «Changes in Pentateuchal Criticism». En Saeboe, Magne; Ska, Jean Louis; Machinist, Peter, eds. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. III: From Modernism to Post-Modernism. Part II: The Twentieth Century – From Modernism to Post-Modernism. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN978-3-525-54022-0.
Carr, 2014, p. 457. Carr, David M. (2014). «Changes in Pentateuchal Criticism». En Saeboe, Magne; Ska, Jean Louis; Machinist, Peter, eds. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. III: From Modernism to Post-Modernism. Part II: The Twentieth Century – From Modernism to Post-Modernism. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN978-3-525-54022-0.
Barkay et al., 2003. Barkay, Gabriel et al. (2003). «The Challenges of Ketef Hinnom: Using Advanced Technologies to Recover the Earliest Biblical Texts and their Context». Near Eastern Archaeology66 (4): 162-171. JSTOR3557916. doi:10.2307/3557916.
Young, 2005, p. 344. Young, Ian (2005). «Biblical Texts Cannot be Dated Linguistically». Hebrew Studies46: 341-351. doi:10.1353/hbr.2005.0038.
Hurvitz, 2000. Hurvitz, Avi (2000). «Once Again: The Linguistic Profile of the Priestly Material in the Pentateuch and its Historical Age. A Response to J. Blenkinsopp». Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft112 (2): 180-191. doi:10.1515/zatw.2000.112.2.180.
Young, 2005, p. 342–343. Young, Ian (2005). «Biblical Texts Cannot be Dated Linguistically». Hebrew Studies46: 341-351. doi:10.1353/hbr.2005.0038.
Young, 2005, p. 345. Young, Ian (2005). «Biblical Texts Cannot be Dated Linguistically». Hebrew Studies46: 341-351. doi:10.1353/hbr.2005.0038.
Young, 2005, p. 341. Young, Ian (2005). «Biblical Texts Cannot be Dated Linguistically». Hebrew Studies46: 341-351. doi:10.1353/hbr.2005.0038.
Fried, 2002. Fried, Lisebeth S. (2002). «The High Places (Bāmôt) and the Reforms of Hezekiah and Josiah: An Archaeological Investigation». Journal of the American Oriental Society122 (3): 437-465. JSTOR3087515. doi:10.2307/3087515.
Jonker, Louis C. (2 de enero de 2019). «Achaemenid Understanding of Law and Justice in Darius I’s Tomb Inscriptions: Are There Any Connections with Hebrew Bible Pentateuchal Conceptions?». Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament33 (1): 24-41. ISSN0901-8328. doi:10.1080/09018328.2019.1599625.
Lemche, 1993. Lemche, Niels Peter (1993). «The Old Testament – a Hellenistic Book?». Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament7 (2): 163-193. doi:10.1080/09018329308585016.
Van Seters, 2007, pp. 212–213. Van Seters, John (2007). «Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus: Hellenistic Histories and the Date of the Pentateuch. By Russell E. Gmirkin.». The Journal of Theological Studies59 (1): 212-214. doi:10.1093/jts/flm136.
Van Seters, 2007, p. 212. «All references to the stories of Genesis or Exodus in the rest of the Hebrew Bible, such as the numerous allusions in Second Isaiah to creation, to the flood story, to the patriarchs, to the exodus and sea crossing, to the wilderness journey, are disqualified as unreliable for dating the Pentateuch and are therefore not even considered». Van Seters, John (2007). «Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus: Hellenistic Histories and the Date of the Pentateuch. By Russell E. Gmirkin.». The Journal of Theological Studies59 (1): 212-214. doi:10.1093/jts/flm136.
issn.org
portal.issn.org
Jonker, Louis C. (2 de enero de 2019). «Achaemenid Understanding of Law and Justice in Darius I’s Tomb Inscriptions: Are There Any Connections with Hebrew Bible Pentateuchal Conceptions?». Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament33 (1): 24-41. ISSN0901-8328. doi:10.1080/09018328.2019.1599625.
jstor.org
Whisenant, 2010, p. 679. «Instead of a compilation of discrete sources collected and combined by a final redactor, the Pentateuch is seen as a sophisticated scribal composition in which diverse earlier traditions have been shaped into a coherent narrative presenting a creation-to-wilderness story of origins for the entity ‹Israel›». Whisenant, Jessica (2010). «The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance by Gary N. Knoppers, Bernard M. Levinson». Journal of the American Oriental Society130 (4): 679-681. JSTOR23044597.
Barkay et al., 2003. Barkay, Gabriel et al. (2003). «The Challenges of Ketef Hinnom: Using Advanced Technologies to Recover the Earliest Biblical Texts and their Context». Near Eastern Archaeology66 (4): 162-171. JSTOR3557916. doi:10.2307/3557916.
Fried, 2002. Fried, Lisebeth S. (2002). «The High Places (Bāmôt) and the Reforms of Hezekiah and Josiah: An Archaeological Investigation». Journal of the American Oriental Society122 (3): 437-465. JSTOR3087515. doi:10.2307/3087515.
youtube.com
Gmirkin, 2016b, 48:03. «The prophets are mostly very late, but there is some early material in them as well. We know that they're late because for one thing, most of the prophets refer to writings from the books of Moses, and so they have to come after 270 BC». Gmirkin, Russell (11 de diciembre de 2016). Interview with Russell Gmirkin: What Does Plato Have To Do With the Bible?. (Entrevista). Signs of the Times.net. Consultado el 22 de julio de 2019.