מדע המוסר (Hebrew Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "מדע המוסר" in Hebrew language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Hebrew rank
4th place
18th place
2nd place
10th place
low place
low place
6th place
48th place
179th place
158th place
low place
low place
731st place
161st place
3rd place
33rd place
456th place
698th place
92nd place
167th place
low place
low place
low place
74th place
857th place
207th place

archive.org

books.google.com

doi.org

hayadan.org.il

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

npr.org

  • Sean Carroll (2010-05-04). "Science And Morality: You Can't Derive 'Ought' From 'Is'". NPR. נבדק ב-2010-06-14. Casting morality as a maximization problem might seem overly restrictive at first glance, but the procedure can potentially account for a wide variety of approaches. A libertarian might want to maximize a feeling of personal freedom, while a traditional utilitarian might want to maximize some version of happiness. The point is simply that the goal of morality should be to create certain conditions that are, in principle, directly measurable by empirical means. ...Nevertheless, I want to argue that this program is simply not possible. ... Morality is not part of science, however much we would like it to be. There are a large number of arguments one could advance for in support of this claim, but I'll stick to three.

project-reason.org

  • Sam Harris (2010-03-29). "Moral confusion in the name of "science"". PROJECT REASON. נבדק ב-2014-12-06. There are also very practical, moral concerns that follow from the glib idea that anyone is free to value anything—the most consequential being that it is precisely what allows highly educated, secular, and otherwise well-intentioned people to pause thoughtfully, and often interminably, before condemning practices like compulsory veiling, genital excision, bride-burning, forced marriage, and the other cheerful products of alternative “morality” found elsewhere in the world. Fanciers of Hume’s is/ought distinction never seem to realize what the stakes are, and they do not see what an abject failure of compassion their intellectual “tolerance” of moral difference amounts to. While much of this debate must be had in academic terms, this is not merely an academic debate. There are women and girls getting their faces burned off with acid at this moment for daring to learn to read, or for not consenting to marry men they have never met, or even for the crime of getting raped.

sagepub.com

jcs.sagepub.com

salon.com

  • www.salon.com Asked "Let's say scientists do end up discovering moral truths. How are they supposed to enforce their findings? Would they become something like policemen or priests?" Harris writes "They wouldn’t necessarily enforce them any more than they enforce their knowledge about human health. What are scientists doing with the knowledge that smoking causes cancer or obesity is bad for your health, or that the common cold is spread by not washing your hands? We’re not living in some Orwellian world where we have scientists in lab coats at every door. Imagine we discovered that there is a best way to teach your children to be compassionate, or to defer short-term gratification in the service of a long-term goal. What if it turns out to be true that calcium intake in the first two years of life has a significant effect on a child’s emotional life? If we learn that, what parent wouldn’t want that knowledge? The fear of a "Brave New World" component to this argument is unfounded."

samharris.org

sciencemag.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Lenman, James (2008). "Moral Naturalism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 ed.).

thesciencenetwork.org