Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Antisionismo (Italian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Antisionismo" in Italian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Italian rank
20web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
2guardian.co.uk
197th place
106th place
2loc.gov
70th place
130th place
2worldcat.org
5th place
26th place
1treccani.it
182nd place
6th place
1hoepli.it
low place
1,106th place
1zionism-israel.com
low place
low place
1webcitation.org
24th place
48th place
1lrb.co.uk
3,577th place
5,327th place
1nybooks.com
1,785th place
1,718th place
1archive.is
87th place
low place
1washingtonpost.com
34th place
116th place
1archive.org
6th place
8th place
1books.google.com
3rd place
14th place
1thenation.com
2,088th place
6,070th place
1baltimorechronicle.com
low place
low place
1jewsagainstzionism.com
low place
low place

archive.is

  • Ilan Pappe, La bolla di sapone di Ginevra, su Jura Gentium - Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, febbraio 2018. URL consultato il 29 novembre 2020 (archiviato dall'url originale il 21 agosto 2007).

archive.org

  • Walter Laqueur, Golda Meir and the Post-Zionists, in Dying for Jerusalem: the past, present and future of the holiest city, Naperville (Illinois), Sourcebooks, Inc., marzo 2006, pp. pg. 55, ISBN 978-1-4022-0632-0, LCCN 2005025006, OCLC 61704687.
    «...behind the cover of "anti-Zionism" lurks a variety of motives that ought to be called by their true name. When, in the 1950s under Stalin, the Jews of the Soviet Union came under severe attack and scores were executed, it was under the banner of anti-Zionism rather than anti-Semitism, which had been given a bad name by Adolf Hitler. When in later years the policy of Israeli governments was attacked as racist or colonialist in various parts of the world, the basis of the criticism was quite often the belief that Israel had no right to exist in the first place, not opposition to specific policies of the Israeli government. Traditional anti-Semitism has gone out of fashion in the West except on the extreme right. But something we might call post-anti-Semitism has taken its place. It is less violent in its aims, but still very real. By and large it has not been too difficult to differentiate between genuine and bogus anti-Zionism. The test is twofold. It is almost always clear whether the attacks are directed against a specific policy carried out by an Israeli government (for instance, as an occupying power) or against the existence of Israel. Secondly, there is the test of selectivity. If from all the evils besetting the world, the misdeeds, real or imaginary, of Zionism are singled out and given constant and relentless publicity, it can be taken for granted that the true motive is not anti-Zionism but something different and more sweeping.»

baltimorechronicle.com

books.google.com

  • Steven J. Zipperstein, Historical Reflections on Contemporary Antisemitism, in Derek J. Penslar, Michael R. Marrus, and Janice Gross Stein, eds. (a cura di), Contemporary antisemitism: Canada and the world, Toronto, Ontario, University of Toronto Press, 2005, pp. 60–61, LCCN 2005277647, OCLC 56531591. URL consultato il 27 febbraio 2007.
    «Speaking, however, in terms of the preoccupations of intellectuals in the West, it seems that responses to Jews and the Jewish state are not fundamentally the byproduct of antisemitism. They are, above all, a by-product of the wildly disproportionate responses that mark the post-September 11 world. Disproportionate reaction seems increasingly the norm, especially in regards to antipathy for the United States, antipathy that has meshed, it seems to me, with an outsized antagonism for its smallest but singularly visible Middle East ally, Israel. Distinguishing such reaction from antisemitism without denying that the two coincide is not meant to dismiss the significance of such attitudes, which remain troubling, but in ways different from how they have been widely understood....What Raab means by anti-Israelism is the increasing role that a concerted, vigorous, prejudice against Israel — and he does see such sentiments as born of prejudice — has played in much of the political left, visibly in the antiglobalist campaign, but where there is no discernible hatred of Jews. Often, in this context, belief in Israel's mendacity is shaped, above all, by simple, crude, linear notions of the causal relationship between politics, oppression, and liberation, by transparent beliefs in a world with clear-cut oppressors and oppressed — in other words, by a much distorted, simplistic, but this-worldly political analysis devoid of anti-Jewish bias. Such prejudice against Israel is not antisemitism, although undoubtedly the two can and at times do coexist.»

guardian.co.uk

commentisfree.guardian.co.uk

hoepli.it

dizionari.hoepli.it

jewsagainstzionism.com

  • [1] Jews Against Zionism

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

  • Walter Laqueur, Golda Meir and the Post-Zionists, in Dying for Jerusalem: the past, present and future of the holiest city, Naperville (Illinois), Sourcebooks, Inc., marzo 2006, pp. pg. 55, ISBN 978-1-4022-0632-0, LCCN 2005025006, OCLC 61704687.
    «...behind the cover of "anti-Zionism" lurks a variety of motives that ought to be called by their true name. When, in the 1950s under Stalin, the Jews of the Soviet Union came under severe attack and scores were executed, it was under the banner of anti-Zionism rather than anti-Semitism, which had been given a bad name by Adolf Hitler. When in later years the policy of Israeli governments was attacked as racist or colonialist in various parts of the world, the basis of the criticism was quite often the belief that Israel had no right to exist in the first place, not opposition to specific policies of the Israeli government. Traditional anti-Semitism has gone out of fashion in the West except on the extreme right. But something we might call post-anti-Semitism has taken its place. It is less violent in its aims, but still very real. By and large it has not been too difficult to differentiate between genuine and bogus anti-Zionism. The test is twofold. It is almost always clear whether the attacks are directed against a specific policy carried out by an Israeli government (for instance, as an occupying power) or against the existence of Israel. Secondly, there is the test of selectivity. If from all the evils besetting the world, the misdeeds, real or imaginary, of Zionism are singled out and given constant and relentless publicity, it can be taken for granted that the true motive is not anti-Zionism but something different and more sweeping.»
  • Steven J. Zipperstein, Historical Reflections on Contemporary Antisemitism, in Derek J. Penslar, Michael R. Marrus, and Janice Gross Stein, eds. (a cura di), Contemporary antisemitism: Canada and the world, Toronto, Ontario, University of Toronto Press, 2005, pp. 60–61, LCCN 2005277647, OCLC 56531591. URL consultato il 27 febbraio 2007.
    «Speaking, however, in terms of the preoccupations of intellectuals in the West, it seems that responses to Jews and the Jewish state are not fundamentally the byproduct of antisemitism. They are, above all, a by-product of the wildly disproportionate responses that mark the post-September 11 world. Disproportionate reaction seems increasingly the norm, especially in regards to antipathy for the United States, antipathy that has meshed, it seems to me, with an outsized antagonism for its smallest but singularly visible Middle East ally, Israel. Distinguishing such reaction from antisemitism without denying that the two coincide is not meant to dismiss the significance of such attitudes, which remain troubling, but in ways different from how they have been widely understood....What Raab means by anti-Israelism is the increasing role that a concerted, vigorous, prejudice against Israel — and he does see such sentiments as born of prejudice — has played in much of the political left, visibly in the antiglobalist campaign, but where there is no discernible hatred of Jews. Often, in this context, belief in Israel's mendacity is shaped, above all, by simple, crude, linear notions of the causal relationship between politics, oppression, and liberation, by transparent beliefs in a world with clear-cut oppressors and oppressed — in other words, by a much distorted, simplistic, but this-worldly political analysis devoid of anti-Jewish bias. Such prejudice against Israel is not antisemitism, although undoubtedly the two can and at times do coexist.»

lrb.co.uk

nybooks.com

thenation.com

treccani.it

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

  • Yehuda Bauer: Anti-Semitism, su kqed.org (archiviato dall'url originale il 5 dicembre 2008)., intervista di Michael Krasny a Yehuda Bauer su KQED-FM l'11 gennaio 2005
  • Raffaella A. Del Sarto, Israel's Contested Identity and the Mediterranean, The territorial-political axis: Eretz Israel versus Medinat Israel, p.8 (PDF), su ies.berkeley.edu (archiviato dall'url originale il 10 giugno 2010).

    Reflecting the traditional divisions within the Zionist movement, this axis invokes two concepts, namely Eretz Israel, i.e. the biblical ‘Land of Israel’, and Medinat Israel, i.e. the Jewish and democratic State of Israel. While the concept of Medinat Israel dominated the first decades of statehood in accordance with the aspirations of Labour Zionism, the 1967 conquest of land that was part of ‘biblical Israel’ provided a material basis for the ascent of the concept of Eretz Israel. Expressing the perception of rightful Jewish claims on ‘biblical land’, the construction of Jewish settlements in the conquered territories intensified after the 1977 elections, which ended the dominance of the Labour Party. Yet as the first Intifada made disturbingly visible, Israel's de facto rule over the Palestinian population created a dilemma of democracy versus Jewish majority in the long run. With the beginning of Oslo and the option of territorial compromise, the rift between supporters of Eretz Israel and Medinat Israel deepened to an unprecedented degree, the assassination of Prime Minister Rabin in November 1995 being the most dramatic evidence.

  • Copia archiviata, su myjewishlearning.com. URL consultato il 30 marzo 2016 (archiviato dall'url originale il 25 febbraio 2008). Rachael Gelfman, Religious Zionists believe that the Jewish return to Israel hastens the Messiah
  • Copia archiviata, su uscj.org. URL consultato il 30 marzo 2016 (archiviato dall'url originale il 7 giugno 2011). Ehud Bandel - President, the Masorti Movement, Zionism
  • Copia archiviata, su ccarnet.org. URL consultato il 30 gennaio 2009 (archiviato dall'url originale il 25 novembre 2011).
  • (EN) Report on Palestine administration 1922, su domino.un.org (archiviato dall'url originale il 29 ottobre 2013)., riportato sul sito dell'ONU
  • (EN) United Nations Special Committee on Palestine, Recommendations to the General Assembly, A/364, 3 September 1947, su domino.un.org (archiviato dall'url originale il 28 settembre 2013).
  • (EN) Letters to The Times New York Times December 4, 1948, su physics.harvard.edu (archiviato dall'url originale l'11 gennaio 2012).
  • Copia archiviata, su politics.ox.ac.uk. URL consultato il 14 luglio 2006 (archiviato dall'url originale il 27 maggio 2007).
  • Tom Segev, su gazette.de. URL consultato il 19 aprile 2007 (archiviato dall'url originale l'11 marzo 2007).
  • Intervista a Ilan Pappe, su it.altermedia.info (archiviato dall'url originale il 16 gennaio 2008).
  • Alternative Information Center, su alternativenews.org (archiviato dall'url originale il 7 maggio 2007).
  • Letter of resignation from the jewish people by Bertell Ollman, su facpub.stjohns.edu. URL consultato il 20 aprile 2007 (archiviato dall'url originale il 27 settembre 2007).
  • Intervista a Michel Warschawski, su italia.attac.org (archiviato dall'url originale il 5 giugno 2015).
  • Alternative Information Center, su alternativenews.org. URL consultato il 17 aprile 2007 (archiviato dall'url originale il 15 agosto 2000).
  • Copia archiviata, su icahd.org. URL consultato il 10 agosto 2007 (archiviato dall'url originale il 21 agosto 2007).
  • Robert S. Wistrich, Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism, in Jewish Political Studies Review, vol. 16, 3–4, Fall 2004. URL consultato il 26 febbraio 2007 (archiviato dall'url originale il 29 settembre 2007).
    Nevertheless, I believe that the more radical forms of anti-Zionism that have emerged with renewed force in recent years do display unmistakable analogies to European anti-Semitism immediately preceding the Holocaust....For example, "anti-Zionists" who insist on comparing Zionism and the Jews with Hitler and the Third Reich appear unmistakably to be de facto anti-Semites, even if they vehemently deny the fact! This is largely because they knowingly exploit the reality that Nazism in the postwar world has become the defining metaphor of absolute evil. For if Zionists are "Nazis" and if Sharon really is Hitler, then it becomes a moral obligation to wage war against Israel. That is the bottom line of much contemporary anti-Zionism. In practice, this has become the most potent form of contemporary anti-Semitism....Anti-Zionism is not only the historic heir of earlier forms of anti-Semitism. Today, it is also the lowest common denominator and the bridge between the Left, the Right, and the militant Muslims; between the elites (including the media) and the masses; between the churches and the mosques; between an increasingly anti-American Europe and an endemically anti-Western Arab-Muslim Middle East; a point of convergence between conservatives and radicals and a connecting link between fathers and sons.
  • Working Definition of Antisemitism (PDF), su eumc.eu.int
  • Edward Said, America's Last Taboo, in New Left Review, vol. 6, novembre–dicembre 2000, pp. 45–53. URL consultato il 26 febbraio 2007 (archiviato dall'url originale il 19 febbraio 2007). “For a totalitarian Zionism, any criticism of Israel is proof of the rankest anti-semitism. If you do not refrain, you will be hounded as an anti-semite requiring the severest opprobrium. In the Orwellian logic of American Zionism, it is impermissible to speak of Jewish violence or Jewish terror when it comes to Israel, even though everything done by Israel is done in the name of the Jewish people, by and for a Jewish state.”
  • Dror Feiler, Letter sent to the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia concerning the Working Definition of Antisemitism, su jfjfp.org

webcitation.org

worldcat.org

  • Walter Laqueur, Golda Meir and the Post-Zionists, in Dying for Jerusalem: the past, present and future of the holiest city, Naperville (Illinois), Sourcebooks, Inc., marzo 2006, pp. pg. 55, ISBN 978-1-4022-0632-0, LCCN 2005025006, OCLC 61704687.
    «...behind the cover of "anti-Zionism" lurks a variety of motives that ought to be called by their true name. When, in the 1950s under Stalin, the Jews of the Soviet Union came under severe attack and scores were executed, it was under the banner of anti-Zionism rather than anti-Semitism, which had been given a bad name by Adolf Hitler. When in later years the policy of Israeli governments was attacked as racist or colonialist in various parts of the world, the basis of the criticism was quite often the belief that Israel had no right to exist in the first place, not opposition to specific policies of the Israeli government. Traditional anti-Semitism has gone out of fashion in the West except on the extreme right. But something we might call post-anti-Semitism has taken its place. It is less violent in its aims, but still very real. By and large it has not been too difficult to differentiate between genuine and bogus anti-Zionism. The test is twofold. It is almost always clear whether the attacks are directed against a specific policy carried out by an Israeli government (for instance, as an occupying power) or against the existence of Israel. Secondly, there is the test of selectivity. If from all the evils besetting the world, the misdeeds, real or imaginary, of Zionism are singled out and given constant and relentless publicity, it can be taken for granted that the true motive is not anti-Zionism but something different and more sweeping.»
  • Steven J. Zipperstein, Historical Reflections on Contemporary Antisemitism, in Derek J. Penslar, Michael R. Marrus, and Janice Gross Stein, eds. (a cura di), Contemporary antisemitism: Canada and the world, Toronto, Ontario, University of Toronto Press, 2005, pp. 60–61, LCCN 2005277647, OCLC 56531591. URL consultato il 27 febbraio 2007.
    «Speaking, however, in terms of the preoccupations of intellectuals in the West, it seems that responses to Jews and the Jewish state are not fundamentally the byproduct of antisemitism. They are, above all, a by-product of the wildly disproportionate responses that mark the post-September 11 world. Disproportionate reaction seems increasingly the norm, especially in regards to antipathy for the United States, antipathy that has meshed, it seems to me, with an outsized antagonism for its smallest but singularly visible Middle East ally, Israel. Distinguishing such reaction from antisemitism without denying that the two coincide is not meant to dismiss the significance of such attitudes, which remain troubling, but in ways different from how they have been widely understood....What Raab means by anti-Israelism is the increasing role that a concerted, vigorous, prejudice against Israel — and he does see such sentiments as born of prejudice — has played in much of the political left, visibly in the antiglobalist campaign, but where there is no discernible hatred of Jews. Often, in this context, belief in Israel's mendacity is shaped, above all, by simple, crude, linear notions of the causal relationship between politics, oppression, and liberation, by transparent beliefs in a world with clear-cut oppressors and oppressed — in other words, by a much distorted, simplistic, but this-worldly political analysis devoid of anti-Jewish bias. Such prejudice against Israel is not antisemitism, although undoubtedly the two can and at times do coexist.»

zionism-israel.com

  • Aliyah, su zionism-israel.com.