Javaの性能 (Japanese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Javaの性能" in Japanese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Japanese rank
5,060th place
4,378th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,131st place
838th place
9,107th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,158th place
5,078th place
3,857th place
4,231st place
424th place
1,052nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,696th place
7,892nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,669th place
2,149th place
low place
low place
4,903rd place
low place
7,590th place
low place

artima.com

bytonic.de

cosylab.com

cosylib.cosylab.com

  • Igor, Kri?nar (2005年5月10日). “SWT Vs. Swing Performance Comparison”. cosylab.com. 2008年5月24日閲覧。 “Initial expectation before performing this benchmark was to find SWT outperform Swing. This expectation stemmed from greater responsiveness of SWT-based Java applications (e.g., Eclipse IDE) compared to Swing-based applications. However, this expectation could not be quantitatively confirmed.

ddj.com

debian.org

shootout.alioth.debian.org

  • Python にはPsycoがあるが、扱えるコードが限定されており、また Psyco を利用しても Java より性能が低い(リンク参照)。
  • mandelbrot benchmark”. Computer Language Benchmarks Game. 2008年2月16日閲覧。

findarticles.com

headius.blogspot.com

  • Nutter, Charles (2008年1月28日). “Lang.NET 2008: Day 1 Thoughts”. 2008年4月20日閲覧。 “Deoptimization is very exciting when dealing with performance concerns, since it means you can make much more aggressive optimizations...knowing you'll be able to fall back on a tried and true safe path later on

ibm.com

infoq.com

infoworld.com

inria.fr

hal.inria.fr

  • Brian Amedro, Vladimir Bodnartchouk, Denis Caromel, Christian Delbe, Fabrice Huet, Guillermo L. Taboada (August 2008). “Current State of Java for HPC”. INRIA. 2008年9月4日閲覧。 “We first perform some micro benchmarks for various JVMs, showing the overall good performance for basic arithmetic operations(...). Comparing this implementation with a Fortran/MPI one, we show that they have similar performance on computation intensive benchmarks, but still have scalability issues when performing intensive communications.

java.net

weblogs.java.net

jdk.dev.java.net

forums.java.net

jcp.org

jfree.org

  • See here for a benchmark showing an approximately 60% performance boost from Java 5.0 to 6 for the application JFreeChart

jroller.com

  • See here for a benchmark showing an approximately 60% performance boost from Java 5.0 to 6 for the application JFreeChart

osnews.com

scribblethink.org

  • Lewis, J.P.; Neumann, Ulrich. “Performance of Java versus C++”. Computer Graphics and Immersive Technology Lab, University of Southern California. 2009年7月4日閲覧。

shudo.net

sourceforge.net

janet-project.sourceforge.net

sun.com

java.sun.com

blogs.sun.com

bugs.sun.com

developers.sun.com

symantec.com

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

  • 例えば、停止時間が大幅に短くなっている。Java で書かれたQuake 2の例を参照Jake2

yahoo.net

developer.yahoo.net

  • Owen O'Malley - Yahoo! Grid Computing Team (July 2008). “Apache Hadoop Wins Terabyte Sort Benchmark”. 2008年12月21日閲覧。 “This is the first time that either a Java or an open source program has won.