자본주의의 역사 (Korean Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "자본주의의 역사" in Korean language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Korean rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
9th place
26th place
70th place
2nd place
3rd place
5th place
11th place
7th place
36th place
6th place
18th place
485th place
371st place
488th place
556th place
18th place
27th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,952nd place
2,694th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
40th place
78th place
1,295th place
531st place
low place
low place
198th place
410th place
230th place
278th place
626th place
596th place
12th place
65th place
142nd place
199th place
140th place
251st place
2,932nd place
5,948th place
5,166th place
4,740th place
low place
low place
49th place
110th place
34th place
124th place
3,142nd place
6,869th place
446th place
765th place
8th place
34th place
4th place
4th place

archive.org

archives.gov

georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov

bahs.org.uk

bartleby.com

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

books.google.com

britannica.com

businessinsider.com

clemson.edu

columbia.edu

cup.columbia.edu

columbia.edu

doi.org

dx.doi.org

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel (1976). “From Feudalism to Capitalism: Transition or Transitions?”. 《Social Forces》 55 (2): 273–283. doi:10.2307/2576224. ISSN 0037-7732. JSTOR 2576224. 
  • Desai, Radhika (2022). 《Capitalism, Coronavirus and War: A Geopolitical Economy》. Routledge. 6–8, 179쪽. doi:10.4324/9781003200000. ISBN 9781032059501. While the balance of class power remains heavily tilted in favour of capital in its homelands, the balance of international power is tilting markedly away from capitalism, driving all outside the charmed circle of the United States, Europe, Japan and the settler colonies bit by bit, with advances and reverses, steadily away from the major capitalist countries and probably, from capitalism. This process began with the Russian Revolution and, after the reverses of the 1990s, resumed in the new century as an alliance of countries seeking to assert their economic and security sovereignty—including Russia, Venezuela, Cuba and Iran—began forming with China as its economic centre. The pandemic and the war have accelerated these processes. 
  • Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists' warning on affluence”. 《Nature Communications11 (3107): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. The second, more radical, group disagrees and argues that the needed socio-ecological transformation will necessarily entail a shift beyond capitalism and/or current centralised states. Although comprising considerable heterogeneity, it can be divided into eco-socialist approaches, viewing the democratic state as an important means to achieve the socio-ecological transformation and eco-anarchist approaches, aiming instead at participatory democracy without a state, thus minimising hierarchies. Many degrowth approaches combine elements of the two, but often see a stronger role for state action than eco-anarchists. 

ebhsoc.org

  • Lou Galambos, "Is This a Decisive Moment for the History of Business, Economic History, and the History of Capitalism? Essays in Economic & Business History (2014) v. 32 pp. 1–18 online

harvard.edu

hup.harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

  • Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists' warning on affluence”. 《Nature Communications11 (3107): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. The second, more radical, group disagrees and argues that the needed socio-ecological transformation will necessarily entail a shift beyond capitalism and/or current centralised states. Although comprising considerable heterogeneity, it can be divided into eco-socialist approaches, viewing the democratic state as an important means to achieve the socio-ecological transformation and eco-anarchist approaches, aiming instead at participatory democracy without a state, thus minimising hierarchies. Many degrowth approaches combine elements of the two, but often see a stronger role for state action than eco-anarchists. 

iiasa.ac.at

imf.org

independentmail.com

archive.independentmail.com

jacobinmag.com

jstor.org

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists' warning on affluence”. 《Nature Communications11 (3107): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. The second, more radical, group disagrees and argues that the needed socio-ecological transformation will necessarily entail a shift beyond capitalism and/or current centralised states. Although comprising considerable heterogeneity, it can be divided into eco-socialist approaches, viewing the democratic state as an important means to achieve the socio-ecological transformation and eco-anarchist approaches, aiming instead at participatory democracy without a state, thus minimising hierarchies. Many degrowth approaches combine elements of the two, but often see a stronger role for state action than eco-anarchists. 

nytimes.com

orbooks.com

oup.com

global.oup.com

pbs.org

  • “PBS.org”. PBS.org. 1929년 10월 24일. 2010년 7월 31일에 확인함. 

reuters.com

routledge.com

sites.google.com

socialistreviewindex.org.uk

pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk

taylorfrancis.com

  • Desai, Radhika (2022). 《Capitalism, Coronavirus and War: A Geopolitical Economy》. Routledge. 6–8, 179쪽. doi:10.4324/9781003200000. ISBN 9781032059501. While the balance of class power remains heavily tilted in favour of capital in its homelands, the balance of international power is tilting markedly away from capitalism, driving all outside the charmed circle of the United States, Europe, Japan and the settler colonies bit by bit, with advances and reverses, steadily away from the major capitalist countries and probably, from capitalism. This process began with the Russian Revolution and, after the reverses of the 1990s, resumed in the new century as an alliance of countries seeking to assert their economic and security sovereignty—including Russia, Venezuela, Cuba and Iran—began forming with China as its economic centre. The pandemic and the war have accelerated these processes. 

theguardian.com

uchicago.edu

press.uchicago.edu

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org