Evolutietheorie (Dutch Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Evolutietheorie" in Dutch language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Dutch rank
1st place
1st place
9,502nd place
3,869th place
low place
low place
2nd place
8th place
2,821st place
3,045th place
low place
3,830th place
3,867th place
5,236th place
low place
low place
580th place
889th place
906th place
5th place
857th place
261st place
234th place
128th place
4th place
12th place
4,858th place
4,133rd place
7,357th place
8,509th place
1,076th place
6th place
27th place
109th place
low place
low place
7th place
27th place
low place
low place

actionbioscience.org

annualreviews.org

benthamopen.com

berkeley.edu

ucmp.berkeley.edu

darwin-online.org.uk

  • De site Darwin-online.org bevat links naar de oorspronkelijke tekst van de eerste 6 edities van 'The origins of species'. De tekst van de 2e editie is gebruikt als bron bij dit artikel. Gearchiveerd op 17 juni 2023.

doi.org

doi.org

dx.doi.org

nature.com

ncse.com

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Mark Greener (2007). Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?. EMBO Rep. 8 (12): 1107-1109. PMC 2267227.

nrc.nl

nytimes.com

religioustolerance.org

sciencemag.org

  • Zie deze link naar het jubileumnummer van Science

talkorigins.org

teachernet.gov.uk

  • Teachernet, Document bank. Creationism teaching guidance. UK Department for Children, Schools and Families (18 september 2007). Geraadpleegd op 1 oktober 2007. "The intelligent design movement claims there are aspects of the natural world that are so intricate and fit for purpose that they cannot have evolved but must have been created by an 'intelligent designer'. Furthermore they assert that this claim is scientifically testable and should therefore be taught in science lessons. Intelligent design lies wholly outside of science. Sometimes examples are quoted that are said to require an 'intelligent designer'. However, many of these have subsequently been shown to have a scientific explanation, for example, the immune system and blood clotting mechanisms. Attempts to establish an idea of the 'specified complexity' needed for intelligent design are surrounded by complex mathematics. Despite this, the idea seems to be essentially a modern version of the old idea of the "God-of-the-gaps". Lack of a satisfactory scientific explanation of some phenomena (a 'gap' in scientific knowledge) is claimed to be evidence of an intelligent designer."

udel.edu

volkskrant.nl

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

wikisource.org

nl.wikisource.org