Bryan Caplan (Romanian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Bryan Caplan" in Romanian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Romanian rank
1st place
1st place
14th place
121st place
2nd place
3rd place
79th place
237th place
low place
low place
7th place
25th place
low place
low place
12th place
74th place
5th place
11th place
484th place
1,908th place
3,951st place
low place
3,837th place
6,007th place
1,544th place
2,040th place
3,237th place
1,785th place
low place
low place
453rd place
4,172nd place
low place
low place
1,029th place
3,648th place
92nd place
547th place
1,152nd place
9,171st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
254th place
282nd place
1,698th place
4,801st place
109th place
323rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place

80000hours.org

archive.today

baltimoresun.com

doi.org

  • Lomasky, Loren (iunie 2008). „Swing and a myth: a review of Caplan's The Myth of the Rational Voter”. Public Choice. 135 (3–4): 469–484. doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9273-7. 
  • Read, Rupert (). „Economist-kings? A Critical Notice on Caplan, The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies”. European Review. Cambridge University Press. 19 (1): 119–129. doi:10.1017/S1062798710000426. Caplan's The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies has been received by rave reviews. These reviews appear to have failed to note that Caplan's book celebrates the market and denigrates democracy at the very time when markets worldwide have failed and democracies have ridden to the rescue. It thus appears to have been undermined fatally by events that occurred as it was published (and which Caplan artfully omits to mention in the more recent paperback edition). Caplan's book in fact stands in the long tradition of anti-democratic writings that argue that an elite must rule. An elite of free-market economists. An elite no longer in good odour, since the financial crisis (and the climate crisis) occurred and became starkly evident to all. This Critical Notice also points out that numerous of Caplan's key claims, such as that individual voters have zero effect on election results, are empirically false. 
  • Hannon, Michael (noiembrie 2020). „Empathetic understanding and deliberative democracy”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 101 (3): 591–611 (600). doi:10.1111/phpr.12624. A useful heuristic is what Bryan Caplan (2011) calls the 'political turing test'. Caplan actually calls this the 'ideological turing test', but I prefer my label in the context of this paper. 

economist.com

freakonomics.com

  • „Bryan Caplan Archives”. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în . 
  • „The Economist's Guide to Parenting”. Arhivat din original la . Accesat în . 

gmu.edu

econfaculty.gmu.edu

huffingtonpost.com

independent.org

infoshop.org

kirkusreviews.com

libertarianpapers.org

mises.org

nationalreview.com

npr.org

nytimes.com

psychologytoday.com

realclearmarkets.com

spunk.org

substack.com

betonit.substack.com

theguardian.com

vox.com

washingtontimes.com

web.archive.org

worktribe.com

nottingham-repository.worktribe.com

worldcat.org

  • Galef, Julia (). „Could you pass an ideological Turing test?”. The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't. New York: Portfolio/Penguin. pp. 203–205 (204). ISBN 9780735217553. OCLC 1164823768. I treat the ideological Turing test as a kind of 'North Star', an ideal to guide my thinking ... I once saw someone talk about how important it is to be able to pass an ideological Turing test and then add, 'Of course, people often don't want to do this, because they're afraid they'll change their minds.' 
  • Kling, Arnold (). The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides (ed. 3rd). Washington, DC: Cato Institute. p. 66. ISBN 9781948647427. OCLC 1110724336. That characterization of progressives and conservatives would not pass an ideological Turing test. 

wsj.com

wsj.com

blogs.wsj.com