Gossen, Hermann Heinrich.Entwickelung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln : [нем.]. — Braunschweig, (Germany) : Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, 1854. — P. 231.Источник (неопр.). Дата обращения: 12 октября 2021. Архивировано 7 апреля 2022 года. «[…] nur durch Feststellung des Privateigenthums […] deren Lösung die Kräfte einzelner Menschen weit übersteigt.» («[…] only through the establishment of private property is to be found the measure for determining the quantity of each commodity which it would be best to produce under given conditions. Therefore, the central authority [that is] proposed by the communists for the distribution of the various tasks and their reward, would very soon find that it had undertaken a task the solution of which far exceeds the abilities of individual men.»)
Ebeling, Richard (1 September 1990). „The impossibility of socialism“Архивная копия от 28 октября 2021 на Wayback Machine. The Future of Freedom Foundation. Retrieved 17 August 2020. „The heart of Mises' argument against socialism is that central planning by the government destroys the essential tool — competitively formed market prices — by which people in a society make rational economic decisions. The socialist planner, therefore, is left trying to steer the collectivist economy blindfolded. He cannot know what products to produce, the relative quantities to produce, and the most economically appropriate way to produce them with the resources and labor at his central command. This leads to 'planned chaos' or to the 'planned anarchy' to which Pravda referred. […] Even if we ignore the fact that the rulers of socialist countries have cared very little for the welfare of their own subjects; even if we discount the lack of personal incentives in socialist economies; and even if we disregard the total lack of concern for the consumer under socialism; the basic problem remains the same: the most well-intentioned socialist planner just does not know what to do.“
Fonseca, Gonçalo L.The socialist calculation debate (неопр.). HET (2000s). — «The information here has not been reviewed independently for accuracy, relevance and/or balance and thus deserves a considerable amount of caution. As a result, I would prefer not to be cited as reliable authorities on anything. However, I do not mind being listed as a general internet resource.» Дата обращения: 3 апреля 2007. Архивировано из оригинала 18 февраля 2009 года.
Gossen, Hermann Heinrich.Entwickelung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln : [нем.]. — Braunschweig, (Germany) : Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, 1854. — P. 231.Источник (неопр.). Дата обращения: 12 октября 2021. Архивировано 7 апреля 2022 года. «[…] nur durch Feststellung des Privateigenthums […] deren Lösung die Kräfte einzelner Menschen weit übersteigt.» («[…] only through the establishment of private property is to be found the measure for determining the quantity of each commodity which it would be best to produce under given conditions. Therefore, the central authority [that is] proposed by the communists for the distribution of the various tasks and their reward, would very soon find that it had undertaken a task the solution of which far exceeds the abilities of individual men.»)
Fonseca, Gonçalo L.The socialist calculation debate (неопр.). HET (2000s). — «The information here has not been reviewed independently for accuracy, relevance and/or balance and thus deserves a considerable amount of caution. As a result, I would prefer not to be cited as reliable authorities on anything. However, I do not mind being listed as a general internet resource.» Дата обращения: 3 апреля 2007. Архивировано из оригинала 18 февраля 2009 года.
Ebeling, Richard (1 September 1990). „The impossibility of socialism“Архивная копия от 28 октября 2021 на Wayback Machine. The Future of Freedom Foundation. Retrieved 17 August 2020. „The heart of Mises' argument against socialism is that central planning by the government destroys the essential tool — competitively formed market prices — by which people in a society make rational economic decisions. The socialist planner, therefore, is left trying to steer the collectivist economy blindfolded. He cannot know what products to produce, the relative quantities to produce, and the most economically appropriate way to produce them with the resources and labor at his central command. This leads to 'planned chaos' or to the 'planned anarchy' to which Pravda referred. […] Even if we ignore the fact that the rulers of socialist countries have cared very little for the welfare of their own subjects; even if we discount the lack of personal incentives in socialist economies; and even if we disregard the total lack of concern for the consumer under socialism; the basic problem remains the same: the most well-intentioned socialist planner just does not know what to do.“
