Condorcet method (Simple English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Condorcet method" in Simple English language version.

Last modified: 23:42:35, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Ref.Un. Ref.Website

Global rank Simple English rank

65doi.org

2^nd place

64worldcat.org

4^th place

6^th place

54semanticscholar.org

15^th place

11^th place

21books.google.com

3^rd place

4^th place

21cmu.edu

2,125^th place

1,513^th place

21jstor.org

23^rd place

32^nd place

11psu.edu

299^th place

419^th place

11uni-augsburg.de

low place

5,814^th place

11researchgate.net

96^th place

135^th place

11natlib.govt.nz

785^th place

3,591^st place

11archive.org

6^th place

3^rd place

11ox.ac.uk

541^st place

458^th place

11meta.wikimedia.org

2,774^th place

417^th place

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Simple English: 3^rd place)

Nanson, E. J. (1882). "Methods of election". Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 19: 207–208. although Ware's method cannot return the worst, it may return the next worst.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Simple English: 4^th place)

Mackie, Gerry. (2003). Democracy defended. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 6. ISBN 0511062648. OCLC 252507400.

cmu.edu (Global: 2,125^th place; Simple English: 1,513^th place)

cs.cmu.edu

Young, H. P. (1988). "Condorcet's Theory of Voting" (PDF). American Political Science Review. 82 (4): 1231–1244. doi:10.2307/1961757. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 1961757. S2CID 14908863.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Simple English: 2^nd place)

Pivato, Marcus (2015-08-01). "Condorcet meets Bentham". Journal of Mathematical Economics. 59: 58–65. doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.04.006. Indeed, it is easy to construct examples where the Condorcet winner does not maximize social welfare [...however...] in a large population satisfying certain statistical regularities, not only is the Condorcet winner almost guaranteed to exist, but it is almost guaranteed to also be the utilitarian social choice.
Lehtinen, Aki (2007-08-01). "The Welfare Consequences of Strategic Voting in Two Commonly Used Parliamentary Agendas". Theory and Decision. 63 (1): 1–40. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.727.3928. doi:10.1007/s11238-007-9028-4. ISSN 0040-5833. S2CID 153595828. If the CW is not the same alternative as the utilitarian winner (UW), the latter ought to be selected according to the utilitarian welfare criterion {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |citeseerx= (help)
Colomer, Josep (2013). "Ramon Llull: From Ars Electionis to Social Choice Theory". Social Choice and Welfare. 40 (2): 317–328. doi:10.1007/s00355-011-0598-2. S2CID 43015882.
Nurmi, Hannu (2012), "On the Relevance of Theoretical Results to Voting System Choice", in Felsenthal, Dan S.; Machover, Moshé (eds.), Electoral Systems, Studies in Choice and Welfare, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 255–274, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_10, ISBN 9783642204401, S2CID 12562825
Young, H. P. (1988). "Condorcet's Theory of Voting" (PDF). American Political Science Review. 82 (4): 1231–1244. doi:10.2307/1961757. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 1961757. S2CID 14908863.

jstor.org (Global: 23^rd place; Simple English: 32^nd place)

Young, H. P. (1988). "Condorcet's Theory of Voting" (PDF). American Political Science Review. 82 (4): 1231–1244. doi:10.2307/1961757. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 1961757. S2CID 14908863.

meta.wikimedia.org (Global: 2,774^th place; Simple English: 417^th place)

"Wikimedia Foundation elections 2013/Results – Meta". meta.wikimedia.org. Retrieved 2017-01-23.

natlib.govt.nz (Global: 785^th place; Simple English: 3,591^st place)

rsnz.natlib.govt.nz

Hogben, G. (1913). "Preferential Voting in Single-member Constituencies, with Special Reference to the Counting of Votes". Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 46: 304–308.

ox.ac.uk (Global: 541^st place; Simple English: 458^th place)

nuff.ox.ac.uk

McLean (2002), Australian electoral reform and two concepts of representation (PDF) (paper), UK: Ox, retrieved 2015-06-27

psu.edu (Global: 299^th place; Simple English: 419^th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

Lehtinen, Aki (2007-08-01). "The Welfare Consequences of Strategic Voting in Two Commonly Used Parliamentary Agendas". Theory and Decision. 63 (1): 1–40. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.727.3928. doi:10.1007/s11238-007-9028-4. ISSN 0040-5833. S2CID 153595828. If the CW is not the same alternative as the utilitarian winner (UW), the latter ought to be selected according to the utilitarian welfare criterion {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |citeseerx= (help)

researchgate.net (Global: 96^th place; Simple English: 135^th place)

Colomer, Josep (2013). "Ramon Llull: From Ars Electionis to Social Choice Theory". Social Choice and Welfare. 40 (2): 317–328. doi:10.1007/s00355-011-0598-2. S2CID 43015882.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; Simple English: 11^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

Lehtinen, Aki (2007-08-01). "The Welfare Consequences of Strategic Voting in Two Commonly Used Parliamentary Agendas". Theory and Decision. 63 (1): 1–40. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.727.3928. doi:10.1007/s11238-007-9028-4. ISSN 0040-5833. S2CID 153595828. If the CW is not the same alternative as the utilitarian winner (UW), the latter ought to be selected according to the utilitarian welfare criterion {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |citeseerx= (help)
Colomer, Josep (2013). "Ramon Llull: From Ars Electionis to Social Choice Theory". Social Choice and Welfare. 40 (2): 317–328. doi:10.1007/s00355-011-0598-2. S2CID 43015882.
Nurmi, Hannu (2012), "On the Relevance of Theoretical Results to Voting System Choice", in Felsenthal, Dan S.; Machover, Moshé (eds.), Electoral Systems, Studies in Choice and Welfare, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 255–274, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_10, ISBN 9783642204401, S2CID 12562825
Young, H. P. (1988). "Condorcet's Theory of Voting" (PDF). American Political Science Review. 82 (4): 1231–1244. doi:10.2307/1961757. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 1961757. S2CID 14908863.

uni-augsburg.de (Global: low place; Simple English: 5,814^th place)

math.uni-augsburg.de

G. Hägele and F. Pukelsheim (2001). "Llull's writings on electoral systems". Studia Lulliana. 41: 3–38.

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; Simple English: 6^th place)

search.worldcat.org

Lehtinen, Aki (2007-08-01). "The Welfare Consequences of Strategic Voting in Two Commonly Used Parliamentary Agendas". Theory and Decision. 63 (1): 1–40. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.727.3928. doi:10.1007/s11238-007-9028-4. ISSN 0040-5833. S2CID 153595828. If the CW is not the same alternative as the utilitarian winner (UW), the latter ought to be selected according to the utilitarian welfare criterion {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |citeseerx= (help)
Gehrlein, William V. (2011). Voting paradoxes and group coherence : the condorcet efficiency of voting rules. Lepelley, Dominique. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 9783642031076. OCLC 695387286. empirical studies ... indicate that some of the most common paradoxes are relatively unlikely to be observed in actual elections. ... it is easily concluded that Condorcet's Paradox should very rarely be observed in any real elections on a small number of candidates with large electorates, as long as voters' preferences reflect any reasonable degree of group mutual coherence
Mackie, Gerry. (2003). Democracy defended. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 6. ISBN 0511062648. OCLC 252507400.
Young, H. P. (1988). "Condorcet's Theory of Voting" (PDF). American Political Science Review. 82 (4): 1231–1244. doi:10.2307/1961757. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 1961757. S2CID 14908863.

Condorcet method (Simple English Wikipedia)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Simple English: 3rd place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Simple English: 4th place)

cmu.edu (Global: 2,125th place; Simple English: 1,513th place)

cs.cmu.edu

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Simple English: 2nd place)

jstor.org (Global: 23rd place; Simple English: 32nd place)

meta.wikimedia.org (Global: 2,774th place; Simple English: 417th place)

natlib.govt.nz (Global: 785th place; Simple English: 3,591st place)