Homo floresiensis (Simple English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Homo floresiensis" in Simple English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Simple English rank
234th place
139th place
1st place
1st place
low place
3,095th place
20th place
17th place
18th place
14th place
2nd place
3rd place
4th place
6th place
11th place
9th place
412th place
445th place
503rd place
209th place
197th place
52nd place
1,993rd place
709th place
857th place
242nd place
774th place
232nd place
3,087th place
1,071st place
12th place
11th place
149th place
113th place
222nd place
243rd place
30th place
28th place
1,933rd place
1,317th place

bbc.com

doi.org

excite.com

apnews.excite.com

guardian.co.uk

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

nature.com

  • Brown P. et al 2004. A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431 (7012): 1055–1061. [1]
  • Morwood M.J. et al 2005. Further evidence for small-bodied hominins from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 437 (7061): 1012–1017. [2]
  • Morwood M.J. et al 2004. Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia. Nature 431 (7012): 1087–1091. [3]
  • Nature 2004. Little lady of Flores forces rethink of human evolution. Nature 431 (7012): 1029. [4]
  • Sutikna, Thomas; Tocheri, Matthew W.; et al. (30 March 2016). "Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Indonesia". Nature. 532 (7599): 366–369. Bibcode:2016Natur.532..366S. doi:10.1038/nature17179. PMID 27027286. S2CID 4469009. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
  • Dalton, Rex 2004. Little lady of Flores forces rethink of human evolution. Nature 431 (7012): 1029. [12]

newscientist.com

  • New Scientist, September 20, 2007. 'Hobbitt' wrist bones suggest a distinct species. [7]

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

royalsocietypublishing.org

rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org

  • Obendorf P.J; Oxnard C.E. & Kefford C.E. 2008. Are the small human-like fossils found on Flores human endemic cretins?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B Biological Sciences. 275 (1640): 1287–1296. [5]

sciencedirect.com

  • Argue, Debbie et al 2009. Homo floresiensis: a cladistic analysis. Journal of Human Evolution. [9]

sciencemag.org

  • Tocheri M.W et al 2007. The primitive wrist of Homo floresiensis and its implications for hominin evolution. Science 317 (5845): 1743. [6]

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

smithsonianmag.com

telegraph.co.uk

theage.com.au

theguardian.com

  • Guardian, September 21, 2007. Yes, it's a Hobbit. The debate that has divided science is solved at last (sort of). [8]

ucsd.edu

cogsci-online.ucsd.edu

uiuc.edu

netfiles.uiuc.edu

web.archive.org

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

  • Forth G. 2005. Hominids, hairy hominoids and the science of humanity. Anthropology Today 21 (3): 13–17. [10]