„The Andrew Marr Show Interview: Theresa May, MP Home Secretary”(PDF). BBC. 23. 11. 2014. Приступљено 6. 12. 2014. „Well I guess what he’s talking about is the fact that for certain aspects and certain of the more intrusive measures that our security service and police have available to them – i.e. Intercept, intercepting people’s telephones and some other intrusive measures – the decision is taken by the Secretary of State, predominantly me. A significant part of my job is looking at these warrants and signing these warrants. I think it’s ... Some people argue that should be to judges....I think it’s very important that actually those decisions are being taken by somebody who is democratically accountable to the public. I think that’s an important part of our system. I think it’s a strength of our system.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
The first use of the term "electronic police state" was likely in a posting by Jim Davis „Police Checkpoints on the Information Highway”. Computer Underground Digest. 6 (72). 11. 8. 1994. ISSN1066-632X. „The so-called 'electronic frontier' is quickly turning into an electronic police state.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
daqc.co.uk
David Anderson (11. 4. 2017). „CJEU judgment in Watson/Tele2”. David Anderson QC Lawyer London UK. Приступљено 2017-07-06.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
"FP7 Security Research", Community Research and Development Information Service (CORDIS), European Commission, 3 September 2012. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
HIDE - "HOMELAND SECURITY, BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION AND PERSONAL DETECTION ETHICS", Community Research and Development Information Service, http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/88614_en.html. Retrieved 17 July 2016
„Data retention across the EU”. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (на језику: енглески). 16. 12. 2015. Приступљено 2018-04-29.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
„List of judgments”. Investigatory Powers Tribunal. 5. 12. 2014. Архивирано из оригинала 6. 2. 2015. г. Приступљено 7. 2. 2015. „1. A declaration that the regime governing the soliciting, receiving, storing and transmitting by UK authorities of private communications of individuals located in the UK which have been obtained by US authorities pursuant to Prism and/or Upstream does not contravene Articles 8 or 10 ECHR. 2. A declaration that the regime in respect of interception under ss8(4), 15 and 16 of the Regulation of investigatory Powers Act 2000 does not contravene Articles 8 or 10 ECHR and does not give rise to unlawful discrimination contrary to Article 14, read together with Articles 8 and/or 10 of the ECHR.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
TATLOW, DIDI KIRSTEN (28. 6. 2013), U.S. Prism, Meet China's Golden Shield, „[...] a Beijing lawyer named Xie Yanyi filed a public information request with the police asking about China's own surveillance operations. [...] 'Most people were critical about the U.S. and supported Snowden.' [he said...] Then the discussion started shifting to take in China's own surveillance issues.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
Sjögren, Per-Anders. „Alliansen enig om stora ändringar i FRA-lag” (на језику: Swedish). Riksdag & Departement. Архивирано из оригинала 10. 3. 2014. г. Приступљено 10. 3. 2014.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)CS1 одржавање: Непрепознат језик (веза)
Mordini E. (2008), Nothing to Hide. Biometrics, Privacy and Private Sphere, in Schouten B. et al. (eds.): BIOID 2008, Biometrics and Identity Management, LNCS 5372, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 247–257. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-89991-4_27. Retrieved July, 17; 2016.
Data Priest; William M. Arkin (20. 12. 2010). „Monitoring America”. Washington Post. Архивирано из оригинала 10. 01. 2014. г. Приступљено 27. 1. 2011.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
Sjögren, Per-Anders. „Alliansen enig om stora ändringar i FRA-lag” (на језику: Swedish). Riksdag & Departement. Архивирано из оригинала 10. 3. 2014. г. Приступљено 10. 3. 2014.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)CS1 одржавање: Непрепознат језик (веза)
„List of judgments”. Investigatory Powers Tribunal. 5. 12. 2014. Архивирано из оригинала 6. 2. 2015. г. Приступљено 7. 2. 2015. „1. A declaration that the regime governing the soliciting, receiving, storing and transmitting by UK authorities of private communications of individuals located in the UK which have been obtained by US authorities pursuant to Prism and/or Upstream does not contravene Articles 8 or 10 ECHR. 2. A declaration that the regime in respect of interception under ss8(4), 15 and 16 of the Regulation of investigatory Powers Act 2000 does not contravene Articles 8 or 10 ECHR and does not give rise to unlawful discrimination contrary to Article 14, read together with Articles 8 and/or 10 of the ECHR.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
Data Priest; William M. Arkin (20. 12. 2010). „Monitoring America”. Washington Post. Архивирано из оригинала 10. 01. 2014. г. Приступљено 27. 1. 2011.CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
The first use of the term "electronic police state" was likely in a posting by Jim Davis „Police Checkpoints on the Information Highway”. Computer Underground Digest. 6 (72). 11. 8. 1994. ISSN1066-632X. „The so-called 'electronic frontier' is quickly turning into an electronic police state.”CS1 одржавање: Формат датума (веза)
