Solove, Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff Between Privacy and Security, p. 1. «If you've got nothing to hide, you shouldn't worry about government surveillance.»
OECD, "Appendix II: Can We Be Persuaded to Become Pet-Lovers?» p. 323.
OECD, "Appendix II: Can We Be Persuaded to Become Pet-Lovers?» p. 326. «The self-employed males, by contrast, who operated as brokers in networks; might sometimes begin with the „nothing to hide“ frame, in which they would claim that no one with anything to hide need be concerned about privacy at all, but quickly shifted to the „inconvenience“ frame, in which data collection and sharing was seen more as a nuisance than as a threat.»
Solove, Daniel J. «Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have 'Nothing to Hide'.» The Chronicle of Higher Education. May 15, 2011. Retrieved on June 25, 2013. «The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. The data security expert Bruce Schneier calls it the „most common retort against privacy advocates.“ The legal scholar Geoffrey Stone refers to it as an „all-too-common refrain.“ In its most compelling form, it is an argument that the privacy interest is generally minimal, thus making the contest with security concerns a foreordained victory for security.»
