Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

基數投票制 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "基數投票制" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
17web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
4doi.org
2nd place
23rd place
4electowiki.org
low place
low place
3worldcat.org
5th place
12th place
3rangevoting.org
low place
low place
2ssrn.com
703rd place
1,016th place
1archives-ouvertes.fr
1,031st place
3,432nd place
1researchgate.net
120th place
337th place
1uni-muenchen.de
3,337th place
9,871st place
1archive.org
6th place
4th place
1socialchoiceandbeyond.com
low place
low place
1electology.org
low place
low place
1voteupapp.com
low place
low place
1scorevoting.net
low place
low place
1nih.gov
4th place
5th place
1github.com
383rd place
336th place
1equal.vote
low place
low place
1registerguard.com
9,684th place
low place
1ivn.us
low place
low place
1medium.com
551st place
572nd place

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Chinese: 4th place)

archives-ouvertes.fr (Global: 1,031st place; Chinese: 3,432nd place)

halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr

  • Baujard, Antoinette; Gavrel, Frédéric; Igersheim, Herrade; Laslier, Jean-François; Lebon, Isabelle. How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting (PDF). European Journal of Political Economy. 2017-09, 55: 14–28 [2021-09-04]. ISSN 0176-2680. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.006. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2022-05-12） （英语）. A key feature of evaluative voting is a form of independence: the voter can evaluate all the candidates in turn . . . another feature of evaluative voting . . . is that voters can express some degree of preference. 

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Chinese: 23rd place)

electology.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

  • Score Voting. The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-21 [2016-12-10]. （原始内容存档于2019-01-25） （英语）. Simplified forms of score voting automatically give skipped candidates the lowest possible score for the ballot they were skipped. Other forms have those ballots not affect the candidate’s rating at all. Those forms not affecting the candidates rating frequently make use of quotas. Quotas demand a minimum proportion of voters rate that candidate in some way before that candidate is eligible to win. 

electowiki.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

equal.vote (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

github.com (Global: 383rd place; Chinese: 336th place)

ivn.us (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

medium.com (Global: 551st place; Chinese: 572nd place)

nih.gov (Global: 4th place; Chinese: 5th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

rangevoting.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

registerguard.com (Global: 9,684th place; Chinese: low place)

researchgate.net (Global: 120th place; Chinese: 337th place)

scorevoting.net (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

  • Smith, Warren D. Range voting (PDF). 2000-12 [2021-09-04]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2018-08-20） （英语）. The “range voting” system is as follows. In a c-candidate election, you select a vector of c real numbers, each of absolute value ≤1, as your vote. E.g. you could vote (+1, −1, +.3, −.9, +1) in a five-candidate election. The vote-vectors are summed to get a c-vector x and the winner is the i such that xi is maximum. 

socialchoiceandbeyond.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

  • Range Voting. Social Choice and Beyond. [2016-12-10]. （原始内容存档于2016-08-25） （英语）. with the winner being the one with the largest point total. Or, alternatively, the average may be computed and the one with the highest average wins 

ssrn.com (Global: 703rd place; Chinese: 1,016th place)

  • Vasiljev, Sergei. Cardinal voting: The way to escape the social choice impossibility. 2008-04. SSRN 1116545 可免费查阅 （英语）. 
  • Hillinger, Claude. On the possibility of democracy and rational collective choice. Rochester, NY. 2004-10-01. SSRN 608821 可免费查阅 （英语）. I favor 'evaluative voting' under which a voter can vote for or against any alternative, or abstain. 

uni-muenchen.de (Global: 3,337th place; Chinese: 9,871st place)

epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de

  • Hillinger, Claude. The case for utilitarian voting. Open Access LMU. 2005-05-01 [2018-05-15]. （原始内容存档于2020-04-25） （英语）. Specific UV rules that have been proposed are approval voting, allowing the scores 0, 1; range voting, allowing all numbers in an interval as scores; evaluative voting, allowing the scores −1, 0, 1. 

voteupapp.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

  • Baujard, Antoinette; Gavrel, Frédéric; Igersheim, Herrade; Laslier, Jean-François; Lebon, Isabelle. How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting (PDF). European Journal of Political Economy. 2017-09, 55: 14–28 [2021-09-04]. ISSN 0176-2680. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.006. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2022-05-12） （英语）. A key feature of evaluative voting is a form of independence: the voter can evaluate all the candidates in turn . . . another feature of evaluative voting . . . is that voters can express some degree of preference. 
  • Cardinal voting systems. Electowiki. [2017-01-31]. （原始内容存档于2022-02-22） （英语）. 
  • Voting system. Electowiki. [2017-01-31]. （原始内容存档于2021-12-19） （英语）. 
  • Hillinger, Claude. The case for utilitarian voting. Open Access LMU. 2005-05-01 [2018-05-15]. （原始内容存档于2020-04-25） （英语）. Specific UV rules that have been proposed are approval voting, allowing the scores 0, 1; range voting, allowing all numbers in an interval as scores; evaluative voting, allowing the scores −1, 0, 1. 
  • Range Voting. Social Choice and Beyond. [2016-12-10]. （原始内容存档于2016-08-25） （英语）. with the winner being the one with the largest point total. Or, alternatively, the average may be computed and the one with the highest average wins 
  • Score Voting. The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-21 [2016-12-10]. （原始内容存档于2019-01-25） （英语）. Simplified forms of score voting automatically give skipped candidates the lowest possible score for the ballot they were skipped. Other forms have those ballots not affect the candidate’s rating at all. Those forms not affecting the candidates rating frequently make use of quotas. Quotas demand a minimum proportion of voters rate that candidate in some way before that candidate is eligible to win. 
  • Should you be using a more expressive voting system?. VoteUp. [2018-05-15]. （原始内容存档于2017-09-09） （英语）. Score Voting—it's just like range voting except the scores are discrete instead of spanning a continuous range. 
  • Rating scale research. RangeVoting.org. [2018-05-15]. （原始内容存档于2019-05-07） （英语）. The present page seems to conclude 0-9 is the best scale. 
  • Good criteria support range voting. RangeVoting.org. [2018-05-15]. （原始内容存档于2018-05-16） （英语）. Definition 1: For us "Range voting" shall mean the following voting method. Each voter provides as her vote, a set of real number scores, each in [0,1], one for each candidate. The candidate with greatest score-sum, is elected. 
  • Smith, Warren D. Range voting (PDF). 2000-12 [2021-09-04]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2018-08-20） （英语）. The “range voting” system is as follows. In a c-candidate election, you select a vector of c real numbers, each of absolute value ≤1, as your vote. E.g. you could vote (+1, −1, +.3, −.9, +1) in a five-candidate election. The vote-vectors are summed to get a c-vector x and the winner is the i such that xi is maximum. 
  • STAR Voting. Equal Vote Coalition. [2018-07-14]. （原始内容存档于2020-07-01） （英语）. 
  • STAR voting an intriguing innovation. The Register Guard. [2018-07-14]. （原始内容存档于2018-08-06） （英语）. 
  • Are we witnessing the cutting edge of voting reform?. Independent voter news. 2018-02-01 [2018-07-14]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-10） （美国英语）. 
  • Majority approval voting. Electowiki. [2018-08-26]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-20） （英语）. 
  • 3-2-1 voting. Electowiki. [2021-09-04]. （原始内容存档于2022-04-16） （英语）. 
  • Quinn, Jameson. Make. All. Votes. Count. (Part II: Single-winner). Jameson Quinn. 2017-05-28 [2018-07-14]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-10） （英语）. 
  • Reweighted range voting – A PR voting method that feels like range voting. RangeVoting.org. [2018-03-24]. （原始内容存档于2019-06-18） （英语）. 

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Chinese: 12th place)

  • Baujard, Antoinette; Gavrel, Frédéric; Igersheim, Herrade; Laslier, Jean-François; Lebon, Isabelle. How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting (PDF). European Journal of Political Economy. 2017-09, 55: 14–28 [2021-09-04]. ISSN 0176-2680. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.006. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2022-05-12） （英语）. A key feature of evaluative voting is a form of independence: the voter can evaluate all the candidates in turn . . . another feature of evaluative voting . . . is that voters can express some degree of preference. 
  • Riker, William Harrison. Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. Waveland Pr. 1982: 29–30. ISBN 0881333670. OCLC 316034736 （英语）. Ordinal utility is a measure of preferences in terms of rank orders—that is, first, second, etc. . . . Cardinal utility is a measure of preferences on a scale of cardinal numbers, such as the scale from zero to one or the scale from one to ten. 
  • Felsenthal, Dan S. On combining approval with disapproval voting. Behavioral Science. 1989-01, 34 (1): 53–60. ISSN 0005-7940. doi:10.1002/bs.3830340105 （英语）. under CAV he has three options—cast one vote in favor, abstain, or cast one vote against.