羅訴韋德案 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "羅訴韋德案" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

9web.archive.org

1^st place

5archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

3worldcat.org

5^th place

12^th place

2washingtonpost.com

34^th place

129^th place

1cnn.com

28^th place

71^st place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

8^th place

1casetext.com

4,010^th place

low place

1guttmacher.org

9,659^th place

6,503^rd place

1cnbc.com

220^th place

426^th place

1supremecourt.gov

3,811^th place

7,287^th place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

526^th place

1unc.edu

1,538^th place

1,766^th place

archive.org

Chemerinsky (2019)，§ 10.3.3.1, 第887页. Chemerinsky, Erwin. Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies [宪法：原则与策略] 6th. New York: Wolters Kluwer. 2019. ISBN 978-1-4548-9574-9 （英语）.
Chemerinsky (2019)，§ 10.3.3.1, 第886页: "Few decisions in Supreme Court history have provoked the intense controversy that has surrounded the abortion rulings. [在最高法院史上，少有堕胎相关判决能引起如此激烈的争论。]" Chemerinsky, Erwin. Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies [宪法：原则与策略] 6th. New York: Wolters Kluwer. 2019. ISBN 978-1-4548-9574-9 （英语）.
Dworkin, Roger. Limits: The Role of the Law in Bioethical Decision Making [极限：法律在生物伦理问题决策中的作用]. Indiana University Press. 1996: 28–36. ISBN 978-0253330758.
Chemerinsky (2019)，§ 10.3.3.1, 第892–893页. Chemerinsky, Erwin. Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies [宪法：原则与策略] 6th. New York: Wolters Kluwer. 2019. ISBN 978-1-4548-9574-9 （英语）.
Chemerinsky (2019)，§ 10.3.3.1, 第892–895页. Chemerinsky, Erwin. Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies [宪法：原则与策略] 6th. New York: Wolters Kluwer. 2019. ISBN 978-1-4548-9574-9 （英语）.

books.google.com

Greenhouse 2005，第72頁 Greenhouse, Linda. Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun's Supreme Court Journey. New York: Times Books. 2005. ISBN 978-0-8050-7791-9 （英语）.

casetext.com

Roe v. Wade, 314 F. Supp. 1217 (N.D. Tex. 1970). casetext. 1970-06-17 [2022-06-15]. （原始内容存档于2022-07-03）.

cnbc.com

Breuninger, Dan Mangan,Kevin. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending 50 years of federal abortion rights [最高法院推翻罗诉韦德案，结束持续50年的联邦堕胎权]. CNBC. 2022-06-24 [2022-06-25]. （原始内容存档于2022-06-24）.

cnn.com

Mears, William; Franken, Bob. 30 years after ruling, ambiguity, anxiety surround abortion debate. CNN. 2003-01-22 [2022-06-25]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-14）. In all, the Roe and Doe rulings impacted laws in 46 states. [总的来说，“Roe”和“Doe”的判决影响了46个州的法律。]

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

Jane ROE, et al., Appellants, v. Henry WADE.. LII / Legal Information Institute. [2022-07-15]. （原始内容存档于2013-12-07）（英语）.

guttmacher.org

Leaked Draft of US Supreme Court Opinion Would Overturn Roe v. Wade Outright. Guttmacher Institute. 2022-05-03 [2022-07-14]. （原始内容存档于2022-11-21）（英语）.

supremecourt.gov

19-1392 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (06/24/2022) (PDF). [2022-06-24]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2022-06-24）.

unc.edu

scholarship.law.unc.edu

Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. Wade. [2022-07-15]. （原始内容存档于2022-10-13）.

washingtonpost.com

The remarkable story of Henry Wade, abortion case’s namesake. Washington Post. [2022-06-26]. ISSN 0190-8286. （原始内容存档于2022-08-12）（美国英语）.
What Ruth Bader Ginsburg really said about Roe v. Wade. [2022-07-15]. （原始内容存档于2022-08-12）.

web.archive.org

Mears, William; Franken, Bob. 30 years after ruling, ambiguity, anxiety surround abortion debate. CNN. 2003-01-22 [2022-06-25]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-14）. In all, the Roe and Doe rulings impacted laws in 46 states. [总的来说，“Roe”和“Doe”的判决影响了46个州的法律。]
Roe v. Wade, 314 F. Supp. 1217 (N.D. Tex. 1970). casetext. 1970-06-17 [2022-06-15]. （原始内容存档于2022-07-03）.
The remarkable story of Henry Wade, abortion case’s namesake. Washington Post. [2022-06-26]. ISSN 0190-8286. （原始内容存档于2022-08-12）（美国英语）.
Leaked Draft of US Supreme Court Opinion Would Overturn Roe v. Wade Outright. Guttmacher Institute. 2022-05-03 [2022-07-14]. （原始内容存档于2022-11-21）（英语）.
Breuninger, Dan Mangan,Kevin. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending 50 years of federal abortion rights [最高法院推翻罗诉韦德案，结束持续50年的联邦堕胎权]. CNBC. 2022-06-24 [2022-06-25]. （原始内容存档于2022-06-24）.
19-1392 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (06/24/2022) (PDF). [2022-06-24]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2022-06-24）.
Jane ROE, et al., Appellants, v. Henry WADE.. LII / Legal Information Institute. [2022-07-15]. （原始内容存档于2013-12-07）（英语）.
What Ruth Bader Ginsburg really said about Roe v. Wade. [2022-07-15]. （原始内容存档于2022-08-12）.
Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. Wade. [2022-07-15]. （原始内容存档于2022-10-13）.

worldcat.org

The remarkable story of Henry Wade, abortion case’s namesake. Washington Post. [2022-06-26]. ISSN 0190-8286. （原始内容存档于2022-08-12）（美国英语）.
Nowak & Rotunda (2012)，§ 18.29(a)(i). Nowak, John E.; Rotunda, Ronald D. Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure 5th. Eagan, Minnesota: West Thomson/Reuters. 2012. OCLC 798148265 （英语）.
Nowak & Rotunda (2012)，§ 18.29(b)(i). Nowak, John E.; Rotunda, Ronald D. Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure 5th. Eagan, Minnesota: West Thomson/Reuters. 2012. OCLC 798148265 （英语）.