Best sources in Bislama Wikipedia PR-model

AR-model | F-model | PR-model
#WebsiteScore in June 20201m changes
1census.gov62,400-8,100
2worldstatesmen.org13,000-9,100
3ssb.no12,700+2,500
4inegi.org.mx10,000-27,700
5csb.gov.lv7,700-13,500
6etymonline.com7,200-3,300
7biblehub.com5,650-650
8oed.com5,650-650
9stat.gov.pl5,550-550
10bankier.pl5,550-550
11pentecostisland.net5,500-400
12bislama.org5,500-400
13bbc.co.uk4,800-1,500
14anu.edu.au2,300+200
15bnf.fr1,550-2,200
16books.google.com1,350-1,800
17shukanbunshun.com1,200-2,100
18parliament.uk1,100-1,000
19wga.hu1,050+500
20britannica.com1,050+500
21nytimes.com1,050-1,450
22youtube.com1,000-1,300
23imdb.com866-1,300
24unicef.org800-1,100
25clarin.com7000
26allmusic.com600-1,300
27warholfoundation.org500-1,100
28nobelprize.org500-400
29allmovie.com250-450
30film-book.com2500
31fiba.com250-450
32enciclopedia.cat200-300
33news.google.com200-550
34discoverfrance.net200-1,000
35blackpast.org150-400
36ctv.by1500
37pravoslavye.org.ua133-633
38teara.govt.nz100-400
39narod.ru1000
40archive.org75-125
41digitalspy.com50-300
42denofgeek.com50-300
43bettembourg.lu50-250
44terra.com.br50-100
45canalteatro.com.br50-100
46latimes.com50-300
47gettyimages.in50-300
48sfgate.com50-300
49rai.it33-200
50gossip.it33-200
51iltempo.it330
52messaggerosantantonio.it330
53crawleyscastingcalls.com25-75
54objectif-cinema.com25-75
55fright.com25-75

Scientific publications with DOI number

#WebsiteScore in June 20201m changes

Popularity and reliability assessment of sources in references of Wikipedia in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps in July 2020. More details in the research "Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia". Values for PR-score and AR-score were additinaly increased 100 times (to distinguish smaller values in the ranking).

Useful links: