The Strong No Show Paradoxes are a common flaw in Condorcet voting correspondences

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work The Strong No Show Paradoxes are a common flaw in Condorcet voting correspondences was on the 682,178th place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 781,938th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "The Strong No Show Paradoxes are a common flaw in Condorcet voting correspondences" is the 527,131st most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
682,178th place
1,606
+393
AR-score:
527,131st place
426
0
F-score:
781,938th place
1
0

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
577,240th place
1,606
+393
AR-score:
431,286th place
426
0
F-score:
508,188th place
1
0

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...