Double-fertilization, from myths to reality

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work Double-fertilization, from myths to reality was on the 29,257th place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 91,274th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "Double-fertilization, from myths to reality" is the 142,427th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
29,257th place
77,111
+3,111
AR-score:
142,427th place
1,836
+5
F-score:
91,274th place
8
0

Vietnamese Wikipedia (vi)

PR-score:
25th place
60,800
+7,600
AR-score:
11,141st place
100
0
F-score:
28,571st place
1
0

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
229,805th place
10,100
-4,705
AR-score:
298,469th place
695
+5
F-score:
578,484th place
1
0

Chinese Wikipedia (zh)

PR-score:
15,842nd place
2,946
-238
AR-score:
14,041st place
215
0
F-score:
33,559th place
1
0

Arabic Wikipedia (ar)

PR-score:
12,226th place
1,221
+469
AR-score:
54,009th place
52
0
F-score:
63,739th place
1
0

Bosnian Wikipedia (bs)

PR-score:
481st place
993
+18
AR-score:
5,216th place
18
0
F-score:
5,810th place
1
0

Tamil Wikipedia (ta)

PR-score:
447th place
770
-133
AR-score:
211th place
654
0
F-score:
977th place
2
0

Norwegian Wikipedia (no)

PR-score:
2,323rd place
280
+100
AR-score:
3,324th place
100
0
F-score:
4,346th place
1
0

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...