SARS-Coronavirus ancestor’s foot-prints in South-East Asian bat colonies and the refuge theory

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work SARS-Coronavirus ancestor’s foot-prints in South-East Asian bat colonies and the refuge theory was on the 3,866th place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 20,290th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "SARS-Coronavirus ancestor’s foot-prints in South-East Asian bat colonies and the refuge theory" is the 89,228th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
3,866th place
256,308
-350,887
AR-score:
89,228th place
2,627
-155
F-score:
20,290th place
22
-1

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
6,610th place
140,227
-145,827
AR-score:
229,999th place
913
-25
F-score:
218,870th place
2
0

Spanish Wikipedia (es)

PR-score:
3,826th place
34,072
-56,533
AR-score:
16,905th place
436
+21
F-score:
25,332nd place
1
0

Japanese Wikipedia (ja)

PR-score:
2,876th place
24,762
-94,758
AR-score:
9,052nd place
382
+1
F-score:
22,055th place
1
0

Arabic Wikipedia (ar)

PR-score:
361st place
22,122
-538
AR-score:
37,409th place
98
+5
F-score:
11,863rd place
2
0

Vietnamese Wikipedia (vi)

PR-score:
554th place
11,374
-24,845
AR-score:
7,614th place
159
+8
F-score:
8,725th place
2
0

Swedish Wikipedia (sv)

PR-score:
376th place
7,262
-13,924
AR-score:
3,266th place
284
0
F-score:
6,192nd place
1
0

Azerbaijani Wikipedia (az)

PR-score:
42nd place
1,287
-1,023
AR-score:
790th place
39
+4
F-score:
1,591st place
1
0

Catalan Wikipedia (ca)

PR-score:
11,036th place
176
-918
AR-score:
20,452nd place
58
0
F-score:
35,834th place
1
0
Show all Wikipedia languages...

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...