Nutritional evaluation of some subtropical red and green seaweeds

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work Nutritional evaluation of some subtropical red and green seaweeds was on the 125,621st place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 86,788th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "Nutritional evaluation of some subtropical red and green seaweeds" is the 50,344th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
125,621st place
24,953
-4,465
AR-score:
50,344th place
3,923
+9
F-score:
86,788th place
9
0

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
123,847th place
19,439
-3,263
AR-score:
171,572nd place
1,201
+5
F-score:
202,923rd place
2
0

Chinese Wikipedia (zh)

PR-score:
16,700th place
2,736
-211
AR-score:
16,661st place
176
0
F-score:
24,475th place
1
0

Spanish Wikipedia (es)

PR-score:
42,398th place
1,125
-176
AR-score:
78,126th place
13
+3
F-score:
79,388th place
1
0

Esperanto Wikipedia (eo)

PR-score:
32nd place
950
+50
AR-score:
17th place
2,475
0
F-score:
436th place
2
0

Polish Wikipedia (pl)

PR-score:
27,849th place
396
-134
AR-score:
37,617th place
25
0
F-score:
39,911th place
1
0

Malay Wikipedia (ms)

PR-score:
3,146th place
158
-24
AR-score:
7,213th place
4
0
F-score:
5,282nd place
1
0

Ukrainian Wikipedia (uk)

PR-score:
12,467th place
146
-707
AR-score:
16,585th place
26
0
F-score:
25,748th place
1
0

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...