A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla was on the 31,060th place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 28,351st place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla" is the 8,738th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
31,060th place
74,103
-19,801
AR-score:
8,738th place
11,132
+67
F-score:
28,351st place
18
0

Dutch Wikipedia (nl)

PR-score:
136th place
47,900
-12,725
AR-score:
220th place
4,550
+50
F-score:
2,373rd place
1
0

Spanish Wikipedia (es)

PR-score:
10,502nd place
12,307
-4,196
AR-score:
6,087th place
1,277
0
F-score:
14,939th place
2
0

Vietnamese Wikipedia (vi)

PR-score:
2,161st place
3,766
-684
AR-score:
3,694th place
316
+16
F-score:
15,161st place
1
0

French Wikipedia (fr)

PR-score:
17,468th place
3,223
-1,142
AR-score:
10,268th place
781
0
F-score:
15,939th place
2
0

Japanese Wikipedia (ja)

PR-score:
26,190th place
1,896
+193
AR-score:
27,810th place
82
0
F-score:
14,029th place
2
0

Greek Wikipedia (el)

PR-score:
2,684th place
1,022
-200
AR-score:
72nd place
2,088
0
F-score:
6,163rd place
1
0

Indonesian Wikipedia (id)

PR-score:
11,009th place
300
0
AR-score:
492nd place
800
0
F-score:
12,257th place
1
0

Catalan Wikipedia (ca)

PR-score:
26,060th place
32
-23
AR-score:
22,160th place
50
0
F-score:
11,356th place
1
0

Asturian Wikipedia (ast)

PR-score:
7,758th place
0
-2
AR-score:
6,538th place
5
0
F-score:
6,916th place
1
0
Show all Wikipedia languages...

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...