Monotreme Cell-Cycles and the Evolution of Homeothermy

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work Monotreme Cell-Cycles and the Evolution of Homeothermy was on the 22,398th place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 30,176th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "Monotreme Cell-Cycles and the Evolution of Homeothermy" is the 21,854th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
22,398th place
92,044
-31,685
AR-score:
21,854th place
6,616
+8
F-score:
30,176th place
17
0

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
24,116th place
66,006
-18,529
AR-score:
28,939th place
4,050
+5
F-score:
85,391st place
4
0

Spanish Wikipedia (es)

PR-score:
13,879th place
8,799
-2,019
AR-score:
11,768th place
665
+1
F-score:
26,957th place
1
0

Chinese Wikipedia (zh)

PR-score:
8,670th place
5,739
-1,352
AR-score:
16,321st place
182
0
F-score:
24,774th place
1
0

Portuguese Wikipedia (pt)

PR-score:
10,027th place
3,594
-1,122
AR-score:
9,710th place
335
0
F-score:
9,668th place
2
0

Vietnamese Wikipedia (vi)

PR-score:
3,511th place
2,432
-2,476
AR-score:
6,503rd place
189
0
F-score:
14,463rd place
1
0

Lithuanian Wikipedia (lt)

PR-score:
178th place
960
-2,540
AR-score:
83rd place
760
0
F-score:
262nd place
1
0

Catalan Wikipedia (ca)

PR-score:
5,776th place
443
-602
AR-score:
11,434th place
132
0
F-score:
11,582nd place
1
0

Arabic Wikipedia (ar)

PR-score:
35,852nd place
271
-61
AR-score:
39,852nd place
86
+2
F-score:
8,462nd place
2
0

Asturian Wikipedia (ast)

PR-score:
4,136th place
19
-16
AR-score:
6,201st place
6
0
F-score:
5,332nd place
1
0
Show all Wikipedia languages...

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...