Potentially biogenic carbon preserved in a 4.1 billion-year-old zircon

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work Potentially biogenic carbon preserved in a 4.1 billion-year-old zircon was on the 1,055th place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 979th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "Potentially biogenic carbon preserved in a 4.1 billion-year-old zircon" is the 515th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
1,055th place
486,521
-213,537
AR-score:
515th place
45,768
+229
F-score:
979th place
134
+2

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
1,136th place
341,225
-146,497
AR-score:
635th place
26,434
+48
F-score:
2,500th place
31
0

French Wikipedia (fr)

PR-score:
562nd place
50,584
-11,306
AR-score:
359th place
5,932
-15
F-score:
1,084th place
12
0

Hebrew Wikipedia (he)

PR-score:
31st place
28,581
-5,700
AR-score:
37th place
5,581
+44
F-score:
725th place
1
0

Portuguese Wikipedia (pt)

PR-score:
1,456th place
20,190
-4,098
AR-score:
3,672nd place
836
+9
F-score:
9,331st place
2
0

Greek Wikipedia (el)

PR-score:
225th place
8,352
-3,858
AR-score:
336th place
789
0
F-score:
844th place
3
0

Vietnamese Wikipedia (vi)

PR-score:
4,820th place
1,728
+661
AR-score:
6,718th place
180
+103
F-score:
1,086th place
6
+1

Esperanto Wikipedia (eo)

PR-score:
20th place
1,410
-358
AR-score:
60th place
1,231
0
F-score:
356th place
2
0

Arabic Wikipedia (ar)

PR-score:
15,759th place
906
-67
AR-score:
16,539th place
217
0
F-score:
2,266th place
5
0

Basque Wikipedia (eu)

PR-score:
738th place
411
-640
AR-score:
1,196th place
159
0
F-score:
51st place
6
0
Show all Wikipedia languages...

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...