Rhodiola rosea for physical and mental fatigue: a systematic review

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the work Rhodiola rosea for physical and mental fatigue: a systematic review was on the 98,943rd place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular publications with DOI number in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this work was on the 139,894th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "Rhodiola rosea for physical and mental fatigue: a systematic review" is the 42,590th most reliable publication with DOI number in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

PR-score:
98,943rd place
30,895
-2,917
AR-score:
42,590th place
4,388
0
F-score:
139,894th place
6
0

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
190,828th place
12,587
-858
AR-score:
211,875th place
993
0
F-score:
516,480th place
1
0

Hungarian Wikipedia (hu)

PR-score:
175th place
11,250
-1,350
AR-score:
153rd place
2,100
0
F-score:
4,244th place
1
0

Italian Wikipedia (it)

PR-score:
7,063rd place
4,550
-1,250
AR-score:
3,057th place
1,150
0
F-score:
26,453rd place
1
0

Romanian Wikipedia (ro)

PR-score:
2,185th place
1,050
+150
AR-score:
3,883rd place
66
0
F-score:
8,659th place
1
0

Slovenian Wikipedia (sl)

PR-score:
761st place
1,011
+345
AR-score:
3,348th place
44
0
F-score:
6,620th place
1
0

Greek Wikipedia (el)

PR-score:
5,121st place
446
+46
AR-score:
7,292nd place
33
0
F-score:
10,445th place
1
0

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...