Best sources in Lojban Wikipedia PR-model

AR-model | F-model | PR-model
#WebsiteScore in June 20201m changes
1books.google.com8,488+327
2etymonline.com7,700-6,200
3undp.org4,100-800
4europa.eu3,766-167
5allmusic.com3,600-1,500
6oed.com3,360+180
7lojban.org2,600-300
8insee.fr1,800-1,000
9archive.org1,683-2,183
10jstor.org1,680+90
11tripod.com1,680+90
12oup.com1,600-100
13universalis.fr1,200+500
14cervantesvirtual.com1,000-1,500
15mit.edu800-500
16google.co.in700-1,000
17fao.org633-633
18wikipedia.org600-2,700
19henryandjoey.co.uk400-1,200
20boergoatshome.com400-1,200
21cervantes.es300-700
22biografiasyvidas.com300-800
23escritoras.com300-1,600
24everyhit.com250-450
25ultimahora.es100-200
26britannica.com83-183
27aapn.org41-92
28aamc.org41-92
29aldf.org41-92
30guardian.co.uk41-92
31city-journal.org41-92
32climate-data.org33-167
33insight-egypt.com33-67
34mmedia.me33-67
35knopedia.com33-67
36merkur.de25-250
37ovb-online.de25-250
38mittelbayerische.de25-250
39msn.com16-89
40bbc.co.uk16-89

Scientific publications with DOI number

#WebsiteScore in June 20201m changes

Popularity and reliability assessment of sources in references of Wikipedia in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps in July 2020. More details in the research "Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia". Values for PR-score and AR-score were additinaly increased 100 times (to distinguish smaller values in the ranking).

Useful links: