aspenideas.org

Multilingual Wikipedia

In June 2020 the website aspenideas.org was on the 92,759th place in the ranking of the most reliable and popular sources in multilingual Wikipedia from readers' point of view (PR-score). If we consider only frequency of appearance of this source in references of Wikipedia articles (F-score), this website was on the 77,490th place in June 2020. From Wikipedians' point of view, "aspenideas.org" is the 148,523rd most reliable source in different language versions of Wikipedia (AR-score).

The website is placed before patagonia-argentina.com and after fourthwallmagazine.co.uk in multilingual PR ranking of the most reliable sources in Wikipedia.

PR-score:
92,759th place
213,176
-115,742
AR-score:
148,523rd place
16,963
+564
F-score:
77,490th place
100
+3

English Wikipedia (en)

PR-score:
52,657th place
204,229
-113,706
AR-score:
75,023rd place
15,906
+465
F-score:
35,738th place
83
+3

Portuguese Wikipedia (pt)

PR-score:
77,234th place
3,143
-470
AR-score:
108,726th place
312
0
F-score:
58,408th place
3
0

German Wikipedia (de)

PR-score:
214,060th place
1,653
-817
AR-score:
422,170th place
30
+7
F-score:
430,150th place
1
0

French Wikipedia (fr)

PR-score:
180,149th place
1,623
+507
AR-score:
286,470th place
192
+24
F-score:
107,863rd place
4
0

Russian Wikipedia (ru)

PR-score:
202,129th place
1,139
-746
AR-score:
259,055th place
103
0
F-score:
94,753rd place
4
0

Vietnamese Wikipedia (vi)

PR-score:
39,670th place
659
-569
AR-score:
100,286th place
11
+1
F-score:
99,346th place
1
0

Chinese Wikipedia (zh)

PR-score:
129,124th place
647
+59
AR-score:
133,314th place
111
0
F-score:
142,202nd place
1
0

Arabic Wikipedia (ar)

PR-score:
134,739th place
66
0
AR-score:
84,149th place
266
+66
F-score:
77,620th place
2
0

Indonesian Wikipedia (id)

PR-score:
98,445th place
14
0
AR-score:
86,399th place
28
0
F-score:
85,847th place
1
0

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...