حقوق الإنجاب (Arabic Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "حقوق الإنجاب" in Arabic language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Arabic rank
1st place
1st place
195th place
95th place
2nd place
5th place
6th place
3rd place
3rd place
8th place
4th place
6th place
97th place
60th place
20th place
22nd place
8th place
10th place
772nd place
841st place
1,367th place
532nd place
36th place
76th place
4,204th place
1,909th place
26th place
31st place
9,659th place
8,977th place
1,210th place
1,111th place
low place
low place
9,860th place
3,757th place
70th place
26th place
4,098th place
5,043rd place
518th place
672nd place
456th place
830th place
5,436th place
3,550th place
218th place
222nd place
49th place
57th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,430th place
358th place
low place
low place
703rd place
613th place
low place
low place
2,275th place
4,717th place
2,365th place
5,148th place
139th place
277th place
6,135th place
6,456th place
279th place
601st place
low place
low place
437th place
2,333rd place
719th place
243rd place
low place
low place
1,791st place
699th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
916th place
711th place
378th place
333rd place
6,190th place
2,751st place
369th place
329th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
89th place
47th place
low place
low place
12th place
25th place
2,699th place
3,885th place
729th place
339th place
222nd place
221st place
7th place
23rd place
87th place
256th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
293rd place
676th place
115th place
364th place
487th place
466th place
7,885th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

abc.net.au

admin.ch

bag.admin.ch

amnesty.org

aph.gov.au

archive.is

archive.org

  • Cook، Rebecca J.؛ Fathalla، Mahmoud F. (1996). "Advancing Reproductive Rights Beyond Cairo and Beijing". International Family Planning Perspectives. ج. 22 ع. 3: 115–21. DOI:10.2307/2950752. JSTOR:2950752.
  • Money، John؛ Ehrhardt, Anke A. (1972). Man & Woman Boy & Girl. Differentiation and dimorphism of gender identity from conception to maturity. USA: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN:0-8018-1405-7. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-01-03.
  • Mugisha، Frederick (2009). "Chapter 42: HIV and AIDS, STIs and sexual health among young people". في Furlong، Andy (المحرر). Handbook of Youth and Young Adulthood. Routledge. ص. 344–352. ISBN:978-0-415-44541-2.
  • Knudson، Lara (2006). Reproductive Rights in a Global Context: South Africa, Uganda, Peru, Denmark, United States, Vietnam, Jordan. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.[بحاجة لرقم الصفحة]
  • Oswald، Frances (يوليو 1930). "Eugenical Sterilization in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. ج. 36 ع. 1: 65–73. DOI:10.1086/215285.
  • Schoen، Johanna (2001). "Between Choice and Coercion: Women and the Politics of Sterilization in North Carolina, 1929-1975". Journal of Women's History. ج. 13 ع. 1: 132–156. DOI:10.1353/jowh.2001.0034.
  • Carey، Allison C. (1998). "Gender and compulsory sterilization programs in America: 1907-1950". Journal of Historical Sociology. ج. 11 ع. 1: 74–105. DOI:10.1111/1467-6443.00054.

balkaninsight.com

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

biblegateway.com

bioline.org.br

books.google.com

catholic.com

cbc.ca

cdc.gov

cia.gov

cms.gov

coe.int

rm.coe.int

assembly.coe.int

hudoc.echr.coe.int

dccam.org

d.dccam.org

doi.org

  • Cook، Rebecca J.؛ Fathalla، Mahmoud F. (1996). "Advancing Reproductive Rights Beyond Cairo and Beijing". International Family Planning Perspectives. ج. 22 ع. 3: 115–21. DOI:10.2307/2950752. JSTOR:2950752.
  • Freedman، Lynn P.؛ Isaacs، Stephen L. (1993). "Human Rights and Reproductive Choice". Studies in Family Planning. ج. 24 ع. 1: 18–30. DOI:10.2307/2939211. JSTOR:2939211. PMID:8475521.
  • Bunch، Charlotte؛ Fried، Susana (1996). "Beijing '95: Moving Women's Human Rights from Margin to Center". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. ج. 22: 200–4. DOI:10.1086/495143. JSTOR:3175048.
  • De Irala، Jokin؛ Osorio، Alfonso؛ Carlos، Silvia؛ Lopez-Del Burgo، Cristina (2011). "Choice of birth control methods among European women and the role of partners and providers". Contraception. ج. 84 ع. 6: 558–64. DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.004. PMID:22078183.
  • Larsson، Margareta؛ Tydén، Tanja؛ Hanson، Ulf؛ Häggström-Nordin، Elisabet (2009). "Contraceptive use and associated factors among Swedish high school students". The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. ج. 12 ع. 2: 119–24. DOI:10.1080/13625180701217026. PMID:17559009.
  • Goicolea، Isabel (2010). "Adolescent Pregnancies in the Amazon Basin of Ecuador: A Rights and Gender Approach to Adolescents' Sexual and Reproductive Health". Global Health Action. ج. 3: 1–11. DOI:10.3402/gha.v3i0.5280.
  • Khalaf، Inaam؛ Fathieh Abu Moghli؛ Erika Sivarajan Froelicher (2010). "Youth Friendly Reproductive Services in Jordan from the Perspective of the Youth: A Descriptive Qualitative Study". Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. ج. 24 ع. 2: 321–331. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00723.x.
  • Grossman، Daniel؛ Baum، Sarah؛ Fuentes، Liza؛ White، Kari؛ Hopkins، Kristine؛ Stevenson، Amanda؛ Potter، Joseph E. (2014). "Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas". Contraception. ج. 90 ع. 5: 496–501. DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006. PMC:4179978. PMID:25128413.
  • Goldman، Lisa A.؛ García، Sandra G.؛ Díaz، Juan؛ Yam، Eileen A. (15 نوفمبر 2005). "Brazilian obstetrician-gynecologists and abortion: a survey of knowledge, opinions and practices". Reproductive Health. ج. 2: 10. DOI:10.1186/1742-4755-2-10. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-08 – عبر BioMed Central.{{استشهاد بدورية محكمة}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: دوي مجاني غير معلم (link)
  • Bulte, E., Heerink, N., & Zhang, X. (2011). "China's one-child policy and 'the mystery of missing women': ethnic minorities and male-biased sex ratios". Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. ج. 73 ع. 1: 0305–9049. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00601.x.{{استشهاد بدورية محكمة}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: أسماء متعددة: قائمة المؤلفين (link)
  • Oswald، Frances (يوليو 1930). "Eugenical Sterilization in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. ج. 36 ع. 1: 65–73. DOI:10.1086/215285.
  • Schoen، Johanna (2001). "Between Choice and Coercion: Women and the Politics of Sterilization in North Carolina, 1929-1975". Journal of Women's History. ج. 13 ع. 1: 132–156. DOI:10.1353/jowh.2001.0034.
  • Carey، Allison C. (1998). "Gender and compulsory sterilization programs in America: 1907-1950". Journal of Historical Sociology. ج. 11 ع. 1: 74–105. DOI:10.1111/1467-6443.00054.

fhi.org

gaystarnews.com

guttmacher.org

hampshire.edu

popdev.hampshire.edu

hrw.org

huffpost.com

iisd.org

enb.iisd.org

independent.co.uk

inquirer.net

newsinfo.inquirer.net

ippfwhr.org

ipsnews.net

ishr.ch

iwhc.org

jstor.org

  • Cook، Rebecca J.؛ Fathalla، Mahmoud F. (1996). "Advancing Reproductive Rights Beyond Cairo and Beijing". International Family Planning Perspectives. ج. 22 ع. 3: 115–21. DOI:10.2307/2950752. JSTOR:2950752.
  • Freedman، Lynn P.؛ Isaacs، Stephen L. (1993). "Human Rights and Reproductive Choice". Studies in Family Planning. ج. 24 ع. 1: 18–30. DOI:10.2307/2939211. JSTOR:2939211. PMID:8475521.
  • Bunch، Charlotte؛ Fried، Susana (1996). "Beijing '95: Moving Women's Human Rights from Margin to Center". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. ج. 22: 200–4. DOI:10.1086/495143. JSTOR:3175048.

loc.gov

thomas.loc.gov

  • Center for Reproductive Rights, International Legal Program, Establishing International Reproductive Rights Norms: Theory for Change, US CONG. REC. 108th CONG. 1 Sess. E2534 E2547 (Rep. Smith) (Dec. 8, 2003):

    We have been leaders in bringing arguments for a woman's right to choose abortion within the rubric of international human rights. However, there is no binding hard norm that recognizes women's right to terminate a pregnancy. (...) While there are hard norms prohibiting sex discrimination that apply to girl adolescents, these are problematic since they must be applied to a substantive right (i.e., the right to health) and the substantive reproductive rights of adolescents are not `hard' (yet!). There are no hard norms on age discrimination that would protect adolescents' ability to exercise their rights to reproductive health, sexual education, or reproductive decisionmaking. In addition, there are no hard norms prohibiting discrimination based on marital status, which is often an issue with respect to unmarried adolescents' access to reproductive health services and information. The soft norms support the idea that the hard norms apply to adolescents under 18. They also fill in the substantive gaps in the hard norms with respect to reproductive health services and information as well as adolescents' reproductive autonomy. (...) There are no hard norms in international human rights law that directly address HIV/AIDS directly. At the same time, a number of human rights bodies have developed soft norms to secure rights that are rendered vulnerable by the HIV/AIDS epidemic. (...) Practices with implications for women's reproductive rights in relation to HIV/AIDS are still not fully covered under existing international law, although soft norms have addressed them to some extent. (...) There is a lack of explicit prohibition of mandatory testing of HIV-positive pregnant women under international law. (...) None of the global human rights treaties explicitly prohibit child marriage and no treaty prescribes an appropriate minimum age for marriage. The onus of specifying a minimum age at marriage rests with the states' parties to these treaties. (...) We have to rely extensively on soft norms that have evolved from the TMBs and that are contained in conference documents to assert that child marriage is a violation of fundamental human rights.

    نسخة محفوظة 30 أغسطس 2015 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • Amnesty International, Defenders of Sexual and Reproductive Rights نسخة محفوظة 2013-10-02 على موقع واي باك مشين.; International Women’s Health Coalition and the United Nations, Campaign for an Inter-American Convention on Sexual and Reproductive Rights , Women's Health Collection, Abortion as a human right: possible strategies in unexplored territory. (Sexual Rights and Reproductive Rights), (2003); and Shanthi Dairiam, Applying the CEDAW Convention for the recognition of women's health rights, Arrows For Change, (2002). In this regard, the Center for Reproductive Rights has noted that:

    Our goal is to ensure that governments worldwide guarantee women's reproductive rights out of an understanding that they are bound to do so. The two principal prerequisites for achieving this goal are: (1) the strengthening of international legal norms protecting reproductive rights; and (2) consistent and effective action on the part of civil society and the international community to enforce these norms. Each of these conditions, in turn, depends upon profound social change at the local, national and international (including regional) levels. (...) Ultimately, we must persuade governments to accept reproductive rights as binding norms. Again, our approach can move forward on several fronts, with interventions both at the national and international levels. Governments' recognition of reproductive rights norms may be indicated by their support for progressive language in international conference documents or by their adoption and implementation of appropriate national-level legislative and policy instruments. In order to counter opposition to an expansion of recognized reproductive rights norms, we have questioned the credibility of such reactionary yet influential international actors as the United States and the Holy See. Our activities to garner support for international protections of reproductive rights include: Lobbying government delegations at UN conferences and producing supporting analyses/materials; fostering alliances with members of civil society who may become influential on their national delegations to the UN; and preparing briefing papers and factsheets exposing the broad anti-woman agenda of our opposition.

    Center for Reproductive Rights, International Legal Program, Establishing International Reproductive Rights Norms: Theory for Change نسخة محفوظة 30 يناير 2006 على موقع واي باك مشين., US CONG. REC. 108th CONG. 1 Sess. E2534 E2547 (Rep. Smith) (Dec. 8, 2003)

medscape.com

nationalcenterformen.org

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Freedman، Lynn P.؛ Isaacs، Stephen L. (1993). "Human Rights and Reproductive Choice". Studies in Family Planning. ج. 24 ع. 1: 18–30. DOI:10.2307/2939211. JSTOR:2939211. PMID:8475521.
  • McCulley Melanie G (1998). "The male abortion: the putative father's right to terminate his interests in and obligations to the unborn child". The Journal of Law and Policy. ج. VII ع. 1: 1–55. PMID:12666677.
  • De Irala، Jokin؛ Osorio، Alfonso؛ Carlos، Silvia؛ Lopez-Del Burgo، Cristina (2011). "Choice of birth control methods among European women and the role of partners and providers". Contraception. ج. 84 ع. 6: 558–64. DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.004. PMID:22078183.
  • Ketting، E؛ Esin، A (2010). "Integrating sexual and reproductive health in primary health care in Europe: Position paper of the European Forum for Primary Care". Quality in primary care. ج. 18 ع. 4: 269–82. PMID:20836943.
  • Larsson، Margareta؛ Tydén، Tanja؛ Hanson، Ulf؛ Häggström-Nordin، Elisabet (2009). "Contraceptive use and associated factors among Swedish high school students". The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. ج. 12 ع. 2: 119–24. DOI:10.1080/13625180701217026. PMID:17559009.
  • Grossman، Daniel؛ Baum، Sarah؛ Fuentes، Liza؛ White، Kari؛ Hopkins، Kristine؛ Stevenson، Amanda؛ Potter، Joseph E. (2014). "Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas". Contraception. ج. 90 ع. 5: 496–501. DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006. PMC:4179978. PMID:25128413.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nocirc.org

  • "Template". Nocirc.org. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-01-20. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2017-08-19.

nrlc.org

nytimes.com

oas.org

ohchr.org

ohchr.org

tbinternet.ohchr.org

oii.org.au

popcouncil.org

populationmatters.org

reuters.com

rewirenewsgroup.com

romea.cz

salon.com

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

  • Owens، Lisa Lucile (2013). "Coerced Parenthood as Family Policy: Feminism, the Moral Agency of Women, and Men's 'Right to Choose'". Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review. ج. 5: 1–33. SSRN:2439294.

thefreelibrary.com

theglobeandmail.com

theguardian.com

therealpresence.org

thoughtco.com

un-documents.net

un.org

un.org

daccess-dds-ny.un.org

unaids.org

undp.org

unfpa.org

unhchr.ch

unicef.org

uscourts.gov

ca6.uscourts.gov

utexas.edu

liberalarts.utexas.edu

web.archive.org

who.int

who.int

apps.who.int

afro.who.int

euro.who.int

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

wiley.com

www3.interscience.wiley.com

wrlc.org

aladinrc.wrlc.org

yogyakartaprinciples.org