أنواع المغالطات (Arabic Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "أنواع المغالطات" in Arabic language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Arabic rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
3rd place
8th place
low place
9,105th place
9,048th place
low place
low place
low place
40th place
15th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,379th place
1,142nd place
6th place
3rd place
26th place
31st place
4,757th place
3,814th place
613th place
419th place
low place
low place
2,754th place
3,538th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,869th place
6,374th place
low place
low place

alleydog.com

archive.org

books.google.com

  • Pirie، Madsen (2006). How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic. A&C Black. ص. 46. ISBN:978-0-8264-9006-3. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-02-06. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2015-09-10.
  • Feinberg، Joel (2007). "Psychological Egoism". في Shafer-Landau، Russ (المحرر). Ethical Theory: An Anthology. Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies. Wiley-Blackwell. ص. 193. ISBN:978-1-4051-3320-3. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-12-16.
  • Wimsatt, William K. and مونرو بياردسلي. "The Intentional Fallacy." Sewanee Review, vol. 54 (1946): 468–88. Revised and republished in The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry, U of Kentucky P, 1954: 3–18. نسخة محفوظة 8 فبراير 2017 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • Taleb، Nassim (2007). The Black Swan. Random House. ص. 309. ISBN:1-4000-6351-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2014-08-15. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-02-24.
  • John D. Ramage؛ John C. Bean؛ June Johnson (2016). Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings, Concise Edition, MLA Update Edition. Pearson Education. ص. 275. ISBN:978-0-13-458649-6. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-02-20.

britannica.com

  • "fallacy". Britannica.com. Encyclopedia Britannica. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-03-28. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2017-06-13.

changingminds.org

don-lindsay-archive.org

fallacyfiles.org

hbr.org

jstor.org

logical-critical-thinking.com

logicallyfallacious.com

nizkor.org

oswego.edu

cs.oswego.edu

ox.ac.uk

blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

  • Shackel، Nicholas (5 سبتمبر 2014). "Motte and Bailey Doctrines". Practical Ethics: Ethics in the News. Cardiff University. University of Oxford. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-05-14. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-05-23. Some people have spoken of a Motte and Bailey Doctrine as being a fallacy and others of it being a matter of strategic equivocation. Strictly speaking, neither is correct.

skepdic.com

slatestarcodex.com

  • Alexander، Scott (nom de plume) (3 نوفمبر 2014). "All in All, Another Brick in the Motte". Slate Star Codex. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-05-24. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-05-23. The motte-and-bailey...is a...mirror image of...the weak man fallacy [that] is replacing a strong position with a weak position to better attack it; motte-and-bailey is replacing a weak position with a strong position to better defend it.

thedailybell.com

toolkitforthinking.com

txstate.edu

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

web.archive.org

yourlogicalfallacyis.com