إلحاد (Arabic Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "إلحاد" in Arabic language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Arabic rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
8th place
6th place
3rd place
2nd place
5th place
8th place
10th place
low place
low place
43rd place
2nd place
low place
2,157th place
1,242nd place
558th place
209th place
162nd place
179th place
237th place
low place
low place
9,594th place
1,797th place
low place
low place
105th place
260th place
low place
8,140th place
low place
low place
325th place
30th place
low place
low place
low place
328th place
40th place
15th place
489th place
563rd place
5th place
4th place
2,387th place
3,229th place
378th place
333rd place
266th place
1,066th place
4,404th place
low place
24th place
55th place
34th place
88th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
583rd place
3,495th place
12th place
25th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4th place
6th place
26th place
31st place
low place
low place
low place
4,593rd place
low place
low place
9th place
18th place
low place
low place
1,933rd place
1,713th place
234th place
251st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,648th place
1,437th place
1,563rd place
7,874th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

acton.org

alanwallace.org

  • Wallace، B. Alan Ph.D. (نوفمبر 1999). "Is Buddhism Really Non-Theistic?" (PDF). National Conference of the American Academy of Religion lectures. Boston. ص. 8. مؤرشف من الأصل (PDF) في 2016-03-04. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2014-07-22."Thus, in light of the theoretical progression from the bhavaºga to the tath›gatagarbha to the primordial wisdom of the absolute space of reality, Buddhism is not so simply non-theistic as it may appear at first glance."

amazon.com

archive.org

askanatheist.org

baheth.info

bbc.co.uk

bede.org.uk

booked.net

books.google.com

  • Hancock، Ralph (1996). The Legacy of the French Revolution. Lanham, United States: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. ص. 22. ISBN:978-0847678426. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-05-02. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2015-05-30., Extract of page 22
  • Wuthnow, Robert (1998). The Encyclopedia of Politics and Religion (vol. 2). p. 60. نسخة محفوظة 2022-11-01 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • Zuckerman، Phil (2007). Martin, Michael T (المحرر). The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ص. 56. ISBN:978-0-521-60367-6. OL:22379448M. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2016-07-29. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-04-09.
  • إلحاد, pp. 467–468: "In the popular sense an agnostic neither believes nor disbelieves that God exists, while an atheist disbelieves that God exists. However, this common contrast of agnosticism with atheism will hold only if one assumes that atheism means positive atheism. In the popular sense, agnosticism is compatible with negative atheism. Since negative atheism by definition simply means not holding any concept of God, it is compatible with neither believing nor disbelieving in God." "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-01-07. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-01-05.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
  • إلحاد, pp. 49–51: "The atheist may however be, and not unfrequently is, an agnostic. There is an agnostic atheism or atheistic agnosticism, and the combination of atheism with agnosticism which may be so named is not an uncommon one." "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-01-06. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-01-05.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
  • Holland, Aaron. Agnosticism, in إلحاد, p. 34: "It is important to note that this interpretation of agnosticism is compatible with theism or atheism, since it is only asserted that knowledge of God's existence is unattainable." "It+is+important+to+note+that+this+interpretation+of+agnosticism" نسخة محفوظة 6 يناير 2020 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • إلحاد, p. 96: "People are invariably surprised to hear me say I am both an atheist and an agnostic, as if this somehow weakens my certainty. I usually reply with a question like, "Well, are you a Republican or an American?" The two words serve different concepts and are not mutually exclusive. Agnosticism addresses knowledge; atheism addresses belief. The agnostic says, "I don't have a knowledge that God exists." The atheist says, "I don't have a belief that God exists." You can say both things at the same time. Some agnostics are atheistic and some are theistic." "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-01-06. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-01-05.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
  • جورج هوليوك (1842). "Mr. Mackintosh's New God". The Oracle of Reason, Or, Philosophy Vindicated  [لغات أخرى]. 1 (23): 186. from the original on 30 October 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2015. On the contrary, I, as an Atheist, simply profess that I do not see sufficient reason to believe that there is a god. I do not pretend to know that there is no god. The whole question of god's existence, belief or disbelief, a question of probability or of improbability, not knowledge. "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2015-10-30. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-01-05.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
  • Harris 2006، صفحة 51.
  • Johnson، Philip؛ وآخرون (2005). Claydon، David؛ وآخرون (المحررون). Religious and Non-Religious Spirituality in the Western World ("New Age"). William Carey Library. ج. 2. ص. 194. ISBN:978-0-87808-364-0. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-10. Although Neo-Pagans share common commitments to nature and spirit there is a diversity of beliefs and practices ... Some are atheists, others are polytheists (several gods exist), some are pantheists (all is God) and others are panentheists (all is in God). {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة) و|عمل= تُجوهل (مساعدة)
  • Matthews، Carol S. (2009). New Religions. Chelsea House Publishers. ISBN:978-0-7910-8096-2. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-10. There is no universal worldview that all Neo-Pagans/Wiccans hold. One online information source indicates that depending on how the term God is defined, Neo-Pagans might be classified as monotheists, duotheists (two gods), polytheists, pantheists, or atheists. {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة)
  • Chakravarti، Sitansu (1991). Hinduism, a way of life. Motilal Banarsidass. ص. 65. ISBN:978-81-208-0899-7. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-04-13. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2015-08-13. For the thoroughgoing atheist, the path is extremely difficult, if not lonely, for he can not develop any relationship of love with God, nor can he expect any divine help on the long and arduous journey.
  • Kedar، Nath Tiwari (1997). Comparative Religion. Motilal Banarsidass. ص. 50. ISBN:978-81-208-0293-3. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2016-12-24. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-09-21.
  • Jacobs، Jonathan D. (2015). "7. The Ineffable, Inconceivable, and Incomprehensible God. Fundamentality and Apophatic Theology". في Kvanvig، Jonathan (المحرر). Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Volume 6. Oxford University Press. ص. 168. ISBN:978-0-19-872233-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-04-23. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2017-04-22.
  • Fagenblat، Michael، المحرر (2017). Negative Theology as Jewish Modernity. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. ص. 3. ISBN:978-0-253-02504-3. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-04-16. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2017-04-19.
  • Bryson، Michael E. (2016). The Atheist Milton. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. ص. 114. ISBN:978-1-317-04095-8. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-04-16. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2017-04-19.
  • Chakravarti، Sitansu (1991). Hinduism, a way of life. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. ص. 71. ISBN:978-81-208-0899-7. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-10. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-04-09. According to Hinduism, the path of the atheist is very difficult to follow in matters of spirituality, though it is a valid one.
  • Human Rights, Virtue, and the Common Good. رومان آند ليتل فيلد  [لغات أخرى]‏. 1996. ISBN:978-0-8476-8279-9. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-10. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-04-09. That problem was brought home to us with dazzling clarity by Nietzsche, who had reflected more deeply than any of his contemporaries on the implications of godlessness and come to the conclusion that a fatal contradiction lay at the heart of modern theological enterprise: it thought that Christian morality, which it wished to preserve, was independent of Christian dogma, which it rejected. This, in Nietzsche's mind, was an absurdity. It amounted to nothing less than dismissing the architect while trying to keep the building or getting rid of the lawgiver while claiming the protection of the law. {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة)صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link)
  • The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. وايلي-بلاكويل  [لغات أخرى]‏. 11 مايو 2009. ISBN:978-1-4051-7657-6. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-10. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-04-09. Morality "has truth only if God is truth–it stands or falls with faith in God" (Nietzsche 1968, p. 70). The moral argument for the existence of God essentially takes Nietzsche's assertion as one of its premises: if there is no God, then "there are altogether no moral facts". {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة)صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link)
  • Victorian Subjects. Duke University Press. 1991. ISBN:978-0-8223-1110-2. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-10. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-04-09. Like other mid-nineteenth-century writers, George Eliot was not fully aware of the implications of her humanism, and, as Nietzsche saw, attempted the difficult task of upholding the Christian morality of altruism without faith in the Christian God. {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة)
  • Feinberg، John S.؛ Feinberg، Paul D. (2010). Ethics for a Brave New World. Stand To Reason. ISBN:978-1-58134-712-8. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-10. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2007-10-18. Over a half century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: 'Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.' Since then I have spent well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: 'Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.' {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة)

britannica.com

buddhistinformation.com

  • V.A. Gunasekara, "The Buddhist Attitude to God". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2008-01-02. In the Bhuridatta Jataka, "The Buddha argues that the three most commonly given attributes of God, viz. omnipotence, omniscience and benevolence towards humanity cannot all be mutually compatible with the existential fact of dukkha."

catholiceducation.org

clearpixel.com

publishclearly.clearpixel.com

doi.org

edge.org

ehess.fr

gahom.ehess.fr

fair-use.org

fordham.edu

sourcebooks.fordham.edu

friesian.com

gutenberg.org

huffpost.com

infidels.org

irishtimes.com

jstor.org

ladeeni.net

learnreligions.com

lexico.com

  • "Atheism". OxfordDictionaries.com. دار نشر جامعة أكسفورد. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2016-09-11. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2017-04-23. "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2016-09-11. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2015-07-31.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
  • "Atheism". Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-08-12. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2013-11-21.

lsr-projekt.de

marxmyths.org

merriam-webster.com

  • "Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2011-05-14. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-04-09. ...belief in the existence of a god or gods...
  • "Atheism". Encyclopædia Britannica Concise. Merriam Webster. from the original on 21 January 2012. Retrieved 15 December 2011. Critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or divine beings. Unlike agnosticism, which leaves open the question of whether there is a God, atheism is a positive denial. It is rooted in an array of philosophical systems. "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2013-11-13. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-01-05.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)

mid-day.com

  • Pattanaik، Devdutt (18 أغسطس 2009). "63 worthy beings". Mid-day. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2012-09-27. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2014-07-15.

nature.com

ncregister.com

nd.edu

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

openlibrary.org

pitzer.edu

dwardmac.pitzer.edu

  • Bakunin، Michael (1916). "God and the State". New York: Mother Earth Publishing Association. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2011-05-21. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-04-09.

pitweb.pitzer.edu

positiveatheism.org

pragmatism.org

shook.pragmatism.org

qdl.qa

rael.org

  • The Raelian Foundation (2005). Intelligent Design. ص. 312. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2014-07-07. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2014-07-11.

religion-online.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

stephenjaygould.org

theguardian.com

truthdig.com

  • Harris، Sam (2005). "An Atheist Manifesto". Truthdig. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2011-05-16. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-04-09. In a world riven by ignorance, only the atheist refuses to deny the obvious: Religious faith promotes human violence to an astonishing degree.

ucsd.edu

psy.ucsd.edu

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

webcitation.org

  • Smart، J.C.C. (9 مارس 2004). "Atheism and Agnosticism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2012-01-30. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-04-09.

wikidata.org

wikimedia.org

meta.wikimedia.org

  • Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Atheism" . موسوعة بريتانيكا الحادية عشرة (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. The term as generally used, however, is highly ambiguous. Its meaning varies (a) according to the various definitions of deity, and especially (b) according as it is (i.) deliberately adopted by a thinker as a description of his own theological standpoint, or (ii.) applied by one set of thinkers to their opponents. As to (a), it is obvious that atheism from the standpoint of the Christian is a very different conception as compared with atheism as understood by a Deist, a Positivist, a follower of Euhemerus or Herbert Spencer, or a Buddhist.
  • Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Atheism" . موسوعة بريتانيكا الحادية عشرة (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. But dogmatic atheism is rare compared with the sceptical type, which is identical with agnosticism in so far as it denies the capacity of the mind of man to form any conception of God, but is different from it in so far as the agnostic merely holds his judgment in suspense, though, in practice, agnosticism is apt to result in an attitude towards religion which is hardly distinguishable from a passive and unaggressive atheism.

wingia.com

worldcat.org

youtube.com

  • ملاحظة: الملحدون كالمؤمنين إلى حد ما لهم أسبابهم المتعلقة بهم. شاهد الفيلم الوثائقي Why Do People Laugh at Creationists? (هنا أجزاء منه على يوتيوب على يوتيوب) للتعرف على تفاصيل الأسباب الفلسفية والعلمية التي يستندون إليها