اصطناع تطوري حديث (Arabic Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "اصطناع تطوري حديث" in Arabic language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Arabic rank

6web.archive.org

1^st place

3doi.org

2^nd place

5^th place

3nih.gov

4^th place

6^th place

2archive.org

6^th place

3^rd place

1nap.edu

2,128^th place

1,393^rd place

1wallacefund.info

low place

1darwin-online.org.uk

2,821^st place

2,541^st place

1deutschestextarchiv.de

low place

1jstor.org

26^th place

31^st place

1jic.ac.uk

low place

archive.org

Butler، Samuel (1880). Unconscious Memory. David Bogue. ص. 280. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-09-09. I may predict with some certainty that before long we shall find the original Darwinism of Dr. إراسموس داروين … generally accepted instead of the neo-Darwinism of to-day, and that the variations whose accumulation results in species will be recognised as due to the wants and endeavours of the living forms in which they appear, instead of being ascribed to chance, or, in other words, to unknown causes, as by Mr. Charles Darwin's system "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-04-11. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-04-11.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
Gayon, Jean (1998). Darwinism's Struggle for Survival: Heredity and the Hypothesis of Natural Selection. Cambridge University Press. ص. 2–3. ISBN:978-0-521-56250-8.

darwin-online.org.uk

Darwin، Charles (1868). The variation of animals and plants under domestication. John Murray. ISBN:978-1-4191-8660-8. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-12-16.

deutschestextarchiv.de

Weismann, August (1892). Das Keimplasma: eine Theorie der Vererbung [The Germ Plasm: A theory of inheritance]. Jena: Fischer. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-04-11.

doi.org

Kutschera، Ulrich (ديسمبر 2003). "A comparative analysis of the Darwin-Wallace papers and the development of the concept of natural selection". Theory in Biosciences. ج. 122 ع. 4: 343–359. DOI:10.1007/s12064-003-0063-6.
Holterhoff, Kate (2014). "The History and Reception of Charles Darwin's Hypothesis of Pangenesis". Journal of the History of Biology. ج. 47 ع. 4: 661–695. DOI:10.1007/s10739-014-9377-0. PMID:24570302.
Noble، Denis (2011). "Neo-Darwinism, the Modern Synthesis and selfish genes: are they of use in physiology?". The Journal of Physiology. ج. 589 ع. 5: 1007–1015. DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.201384. PMC:3060581. PMID:21135048.

jic.ac.uk

Ambrose، Mike. "Mendel's Peas". Norwich, UK: Germplasm Resources Unit, John Innes Centre. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2016-06-14. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2017-12-14.

jstor.org

Gauthier، Peter (مارس–مايو 1990). "Does Weismann's Experiment Constitute a Refutation of the Lamarckian Hypothesis?". BIOS. ج. 61 ع. 1/2: 6–8. JSTOR:4608123.

nap.edu

"Appendix: Frequently Asked Questions". Science and Creationism: a view from the National Academy of Sciences (php) (ط. Second). Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences. 1999. ص. 28. ISBN:ISBN 0-309-06406-6. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-12-10. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2009-09-24. The scientific consensus around evolution is overwhelming. {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة) وتأكد من صحة |isbn= القيمة: حرف غير صالح (مساعدة)

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Holterhoff, Kate (2014). "The History and Reception of Charles Darwin's Hypothesis of Pangenesis". Journal of the History of Biology. ج. 47 ع. 4: 661–695. DOI:10.1007/s10739-014-9377-0. PMID:24570302.
Noble، Denis (2011). "Neo-Darwinism, the Modern Synthesis and selfish genes: are they of use in physiology?". The Journal of Physiology. ج. 589 ع. 5: 1007–1015. DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.201384. PMC:3060581. PMID:21135048.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Noble، Denis (2011). "Neo-Darwinism, the Modern Synthesis and selfish genes: are they of use in physiology?". The Journal of Physiology. ج. 589 ع. 5: 1007–1015. DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.201384. PMC:3060581. PMID:21135048.

wallacefund.info

Beccaloni، George (2013). "On the Terms "Darwinism" and "Neo-Darwinism"". A. R. Wallace Website. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-04-11.

web.archive.org

"Appendix: Frequently Asked Questions". Science and Creationism: a view from the National Academy of Sciences (php) (ط. Second). Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences. 1999. ص. 28. ISBN:ISBN 0-309-06406-6. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-12-10. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2009-09-24. The scientific consensus around evolution is overwhelming. {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة) وتأكد من صحة |isbn= القيمة: حرف غير صالح (مساعدة)
Butler، Samuel (1880). Unconscious Memory. David Bogue. ص. 280. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-09-09. I may predict with some certainty that before long we shall find the original Darwinism of Dr. إراسموس داروين … generally accepted instead of the neo-Darwinism of to-day, and that the variations whose accumulation results in species will be recognised as due to the wants and endeavours of the living forms in which they appear, instead of being ascribed to chance, or, in other words, to unknown causes, as by Mr. Charles Darwin's system "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-04-11. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-04-11.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
Beccaloni، George (2013). "On the Terms "Darwinism" and "Neo-Darwinism"". A. R. Wallace Website. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-04-11.
Darwin، Charles (1868). The variation of animals and plants under domestication. John Murray. ISBN:978-1-4191-8660-8. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-12-16.
Weismann, August (1892). Das Keimplasma: eine Theorie der Vererbung [The Germ Plasm: A theory of inheritance]. Jena: Fischer. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-04-11.
Ambrose، Mike. "Mendel's Peas". Norwich, UK: Germplasm Resources Unit, John Innes Centre. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2016-06-14. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2017-12-14.