Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "التعديل الثامن لدستور الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية" in Arabic language version.
{{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link){{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)But, says Stinneford, punishment is unacceptable only if it is "both cruel and 'contrary to long usage'". Id. at 977 (emphasis added). "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2016-03-18. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-10-03.[E]ven if one stacked up all of Oates's punishments together—the fine, the whippings, the imprisonment, the pillorying, and the defrockment—their cumulative effect was less harsh as an absolute matter than some punishments considered acceptable at the time, such as drawing and quartering or burning at the stake. If the punishments inflicted on Oates were unacceptably cruel, this could only be because they were disproportionate to the crime of perjury.
{{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link){{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)But, says Stinneford, punishment is unacceptable only if it is "both cruel and 'contrary to long usage'". Id. at 977 (emphasis added). "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2016-03-18. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-10-03.[E]ven if one stacked up all of Oates's punishments together—the fine, the whippings, the imprisonment, the pillorying, and the defrockment—their cumulative effect was less harsh as an absolute matter than some punishments considered acceptable at the time, such as drawing and quartering or burning at the stake. If the punishments inflicted on Oates were unacceptably cruel, this could only be because they were disproportionate to the crime of perjury.
{{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link){{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)