Indrani Chatterjee؛ Richard M. Eaton (2006). Slavery and South Asian History. Indiana University Press. ص. 122–123. ISBN:978-0-253-11671-0. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2023-02-16., Quote: "The importation of Ethiopian slaves into the western Deccan profoundly altered the region's society and culture [...]"
Scott C. Levi (2002). "Hindus Beyond the Hindu Kush: Indians in the Central Asian Slave Trade". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. Cambridge University Press. ج. 12 ع. 3: 277–288. DOI:10.1017/S1356186302000329. JSTOR:25188289. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2023-05-14., Quote: "Sources such as the Arthasastra, the Manusmriti and the Mahabharata demonstrate that institutionalized slavery was well established in India by beginning of the common era. Earlier sources suggest that it was likely to have been equally widespread by the lifetime of the Buddha (sixth century BC), and perhaps even as far back as the Vedic period. [footnote 2: (...) While it is likely that the institution of slavery existed in India during the Vedic period, the association of the Vedic 'Dasa' with 'slaves' is problematic and likely to have been a later development."
Walker، Timothy (2004). "Abolishing the slave trade in Portuguese India: documentary evidence of popular and official resistance to crown policy, 1842–60". Slavery & Abolition. Taylor & Francis. ج. 25 ع. 2: 63–79. DOI:10.1080/0144039042000293045. S2CID:142692153.
Scott C. Levi (2002). "Hindus Beyond the Hindu Kush: Indians in the Central Asian Slave Trade". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. Cambridge University Press. ج. 12 ع. 3: 277–288. DOI:10.1017/S1356186302000329. JSTOR:25188289. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2023-05-14., Quote: "Sources such as the Arthasastra, the Manusmriti and the Mahabharata demonstrate that institutionalized slavery was well established in India by beginning of the common era. Earlier sources suggest that it was likely to have been equally widespread by the lifetime of the Buddha (sixth century BC), and perhaps even as far back as the Vedic period. [footnote 2: (...) While it is likely that the institution of slavery existed in India during the Vedic period, the association of the Vedic 'Dasa' with 'slaves' is problematic and likely to have been a later development."
Walker، Timothy (2004). "Abolishing the slave trade in Portuguese India: documentary evidence of popular and official resistance to crown policy, 1842–60". Slavery & Abolition. Taylor & Francis. ج. 25 ع. 2: 63–79. DOI:10.1080/0144039042000293045. S2CID:142692153.
web.archive.org
Scott C. Levi (2002). "Hindus Beyond the Hindu Kush: Indians in the Central Asian Slave Trade". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. Cambridge University Press. ج. 12 ع. 3: 277–288. DOI:10.1017/S1356186302000329. JSTOR:25188289. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2023-05-14., Quote: "Sources such as the Arthasastra, the Manusmriti and the Mahabharata demonstrate that institutionalized slavery was well established in India by beginning of the common era. Earlier sources suggest that it was likely to have been equally widespread by the lifetime of the Buddha (sixth century BC), and perhaps even as far back as the Vedic period. [footnote 2: (...) While it is likely that the institution of slavery existed in India during the Vedic period, the association of the Vedic 'Dasa' with 'slaves' is problematic and likely to have been a later development."
Indrani Chatterjee؛ Richard M. Eaton (2006). Slavery and South Asian History. Indiana University Press. ص. 122–123. ISBN:978-0-253-11671-0. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2023-02-16., Quote: "The importation of Ethiopian slaves into the western Deccan profoundly altered the region's society and culture [...]"
Scott C. Levi (2002). "Hindus Beyond the Hindu Kush: Indians in the Central Asian Slave Trade". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. Cambridge University Press. 12 (3): 284.https://www.jstor.org/stable/25188289?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-03-08. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-10-19.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
Scott C. Levi (2002). "Hindus Beyond the Hindu Kush: Indians in the Central Asian Slave Trade". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. Cambridge University Press. ج. 12 ع. 3: 277–288. DOI:10.1017/S1356186302000329. JSTOR:25188289. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2023-05-14., Quote: "Sources such as the Arthasastra, the Manusmriti and the Mahabharata demonstrate that institutionalized slavery was well established in India by beginning of the common era. Earlier sources suggest that it was likely to have been equally widespread by the lifetime of the Buddha (sixth century BC), and perhaps even as far back as the Vedic period. [footnote 2: (...) While it is likely that the institution of slavery existed in India during the Vedic period, the association of the Vedic 'Dasa' with 'slaves' is problematic and likely to have been a later development."
